العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Rico Lewis

Man City
Stopper centre-back CB
12.0 defensive actions/90 · 0.0 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
105
minutes
2 apps
57
passes
81% completed
81%
pass completion
57 passes
0
progressive passes
0.0/90
4
line-breaking passes
3.4/90
14
defensive actions
12.0/90
3
tackles + interceptions
100% tackle win
0
clearances
0.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Rico Lewis has played 2 matches (105 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (60% of his 57 passes)
81% completion · 57× in 2/2 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 2/2 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
0.0 prog/90 · 4× in 2/2 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.6/90 · 3× in 2/2 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry Out → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: switch play — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 38% of his 8 touches there are lost (3 times).
—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few19%5/26 lost—5 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few20%2/10 lost38%3/8 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

04

Impact on the Team

Man City's output per match with Rico Lewis (2 matches) versus without him (6 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 6 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (2)
WITHOUT (6)
Δ
goals against /match
1.50
1.00
+0.50
points /match
1.50
3.00
-1.50
goals for /match
1.50
2.83
-1.33
xG for /match
1.58
1.38
+0.20
05

His Share of the Team

Of everything Man City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Rico Lewis specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
2%
9 / 486
final-third entries
1%
40 / 3316
half-space entries
1%
29 / 2422
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

06

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back40%Ball-playing centre-back37%
Why Stopper centre-back 40%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 54 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 40 (weight 40%) + retention 36 (weight 15%) + transition 35 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
receiving zones, creativity
Strong
territory (wide vs central), final-third threat, crossing, carrying
Average
box threat, progression, line-breaking, defensive aggression, dribbling, through-balls, ball-winning
Weak
press resistance, build-up, retention, transition, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Receiving zones
100
Creativity
87
Territory (wide vs central)
83
Final-third threat
78
Crossing
74
Carrying
72
Box threat
63
Progression
55
Line-breaking
54
Defensive aggression
54
Dribbling
53
Through-balls ~proxy
51
Ball-winning
40
Press resistance ~proxy
40
Build-up
38
Retention
36
Transition ~proxy
35
Passing directness
1
07

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 170 cm / 64 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Ferdi Kadioglu Brighton · 174 cm / 68 kg
83%
Driven by: receiving zones (16%), passing directness (15%), height (12%). Different mechanism — Lewis more via carrying, build-up; Kadioglu more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Timothy Weah Marseille · Ligue 1 · 183 cm / 66 kg
80%
Driven by: creativity (19%), receiving zones (16%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Lewis more via build-up, retention; Weah more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Djed Spence Inter · Serie A · 185 cm / 71 kg
79%
Driven by: creativity (19%), passing directness (15%), receiving zones (15%). Different mechanism — Lewis more via build-up, retention; Spence more via through-balls, ball-winning.
Nathaniel Brown Bayern · Bundesliga · 176 cm / 67 kg
78%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), creativity (14%), receiving zones (13%). Different mechanism — Lewis more via final-third threat, progression; Brown more via box threat.
Konrad Laimer Bayern · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 72 kg
78%
Driven by: creativity (20%), receiving zones (17%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Laimer more via line-breaking, progression.
Nahuel Molina Roma · Serie A · 175 cm / 70 kg
77%
Driven by: creativity (20%), receiving zones (17%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Molina more via line-breaking, through-balls.
08

Summary

Rico Lewis is a stopper centre-back: 81% pass completion, 4 line-breaking passes and 0.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 2 matches (105 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report