العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportBundesliga 2025/26

Hugo Larsson

Fulham
Half-space creator CM
47% of actions in the half-spaces
central midtempo controllerprogressionbox-to-box
1890
minutes
25 apps
86
progressive passes
4.1/90
86%
pass completion
1041 passes
19
key passes
0.90/90
8
box entries
0.38/90
90
final-3rd entries
4.3/90
11
dribbles
36% won
148
possessions lost
2.63 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (62% of his 1041 passes)
86% completion · 1041× in 24/24 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
4.1 prog/90 · 86× in 24/24 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
19 key passes · 8× in 7/24 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.90 key passes /90 · 2 goals · 32× in 13/24 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
43
passes / match
1.0
dribbles / match
14–91
pass range (matches)
1–1
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (14 at the low end, 91 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

12

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

168 tracked carries (8.0/90, 29 progressive, 1543m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%7%8%11%4%3%11%23%18%2%1%2%4%4%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 168 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
140Inside → Inside
17Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (52)Second (41)Third (38)Fourth (37)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Hugo Larsson's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 0.49 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 82%
OUTSIDE 18%
Dribble location — 9 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 18%
Right Half-Space
7 · 64%
Central
1 · 9%
Left Half-Space
1 · 9%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI 18% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
04

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW13063%8223%3013%171%1RHS26337%9725%6728%746%163%9C2998%2324%7129%8832%967%21LHS1661%110%1726%4332%5331%52LW4224%1017%760%25FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right wing in the final third — 5 progressive passes (7% of his progression) at 0.084 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 40% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 13% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 27 line-breaking passes and 90 final-third entries, 2.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%8%8%12%7%2%0%7%16%14%3%0%1%4%5%6%3%0%
completedincomplete1041 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
1041
passes
86%
completed
141
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 86% season completion rate.
02

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

86
progressive · 4.1/90
90
final-third entries · 4.3/90
8
box entries · 0.38/90
14
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
05

How does he create chances?

19 key passes (0.90/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
5%11%5%26%21%11%11%11%
chance creation (19)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
16

Can he finish?

13 shots · 1.17 xG · 2 goals (+0.83 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  13
on target  9
goals  2
xG  1.17
xG on target  1.43
xG / shot  0.090
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

148 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

42
attacking third (cheap)
67
middle third
39
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 28% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.63 danger-index/90 · 0.373 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

1041
passes attempted
39%
mostly forward
51%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
402 · 39%
Sideways
350 · 34%
Backward
289 · 28%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
457 · 51%
Medium
390 · 43%
Long (>30m)
53 · 6%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.890.650.470.370.370.33
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.89
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
6 passes
0.65
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
3 passes · 1 to a shot
0.47
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.37
Central Mid third → Central Att third
3 passes
0.37
Right Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.33
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Wing Mid third
4 passes
10

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Hugo Larsson gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Middle third
18%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
12%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
11

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Hugo Larsson actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
143849623523761681513771882881318123
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%8%8%12%7%2%0%7%16%14%3%0%1%4%5%6%3%0%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

19Key pass
6Cross
8Cutback
86Progressive
84Long ball
28Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
64Outside → Inside
525Inside → Inside
108Outside → Outside
203Inside → Outside
By direction
402Forward
289Backward
350Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 6 passes worth 0.89 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 19 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 33% of his 52 touches there are lost (17 times).
29%14/48 lost13%8/62 lost5%3/59 lost25%10/40 lost22%4/18 lost15%11/72 lost11%20/189 lost6%14/236 lost12%15/123 lost20%5/25 lost33%17/52 lost23%12/52 lost12%3/24 lost12%4/32 lost11%1/9 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
06

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 168 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (83%). He carries from outside into the middle 6 times and out toward the touchline 5 — balanced between cutting in and holding width.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 1%
Progressive / key pass
11 · 7%
Simple pass
144 · 86%
No clean link
12 · 7%
Of 168 carries, 1% flow straight into a shot of his own, 7% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 7% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
15

Crosses & Cutbacks

6 crosses (0.29/90, 2 completed) and 8 cutbacks (0.38/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

17

How & where does he defend?

208 defensive actions across the season (9.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
19
tackles · 47% won
31
interceptions · 1.5/90
76
recoveries · 3.6/90
41
clearances · 2.0/90
9
blocks
34
avg action height
19
won high (att 3rd)
76
middle third
113
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 126 proactive ball-wins (6.0/90), tackle success 47%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
18

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Hugo Larsson keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~8-9 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 5.1, 8m)
0.56
3.4
0.80
100%
Mid press (PPDA 7.5, 8m)
1.07
4.7
0.97
0%
Low press (PPDA 10.0, 9m)
0.94
4.1
0.93
40%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

19

Impact on the Team

Fulham's output per match with Hugo Larsson (25 matches) versus without him (9 matches). A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (25)
WITHOUT (9)
Δ
goals for /match
1.56
2.44
-0.88
xG for /match
1.20
0.66
+0.54
goals against /match
1.72
2.44
-0.72
points /match
1.28
1.33
-0.05
20

His Share of the Team

Of everything Fulham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Hugo Larsson specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
9%
22 / 257
interceptions
8%
32 / 408
final-third entries
6%
103 / 1802
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller72%Deep-lying playmaker68%Advanced playmaker (8)42%Box-to-box runner31%
Why Tempo controller 72%: a weighted blend of retention 74 (weight 35%) + build-up 84 (weight 30%) + press resistance 47 (weight 20%) + progression 50 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
build-up, retention
Average
receiving zones, passing directness, line-breaking, creativity, progression, press resistance, final-third threat, crossing, transition
Weak
ball-winning, carrying, box threat, through-balls, dribbling, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
84
Retention
74
Receiving zones
65
Passing directness
62
Line-breaking
58
Creativity
50
Progression
50
Press resistance ~proxy
47
Final-third threat
42
Crossing
41
Transition ~proxy
40
Ball-winning
40
Carrying
32
Box threat
25
Through-balls ~proxy
24
Dribbling
23
Defensive aggression
11
Territory (wide vs central)
11
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 187 cm / 79 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Amadou Haidara Lens · Ligue 1 · 175 cm / 72 kg
82%
Driven by: defensive aggression (20%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), dribbling (14%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via line-breaking, carrying; Haidara more via passing directness.
Lamare Bogarde Aston Villa · 185 cm / 75 kg
72%
Driven by: defensive aggression (18%), box threat (16%), build-up (15%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via receiving zones, creativity; Bogarde more via territory (wide vs central).
Marc Aguado Elche · La Liga · 178 cm / 68 kg
71%
Driven by: build-up (16%), dribbling (14%), defensive aggression (14%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via line-breaking, receiving zones.
Maximilian Arnold Wolfsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 184 cm / 74 kg
70%
Driven by: defensive aggression (32%), build-up (22%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via receiving zones; Arnold more via through-balls, dribbling.
Salis Abdul Samed Nice · Ligue 1 25/26 · 179 cm / 69 kg
69%
Driven by: defensive aggression (21%), build-up (13%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via receiving zones, passing directness.
Rafael Luís Strasbourg · Ligue 1 25/26 · 188 cm / 83 kg
69%
Driven by: build-up (23%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), box threat (14%). Different mechanism — Larsson more via crossing; Luís more via carrying, defensive aggression.
24

Summary

Hugo Larsson is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 4.1 progressive passes, 0.90 key passes /90, 8 box entries, 2 goals from 1.17 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 25 matches (1890 minutes) this season — a reliable read. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report