العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Tyler Dibling

Everton
Creative wide forward W
3.86 key passes/90 · 41% in the half-space
right winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
70
minutes
3 apps
0
goals
0.22 xG
2
dribbles
50% won
3
key passes
3.86/90
1
box entries
1.29/90
1
progressive passes
1.3/90
2
final-3rd entries
2.6/90
90%
pass completion
29 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Tyler Dibling has played 3 matches (70 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (69% of his 29 passes)
100% of touches wide right · 29× in 3/3 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
50% won · 2× in 2/3 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
3.86 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 6× in 2/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

02

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

13 tracked carries (16.7/90, 5 progressive, 173m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

8%38%46%8%
progressivelateral/short% of his 13 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 11m, longest 39m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
2Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
First (13)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 2 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

03

Impact on the Team

Everton's output per match with Tyler Dibling (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
xG for /match
1.19
1.08
+0.11
goals against /match
1.33
1.00
+0.33
points /match
1.33
1.20
+0.13
04

His Share of the Team

Of everything Everton produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Tyler Dibling specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
4%
14 / 320
interceptions
2%
6 / 386
shots
1%
7 / 539
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

05

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward74%Transition runner44%Wide dribbler / isolator35%Inside forward20%
Why Pressing forward 74%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 92 (weight 30%) + defensive aggression 60 (weight 45%) + transition 56 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
ball-winning, retention
Strong
press resistance, dribbling
Average
build-up, territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression, transition, carrying, passing directness
Weak
line-breaking, progression, receiving zones, final-third threat, crossing, creativity, box threat, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Ball-winning
92
Retention
87
Press resistance ~proxy
79
Dribbling
76
Build-up
69
Territory (wide vs central)
68
Defensive aggression
60
Transition ~proxy
56
Carrying
47
Passing directness
41
Line-breaking
30
Progression
29
Receiving zones
23
Final-third threat
21
Crossing
20
Creativity
17
Box threat
6
Through-balls ~proxy
3
06

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Julio Díaz Sevilla · La Liga · 174 cm / 65 kg
74%
Driven by: box threat (17%), retention (14%), press resistance (12%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via passing directness, transition; Díaz more via territory (wide vs central), crossing.
Jean-Mattéo Bahoya Leeds · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 75 kg
73%
Driven by: ball-winning (15%), press resistance (13%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via territory (wide vs central); Bahoya more via creativity, carrying.
Théo Le Bris Lorient · Ligue 1 · 170 cm / 65 kg
63%
Driven by: box threat (20%), creativity (17%), crossing (10%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via dribbling, carrying; Bris more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Crysencio Summerville West Ham 25/26 · 172 cm / 63 kg
61%
Driven by: through-balls (18%), ball-winning (16%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Summerville more via box threat, final-third threat.
Romaine Mundle Sunderland · 172 cm / 61 kg
59%
Driven by: through-balls (17%), crossing (16%), box threat (15%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via ball-winning, passing directness; Mundle more via creativity.
Santiago Pierotti Lecce · Serie A · 189 cm / 69 kg
59%
Driven by: box threat (16%), ball-winning (14%), creativity (14%). Different mechanism — Dibling more via retention, territory (wide vs central); Pierotti more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
07

Summary

Tyler Dibling is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 100% of dribbles in the wing lane, 52% of passes from wide — but 69% land inside. 1.3 progressive passes and 3.86 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.22 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 3 matches (70 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report