العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Désiré Doué

PSG
Complete forward ST
4.7 shots/90 with 2.18 key passes/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing53%vs 17 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected-0.82goals18%
Placement quality vs xG0.78index65%
Shots on target52.076%
Box Threat79%vs 17 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.43xG71%
Shots /903.8594%
xGOT /900.47xGOT71%
Ball-Carrying87%vs 17 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /906.4894%
Carry distance /90197.94m94%
Successful take-ons /902.2994%
Take-on success45.63%65%
Aerial Threat0%vs 17 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikerpoacherbox threatfinishing
455
minutes
8 apps
1
goals
2.48 xG
2.5
xG
24 shots
24
shots
0.10 xG/shot
11
box entries
2.18/90
11
key passes
2.18/90
19
dribbles
79% won
82%
pass completion
293 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE / MOVE
occupy the box, drop or run channel — mostly in the attacking third (53% of his 293 passes)
2.18 box entries/90 · 11× in 5/8 matches
↓
LINK
lay-off and combine
11 key passes · 82% completion · 293× in 8/8 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
2.48 xG · 24× in 8/8 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
1 goals (-1.5 vs xG) · 1× in 8/8 matches
Signature: occupy / move → link → shoot → convert.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
37
passes / match
2.4
dribbles / match
17–68
pass range (matches)
1–6
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (17 at the low end, 68 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

105 tracked carries (20.8/90, 19 progressive, 1073m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

1%3%11%19%7%1%1%2%1%5%17%26%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 105 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
36Outside → Inside
17Inside → Inside
51Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (34)Second (30)Third (26)Fourth (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 3.76 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 58%
OUTSIDE 42%
Dribble location — 11 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
3 · 16%
Right Half-Space
4 · 21%
Central
2 · 11%
Left Half-Space
5 · 26%
Left Wing
5 · 26%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
16

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW7952%4143%345%4RHS3132%1039%1219%610%3C1718%36%153%912%212%2LHS313%13%135%1129%929%9LW821%19%745%3745%37FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 8 progressive passes (15% of his progression) at 0.087 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 69% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 2% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

8% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 23 line-breaking passes and 18 final-third entries, 2.7 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%3%6%9%17%8%0%2%2%6%0%2%6%14%13%9%
completedincomplete293 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
293
passes
82%
completed
53
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 82% season completion rate.
14

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

26
progressive · 5.1/90
18
final-third entries · 3.6/90
11
box entries · 2.18/90
32
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
06

How does he create chances?

11 key passes (2.18/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
9%45%27%9%9%
chance creation (11)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (8)of 11 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

24 shots · 2.48 xG · 1 goals (-1.48 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  24
on target  17
goals  1
xG  2.48
xG on target  2.55
xG / shot  0.103
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
07

Where does he become vulnerable?

57 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

41
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 72% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.98 danger-index/90 · 0.175 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

293
passes attempted
38%
mostly backward
60%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
91 · 31%
Sideways
92 · 31%
Backward
110 · 38%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
145 · 60%
Medium
75 · 31%
Long (>30m)
20 · 8%
15

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.570.540.480.290.240.20
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.57
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.54
Left Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.48
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.29
Left Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.24
Central Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Left Wing Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Désiré Doué gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Right Wing, Attacking third
17%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
13%
Third
Left Wing, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Désiré Doué actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1719424833175221121020255528
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%6%9%17%8%0%2%2%6%0%2%6%14%13%9%
own goal left, attacking →
13

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

11Key pass
11Cross
6Cutback
26Progressive
18Long ball
16Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
83Outside → Inside
51Inside → Inside
78Outside → Outside
28Inside → Outside
By direction
91Forward
110Backward
92Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 2 passes worth 0.57 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 11 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 4 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 29% of his 34 touches there are lost (10 times).
12%1/8 lost—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few14%5/37 lost—7 touches · too few9%1/11 lost22%2/9 lost6%3/53 lost20%10/50 lost23%6/26 lost22%2/9 lost29%10/34 lost24%9/37 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
05

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 105 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (49%). He carries from outside into the middle 36 times and out toward the touchline 1 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
10 · 10%
Progressive / key pass
22 · 21%
Simple pass
50 · 48%
No clean link
23 · 22%
Of 105 carries, 10% flow straight into a shot of his own, 21% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 22% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
12

Crosses & Cutbacks

11 crosses (2.18/90, 3 completed) and 6 cutbacks (1.19/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

18

How & where does he defend?

69 defensive actions across the season (13.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
14
tackles · 71% won
3
interceptions · 0.6/90
18
recoveries · 3.6/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
7
blocks
57
avg action height
27
won high (att 3rd)
28
middle third
14
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 35 proactive ball-wins (6.9/90), tackle success 71%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

44
attacking-half actions · 8.70/90
17

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Désiré Doué keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 6.5, 2m)
1.46
3.3
0.00
100%
Mid press (PPDA 8.0, 2m)
1.99
5.8
3.14
89%
Low press (PPDA 12.7, 4m)
1.52
5.1
1.97
57%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

19

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Désiré Doué played nearly every PSG match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

20

His Share of the Team

Of everything PSG produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Désiré Doué specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
14%
47 / 338
expected goals (xG)
12%
8.8 / 73.7
shots
11%
79 / 708
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Poacher90%Target man90%False 989%Pressing forward81%
Why Poacher 90%: a weighted blend of box threat 87 (weight 55%) + final-third threat 100 (weight 30%) + press resistance 87 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
progression, final-third threat, line-breaking, receiving zones, through-balls, carrying, territory (wide vs central), creativity, ball-winning, retention, dribbling, press resistance, box threat
Strong
crossing, transition
Average
build-up, defensive aggression
Weak
passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Progression
100
Final-third threat
100
Line-breaking
100
Receiving zones
100
Through-balls ~proxy
100
Carrying
100
Territory (wide vs central)
98
Creativity
98
Ball-winning
97
Retention
93
Dribbling
89
Press resistance ~proxy
87
Box threat
87
Crossing
85
Transition ~proxy
76
Build-up
66
Defensive aggression
61
Passing directness
28
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 79 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mikel Oyarzabal Real Sociedad · La Liga · 181 cm / 79 kg
94%
Driven by: final-third threat (9%), progression (9%), creativity (9%). Different mechanism — Doué more via ball-winning, receiving zones; Oyarzabal more via passing directness.
Lassine Sinayoko Paris FC · 186 cm / 81 kg
93%
Driven by: ball-winning (12%), creativity (12%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Doué more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central); Sinayoko more via passing directness.
Christian Pulisic AC Milan · Serie A · 178 cm / 73 kg
93%
Driven by: creativity (10%), receiving zones (9%), final-third threat (8%). Different mechanism — Doué more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Pulisic more via passing directness.
Nicolas Jackson Aston Villa · Premier League · 187 cm / 82 kg
92%
Driven by: receiving zones (11%), progression (10%), final-third threat (9%). Different mechanism — Doué more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
Ibrahim Mbaye Aston Villa · Premier League · 185 cm / 65 kg
92%
Driven by: creativity (11%), ball-winning (9%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Doué more via box threat, passing directness.
Raphinha Barcelona · La Liga · 176 cm / 64 kg
91%
Driven by: creativity (11%), receiving zones (9%), progression (9%). Different mechanism — Doué more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
24

Summary

Désiré Doué is a poacher / target man: 1 goals from 2.48 xG (-1.48 vs expected), 24 shots, 11 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 8 matches (455 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a poacher / target man — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall poacher profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report