العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Fran Pérez

Rayo Vallecano
Half-space creator AM
40% of actions in the half-spaces
attacking midhalf-space creatorcreationbetween the lines
195
minutes
6 apps
1
key passes
0.46/90
1
progressive passes
0.5/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
1
final-3rd entries
0.5/90
0
goals
0.05 xG
7
dribbles
43% won
77%
pass completion
48 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Fran Pérez has played 6 matches (195 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (58% of his 48 passes)
77% completion · 48× in 6/6 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
43% won · 7× in 5/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Turn / Beat Man — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: create — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); finish — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

18 tracked carries (8.3/90, 9 progressive, 238m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

6%6%17%6%6%6%50%6%
progressivelateral/short% of his 18 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 13m, longest 24m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
4Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (18)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 7 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.46/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (1)from the right (0)of 1 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

15 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

13
attacking third (cheap)
2
middle third
0
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 87% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 0.53 danger-index/90 · 0.076 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left wing in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 20% of his 10 touches there are lost (2 times).
—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—6 touches · too few20%2/10 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

07

How & where does he defend?

23 defensive actions across the season (10.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
2
interceptions · 0.9/90
8
recoveries · 3.7/90
1
clearances · 0.5/90
2
blocks
51
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
11
middle third
7
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (4.6/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

13
attacking-half actions · 6.00/90
06

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Fran Pérez keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.1, 2m)
0.21
1.3
0.00
100%
Mid press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
0.13
0.0
1.05
0%
Low press (PPDA 6.0, 2m)
0.27
0.0
0.00
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

08

Impact on the Team

Rayo Vallecano's output per match with Fran Pérez (6 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
1.67
0.67
+1.00
xG for /match
1.21
0.94
+0.28
goals against /match
2.00
2.67
-0.67
points /match
1.33
0.33
+1.00
09

His Share of the Team

Of everything Rayo Vallecano produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Fran Pérez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
5%
17 / 336
ball recoveries
5%
93 / 1856
box entries
4%
18 / 447
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

10

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator15%Advanced playmaker (8)14%
Why Half-space creator 15%: a weighted blend of dribbling 50 (weight 15%) + creativity 13 (weight 40%) + box threat 23 (weight 15%) + final-third threat 10 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central)
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, transition, dribbling, press resistance, carrying, retention
Weak
ball-winning, build-up, line-breaking, through-balls, progression, box threat, crossing, creativity, receiving zones, final-third threat, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
86
Defensive aggression
52
Transition ~proxy
51
Dribbling
50
Press resistance ~proxy
49
Carrying
47
Retention
43
Ball-winning
39
Build-up
37
Line-breaking
27
Through-balls ~proxy
26
Progression
26
Box threat
23
Crossing
20
Creativity
13
Receiving zones
13
Final-third threat
10
Passing directness
9
11

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 68 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Dan Ndoye Nottingham Forest · Premier League · 184 cm / 72 kg
82%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), territory (wide vs central) (13%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Ndoye more via creativity, ball-winning.
Wael Mohya Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 174 cm / 65 kg
82%
Driven by: creativity (16%), passing directness (13%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via transition, line-breaking; Mohya more via box threat, build-up.
Alex Sancris Getafe 25/26 · 177 cm / 72 kg
81%
Driven by: creativity (12%), crossing (12%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via retention, dribbling; Sancris more via passing directness.
Benja Domínguez Sassuolo · Serie A · 172 cm / 68 kg
78%
Driven by: final-third threat (15%), passing directness (12%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via transition, carrying; Domínguez more via receiving zones, defensive aggression.
Cheikh Sabaly Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 168 cm / 56 kg
77%
Driven by: creativity (17%), receiving zones (14%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Sabaly more via passing directness.
Chemsdine Talbi Sunderland · Premier League · 175 cm / 70 kg
76%
Driven by: final-third threat (15%), crossing (14%), box threat (13%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
12

Summary

Fran Pérez is a half-space creator: 0.46 key passes /90, 0.5 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.05 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 6 matches (195 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report