العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Renato Veiga

Villarreal
Ball-playing centre-back CB
11.7 progressive passes/90 · 0.9 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending28%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.3755%
Ball-Winning26%vs 52 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.8925%
Ball recoveries /903.0734%
Tackles /900.560%
Duels won /901.547%
Breaking Pressure
no action recorded in any high-press match yet
Progression56%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /903.1936%
Line-breaking passes /900.8149%
Threat added by passing /901.24xT75%
Pass accuracy89.26%66%
Ball-Carrying81%vs 52 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /906.979%
Carry distance /90157.97m83%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
860
minutes
9 apps
757
passes
91% completed
91%
pass completion
757 passes
112
progressive passes
11.7/90
88
line-breaking passes
9.2/90
126
defensive actions
13.2/90
15
tackles + interceptions
67% tackle win
48
clearances
5.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (55% of his 757 passes)
91% completion · 757× in 9/9 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
5 carries · 10× in 4/9 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
11.7 prog/90 · 88× in 9/9 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 33× in 8/9 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
6.7/90 · 64× in 9/9 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
84
passes / match
13.2
def actions / 90
58–110
pass range (matches)
48
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (58 at the low end, 110 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

232 tracked carries (24.3/90, 47 progressive, 2043m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

2%4%18%20%11%6%18%12%7%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 232 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
15Outside → Inside
205Inside → Inside
7Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (89)Second (55)Third (51)Fourth (37)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

3
tackle duels
2
won
1
beaten · 33%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 2 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
2 · 67%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
1 · 33%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 3 tackle duels (33% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 5 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

18%
vertical passes
91×
5%
switches
24×
36%
carries
184×
42%
short circulation
215×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW1100%1RHS1010%130%340%420%2C2734%1224%6534%9225%6714%37LHS3601%411%4035%12517%6236%129LW472%14%221%1040%1932%15FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 9 progressive passes (19% of his progression) at 0.019 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 44% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 25% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

9% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 9 line-breaking passes and 64 final-third entries, 16.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%0%0%0%0%4%16%19%13%1%0%7%15%12%10%2%0%
completedincomplete757 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
757
passes
91%
completed
66
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 91% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

112
progressive · 11.7/90
64
final-third entries · 6.7/90
1
box entries · 0.10/90
32
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.21/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07

Where does he become vulnerable?

68 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

5
attacking third (cheap)
32
middle third
31
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 7% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.70 danger-index/90 · 0.520 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

757
passes attempted
56%
mostly forward
52%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
426 · 56%
Sideways
277 · 37%
Backward
54 · 7%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
277 · 40%
Medium
358 · 52%
Long (>30m)
56 · 8%
06

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.780.760.710.690.630.57
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.78
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
15 passes
0.76
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
11 passes
0.71
Left Half-Space Def third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.69
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
7 passes
0.63
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
11 passes
0.57
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Wing Mid third
11 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Renato Veiga gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
27%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
23%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
23%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Renato Veiga actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
55114937612334120142968323222
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%0%0%0%0%4%16%19%13%1%0%7%15%12%10%2%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
1Cutback
112Progressive
88Long ball
33Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
31Outside → Inside
460Inside → Inside
17Outside → Outside
183Inside → Outside
By direction
426Forward
54Backward
277Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing in the middle third — 15 passes worth 0.78 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 31% of his 26 touches there are lost (8 times).
—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few7%8/110 lost7%13/178 lost31%8/26 lost—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few6%11/176 lost8%17/205 lost12%3/26 lost—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few22%2/9 lost—6 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

126 defensive actions across the season (13.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 67% won
12
interceptions · 1.3/90
34
recoveries · 3.6/90
48
clearances · 5.0/90
1
blocks
26
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
32
middle third
89
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 49 proactive ball-wins (5.1/90), tackle success 67%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Renato Veiga still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 5.5, 3m)
89%
7.4
5.0
1.36
Mid press (PPDA 6.5, 3m)
92%
15.1
12.5
2.10
Low press (PPDA 8.2, 3m)
92%
12.7
10.2
2.33
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Villarreal's output per match with Renato Veiga (9 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (9)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals against /match
1.56
0.00
+1.56
points /match
1.22
1.00
+0.22
goals for /match
1.67
0.00
+1.67
xG for /match
1.85
1.99
-0.14
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Villarreal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Renato Veiga specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
19%
212 / 1133
threat added by passing (xT)
10%
48.9 / 488.0
final-third entries
10%
191 / 1945
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back63%Stopper centre-back20%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 63%: a weighted blend of build-up 70 (weight 30%) + retention 57 (weight 30%) + progression 64 (weight 25%) + press resistance 38 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
passing directness, carrying, receiving zones, transition
Average
build-up, final-third threat, progression, creativity, line-breaking, retention, through-balls
Weak
press resistance, crossing, territory (wide vs central), box threat, ball-winning, dribbling, defensive aggression
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
78
Carrying
72
Receiving zones
71
Transition ~proxy
71
Build-up
70
Final-third threat
65
Progression
64
Creativity
62
Line-breaking
58
Retention
57
Through-balls ~proxy
45
Press resistance ~proxy
38
Crossing
33
Territory (wide vs central)
27
Box threat
26
Ball-winning
25
Dribbling
21
Defensive aggression
9
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 88 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Rúben Dias Man City · Premier League · 187 cm / 86 kg
82%
Driven by: defensive aggression (19%), ball-winning (11%), transition (10%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via line-breaking, territory (wide vs central); Dias more via crossing, retention.
Raúl Albiol Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 82 kg
74%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), defensive aggression (13%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via receiving zones, retention; Albiol more via defensive aggression, through-balls.
Jonathan Tah Bayern · Bundesliga · 195 cm / 94 kg
73%
Driven by: transition (14%), passing directness (10%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via crossing; Tah more via defensive aggression, retention.
El Chadaille Bitshiabu RBL · Bundesliga 25/26 · 196 cm / 95 kg
72%
Driven by: dribbling (14%), build-up (13%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via through-balls, passing directness; Bitshiabu more via defensive aggression, progression.
Montassar Talbi Lorient · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 80 kg
72%
Driven by: defensive aggression (27%), ball-winning (21%), dribbling (16%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via receiving zones, passing directness; Talbi more via box threat, defensive aggression.
Marco Friedl Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 82 kg
70%
Driven by: defensive aggression (23%), box threat (14%), build-up (8%). Different mechanism — Veiga more via passing directness; Friedl more via defensive aggression, dribbling.
20

Summary

Renato Veiga is a ball-playing centre-back: 91% pass completion, 88 line-breaking passes and 11.7 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 9 matches (860 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report