العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Nelson Deossa

Real Betis
Half-space creator CM
43% of actions in the half-spaces
Capability Analysis
Successful Dribble94%vs 35 central mids
"Can he beat a man in a straight 1v1?"
Successful take-ons /902.4897%
Take-on success66.67%92%
Progression20%vs 35 central mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /901.8611%
Line-breaking passes /900.6211%
Threat added by passing /900.59xT11%
Pass accuracy82.48%47%
Ball-Carrying77%vs 35 central mids
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /903.9353%
Carry distance /90123.28m67%
Successful take-ons /902.4897%
Take-on success66.67%92%
Chance Creation16%vs 35 central mids
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.06xA36%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.59xT11%
Box entries (pass) /900.6219%
central midtransition runnerprogressionbox-to-box
480
minutes
10 apps
13
progressive passes
2.4/90
83%
pass completion
257 passes
3
key passes
0.56/90
1
box entries
0.19/90
18
final-3rd entries
3.4/90
11
dribbles
64% won
47
possessions lost
2.62 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (53% of his 257 passes)
83% completion · 257× in 10/10 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
2.4 prog/90 · 13× in 5/10 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.56 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 25× in 3/10 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
19

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
26
passes / match
1.8
dribbles / match
4–65
pass range (matches)
1–4
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (4 at the low end, 65 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

65 tracked carries (12.2/90, 10 progressive, 557m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%8%25%17%5%2%9%6%9%3%11%3%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 65 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
8Outside → Inside
37Inside → Inside
15Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (28)Second (17)Third (16)Fourth (4)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Nelson Deossa's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 2.06 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 64%
OUTSIDE 36%
Dribble location — 7 inside · 4 outside
Right Wing
2 · 18%
Right Half-Space
3 · 27%
Central
1 · 9%
Left Half-Space
3 · 27%
Left Wing
2 · 18%
Vision AI 36% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
09

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW6255%3432%208%53%22%1RHS6737%2521%1422%1513%96%4C4626%1211%533%1515%715%7LHS254%14%120%532%840%10LW1421%314%264%9FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the defensive third → the right half-space in the middle third — 1 progressive passes (10% of his progression) at 0.162 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 60% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 10% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

12% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 4 line-breaking passes and 18 final-third entries, -1.5 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%7%10%19%16%3%2%8%8%9%0%0%3%6%6%2%
completedincomplete257 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
257
passes
83%
completed
43
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 83% season completion rate.
04

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.56/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
13

Can he finish?

22 shots · 0.99 xG · 0 goals (-0.99 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  22
on target  10
goals  0
xG  0.99
xG on target  0.87
xG / shot  0.045
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

47 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

17
attacking third (cheap)
23
middle third
7
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 36% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.62 danger-index/90 · 0.297 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

257
passes attempted
36%
mostly sideways
54%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
83 · 32%
Sideways
93 · 36%
Backward
81 · 32%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
115 · 54%
Medium
76 · 36%
Long (>30m)
23 · 11%
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Nelson Deossa gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
21%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
13%
Secondary
Right Wing, Attacking third
12%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Nelson Deossa actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
29151885222130531827504710
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%7%10%19%16%3%2%8%8%9%0%0%3%6%6%2%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
1Cross
6Cutback
13Progressive
24Long ball
21Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
32Outside → Inside
79Inside → Inside
44Outside → Outside
59Inside → Outside
By direction
83Forward
81Backward
93Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.25 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 30% of his 10 touches there are lost (3 times).
30%3/10 lost25%3/12 lost—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few12%4/32 lost23%12/53 lost4%1/27 lost15%3/20 lost—5 touches · too few18%6/33 lost19%4/21 lost11%2/18 lost12%1/8 lost23%3/13 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
03

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 65 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (57%). He carries from outside into the middle 8 times and out toward the touchline 5 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
8 · 12%
Progressive / key pass
2 · 3%
Simple pass
46 · 71%
No clean link
9 · 14%
Of 65 carries, 12% flow straight into a shot of his own, 3% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 14% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
14

Crosses & Cutbacks

1 crosses (0.19/90, 0 completed) and 6 cutbacks (1.12/90, 3 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

15

How & where does he defend?

93 defensive actions across the season (17.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 64% won
5
interceptions · 0.9/90
27
recoveries · 5.1/90
11
clearances · 2.1/90
2
blocks
41
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
42
middle third
37
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 43 proactive ball-wins (8.1/90), tackle success 64%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
16

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Nelson Deossa keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~3-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.5, 3m)
0.30
1.7
0.85
33%
Mid press (PPDA 5.8, 3m)
1.13
5.0
0.71
60%
Low press (PPDA 6.3, 4m)
0.43
1.5
0.36
100%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

17

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Nelson Deossa played nearly every Real Betis match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

18

His Share of the Team

Of everything Real Betis produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Nelson Deossa specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
11%
36 / 342
shots
6%
40 / 693
zone-14 entries
5%
14 / 296
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

20

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Transition runner67%Box-to-box runner54%Tempo controller52%Deep-lying playmaker45%
Why Transition runner 67%: a weighted blend of transition 52 (weight 45%) + defensive aggression 71 (weight 30%) + box threat 75 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
dribbling
Strong
press resistance, box threat, defensive aggression
Average
carrying, ball-winning, retention, receiving zones, transition, creativity, territory (wide vs central)
Weak
build-up, crossing, passing directness, final-third threat, progression, line-breaking, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
98
Press resistance ~proxy
82
Box threat
75
Defensive aggression
71
Carrying
65
Ball-winning
63
Retention
62
Receiving zones
56
Transition ~proxy
52
Creativity
48
Territory (wide vs central)
46
Build-up
32
Crossing
28
Passing directness
25
Final-third threat
24
Progression
23
Line-breaking
11
Through-balls ~proxy
4
21

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 71 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Adrian Beck Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 186 cm / 75 kg
81%
Driven by: press resistance (22%), dribbling (22%), through-balls (14%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via box threat; Beck more via crossing, final-third threat.
Alexis Claude-Maurice Augsburg · Bundesliga · 174 cm / 62 kg
77%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), press resistance (15%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via ball-winning, passing directness; Claude-Maurice more via through-balls, crossing.
Alex Král Union Berlin · Bundesliga 25/26 · 187 cm / 80 kg
77%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), through-balls (16%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via box threat, defensive aggression.
Félix Lemaréchal Strasbourg · Ligue 1 25/26 · 180 cm / 73 kg
76%
Driven by: dribbling (23%), through-balls (19%), defensive aggression (12%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via retention, box threat; Lemaréchal more via line-breaking, crossing.
Joelinton Newcastle · Premier League · 186 cm / 81 kg
75%
Driven by: through-balls (18%), dribbling (17%), press resistance (14%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via carrying, box threat; Joelinton more via passing directness, build-up.
Quinten Timber Crystal Palace · Ligue 1 · 179 cm / 74 kg
75%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), through-balls (18%), line-breaking (14%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via box threat, press resistance; Timber more via passing directness, final-third threat.
22

Summary

Nelson Deossa is a transition runner: 2.4 progressive passes, 0.56 key passes /90, 1 box entries, 0 goals from 0.99 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 10 matches (480 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report