العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Nikola Stulic

Lecce
Pressing forward ST
4.4 high defensive actions/90
strikerpressing forwardbox threatfinishing
286
minutes
6 apps
0
goals
0.87 xG
0.9
xG
5 shots
5
shots
0.17 xG/shot
0
box entries
0.00/90
1
key passes
0.31/90
1
dribbles
0% won
81%
pass completion
54 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Nikola Stulic has played 6 matches (286 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
1 key passes · 81% completion · 54× in 6/6 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
0.87 xG · 5× in 2/6 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

02

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.31/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 22% of his 9 touches there are lost (2 times).
—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few6%1/18 lost22%2/9 lost—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

30 defensive actions across the season (9.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 100% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
7
recoveries · 2.2/90
2
clearances · 0.6/90
2
blocks
59
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
13
middle third
3
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 8 proactive ball-wins (2.5/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

18
attacking-half actions · 5.66/90
04

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Nikola Stulic keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.0, 2m)
0.02
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.0, 2m)
0.02
0.0
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.4, 2m)
0.14
0.0
0.63
0%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Lecce's output per match with Nikola Stulic (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
0.83
2.00
-1.17
xG for /match
1.02
1.47
-0.44
goals against /match
2.00
1.00
+1.00
points /match
1.00
1.50
-0.50
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lecce produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Nikola Stulic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
15%
5.4 / 36.8
shots
10%
38 / 370
zone-14 entries
5%
7 / 138
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward43%Transition runner27%Target man22%Poacher19%
Why Pressing forward 43%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 62 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 43 (weight 30%) + transition 18 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, ball-winning
Weak
retention, crossing, build-up, box threat, press resistance, through-balls, territory (wide vs central), creativity, receiving zones, transition, dribbling, final-third threat, passing directness, progression, line-breaking, carrying
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
62
Ball-winning
43
Retention
39
Crossing
37
Build-up
36
Box threat
28
Press resistance ~proxy
28
Through-balls ~proxy
27
Territory (wide vs central)
27
Creativity
23
Receiving zones
19
Transition ~proxy
18
Dribbling
18
Final-third threat
15
Passing directness
10
Progression
9
Line-breaking
6
Carrying
5
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Roberto Fernández Espanyol · La Liga · 186 cm / 78 kg
94%
Driven by: final-third threat (11%), passing directness (10%), progression (9%). Different mechanism — Fernández more via carrying.
Petar Ratkov Levante · La Liga · 193 cm / 76 kg
93%
Driven by: progression (10%), carrying (10%), line-breaking (9%). Different mechanism — Stulic more via crossing, retention; Ratkov more via passing directness.
Roberto Piccoli Bologna · 190 cm / 78 kg
91%
Driven by: progression (13%), line-breaking (12%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Piccoli more via dribbling, passing directness.
Hugo Duro Valencia · La Liga · 177 cm / 70 kg
91%
Driven by: transition (13%), carrying (12%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Duro more via build-up.
Louis Mafouta Le Mans · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 76 kg
88%
Driven by: carrying (14%), progression (11%), transition (11%). Different mechanism — Mafouta more via box threat.
Andrea Pinamonti Lazio · 188 cm / 72 kg
87%
Driven by: transition (13%), carrying (12%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Stulic more via ball-winning; Pinamonti more via build-up, box threat.
10

Summary

Nikola Stulic is a pressing forward: 0 goals from 0.87 xG (-0.87 vs expected), 5 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 6 matches (286 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report