Thin sample this season. Luca Lipani has played 7 matches (226 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 96 passes)
82% completion · 96× in 7/7 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
0% won · 4× in 3/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
1.6 prog/90 · 5× in 4/7 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.6 ball-wins/90 · 24× in 7/7 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
2.4 f3-entries/90 · 6× in 3/7 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Where does he become vulnerable?
21 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
7
attacking third (cheap)
9
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 33% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.89 danger-index/90 · 0.345 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Luca Lipani actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 23% of his 13 touches there are lost (3 times).
41 defensive actions across the season (16.3/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 67% won
6
interceptions · 2.4/90
12
recoveries · 4.8/90
4
clearances · 1.6/90
4
blocks
33
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
15
middle third
23
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 24 proactive ball-wins (9.6/90), tackle success 67%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
06
Can he play under pressure?
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Luca Lipani still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.5, 2m)
81%
1.0
1.0
0.67
Mid press (PPDA 5.6, 2m)
74%
3.7
5.5
0.78
Low press (PPDA 6.9, 3m)
94%
1.0
1.0
0.58
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Sassuolo's output per match with Luca Lipani (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
2.00
+0.00
points /match
1.14
0.00
+1.14
goals for /match
1.57
1.00
+0.57
xG for /match
1.16
2.25
-1.08
09
His Share of the Team
Of everything Sassuolo produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Luca Lipani specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
6%
21 / 349
tackles
6%
35 / 627
ball recoveries
4%
66 / 1626
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Ball-winning
74
Box threat
62
Creativity
56
Receiving zones
49
Defensive aggression
48
Retention
44
Build-up
40
Press resistance ~proxy
37
Dribbling
35
Transition ~proxy
33
Crossing
26
Territory (wide vs central)
26
Final-third threat
24
Carrying
22
Passing directness
21
Through-balls ~proxy
21
Line-breaking
19
Progression
18
11
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 65 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Mads Bidstrup Lyon · Ligue 1 · 174 cm / 75 kg
76%
Driven by: crossing (13%), progression (11%), transition (11%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via creativity, build-up; Bidstrup more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Tim Iroegbunam Hull City · Premier League · 183 cm / 70 kg
70%
Driven by: progression (18%), final-third threat (15%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via build-up, box threat; Iroegbunam more via defensive aggression, passing directness.
Beñat Gerenabarrena Athletic Club · La Liga · 173 cm / 68 kg
66%
Driven by: transition (13%), progression (12%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via box threat, creativity; Gerenabarrena more via defensive aggression, through-balls.
Caleb Yirenkyi Coventry · Premier League · 182 cm / 77 kg
64%
Driven by: crossing (19%), carrying (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via box threat, ball-winning; Yirenkyi more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Oumar Ngom Lecce · 184 cm / 75 kg
64%
Driven by: progression (18%), ball-winning (17%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via box threat, creativity; Ngom more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Florentino Ipswich · Premier League · 184 cm / 74 kg
64%
Driven by: ball-winning (17%), progression (17%), carrying (16%). Different mechanism — Lipani more via box threat; Florentino more via passing directness, line-breaking.
12
Summary
Luca Lipani is a ball-winning 6: 82% completion, 5 line-breaks and 1.6 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 0% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]
Based on 7 matches (226 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.