العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026
TRO

Junior Diaz

Troyes
Stopper centre-back CB
13.2 defensive actions/90 · 3.7 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending25%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /904.8550%
Ball-Winning49%vs 43 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.3366%
Ball recoveries /903.2630%
Tackles /901.4155%
Duels won /901.5245%
Breaking Pressure65%vs 32 centre-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure89.0%78%
Progressive passes while pressed928%
Line-breaking passes while pressed369%
Progressive carries while pressed1878%
Threat added while pressed (xT)3.07xT72%
Progression22%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /901.9314%
Line-breaking passes /900.4430%
Threat added by passing /900.59xT5%
Pass accuracy87.0%41%
Ball-Carrying32%vs 43 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.5934%
Carry distance /90107.68m30%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
761
minutes
8 apps
307
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
307 passes
31
progressive passes
3.7/90
37
line-breaking passes
4.4/90
112
defensive actions
13.2/90
23
tackles + interceptions
73% tackle win
27
clearances
3.2/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (53% of his 307 passes)
89% completion · 307× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 2/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.7 prog/90 · 37× in 8/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 26× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.0/90 · 25× in 8/8 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
38
passes / match
13.2
def actions / 90
25–55
pass range (matches)
27
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (25 at the low end, 55 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

79 tracked carries (9.3/90, 21 progressive, 790m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

4%11%18%10%8%20%15%10%4%
progressivelateral/short% of his 79 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 31m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
64Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
8Inside → Outside
First (31)Second (19)Third (15)Fourth (14)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

11
tackle duels
8
won
3
beaten · 27%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 73%
OUTSIDE 27%
Tackle-duel location — 8 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
1 · 9%
Right Half-Space
4 · 36%
Central
1 · 9%
Left Half-Space
3 · 27%
Left Wing
2 · 18%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 11 tackle duels (27% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

11%
vertical passes
22×
8%
switches
16×
30%
carries
60×
51%
short circulation
104×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW2100%2RHS1225%333%425%317%2C9012%1142%3810%911%1024%22LHS1383%421%2930%419%1238%52LW3212%441%133%144%14FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the middle third → the right half-space in the final third — 2 progressive passes (13% of his progression) at 0.136 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 33% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 13% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

22% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 5 line-breaking passes and 25 final-third entries, 2.4 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%1%1%1%2%20%16%8%1%6%14%13%13%2%1%
completedincomplete307 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
307
passes
89%
completed
33
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

31
progressive · 3.7/90
25
final-third entries · 3.0/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
10
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.24/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

34 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

4
attacking third (cheap)
16
middle third
14
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 12% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.98 danger-index/90 · 0.494 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

307
passes attempted
45%
mostly sideways
65%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
124 · 40%
Sideways
139 · 45%
Backward
44 · 14%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
64 · 23%
Medium
178 · 65%
Long (>30m)
32 · 12%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.360.360.270.220.210.20
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.36
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.36
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes · 1 to a shot
0.27
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.22
Left Wing Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.21
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.20
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Junior Diaz gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
27%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
21%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
16%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Junior Diaz actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
18444141836614925322234
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%1%1%2%20%16%8%1%6%14%13%13%2%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
31Progressive
37Long ball
26Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
18Outside → Inside
148Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
92Inside → Outside
By direction
124Forward
44Backward
139Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.36 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 31% of his 13 touches there are lost (4 times).
—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few10%5/49 lost6%4/64 lost31%4/13 lost—1 touch · too few10%1/10 lost10%5/50 lost12%10/82 lost0%0/21 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

112 defensive actions across the season (13.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 73% won
12
interceptions · 1.4/90
27
recoveries · 3.2/90
27
clearances · 3.2/90
4
blocks
36
avg action height
13
won high (att 3rd)
37
middle third
62
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 50 proactive ball-wins (5.9/90), tackle success 73%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Junior Diaz still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
90%
3.9
3.9
0.46
Mid press (PPDA 4.1, 2m)
86%
4.2
3.7
0.53
Low press (PPDA 5.0, 4m)
90%
3.3
5.0
0.62
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Junior Diaz played nearly every Troyes match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Troyes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Junior Diaz specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
52%
131 / 250
interceptions
32%
36 / 111
tackles
19%
38 / 204
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back53%Ball-playing centre-back32%
Why Stopper centre-back 53%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 55 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 56 (weight 35%) + retention 44 (weight 15%) + transition 43 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
crossing, defensive aggression, passing directness, ball-winning, press resistance, box threat, dribbling, retention, transition
Weak
carrying, build-up, territory (wide vs central), line-breaking, creativity, final-third threat, receiving zones, progression, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Crossing
69
Defensive aggression
56
Passing directness
55
Ball-winning
55
Press resistance ~proxy
49
Box threat
48
Dribbling
46
Retention
44
Transition ~proxy
43
Carrying
37
Build-up
35
Territory (wide vs central)
35
Line-breaking
32
Creativity
30
Final-third threat
29
Receiving zones
27
Progression
25
Through-balls ~proxy
14
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 193 cm / 87 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mouctar Diakhaby Valencia · La Liga · 189 cm / 78 kg
77%
Driven by: through-balls (22%), creativity (20%), receiving zones (18%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via crossing.
Tiago Gabriel Lecce · Serie A · 196 cm / 88 kg
75%
Driven by: through-balls (15%), progression (14%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via crossing, territory (wide vs central); Gabriel more via box threat, build-up.
Kialonda Gaspar Lecce · Serie A · 193 cm / 90 kg
74%
Driven by: progression (17%), receiving zones (14%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via carrying, ball-winning; Gaspar more via through-balls, passing directness.
Vitaliy Mykolenko Everton · Premier League · 191 cm / 82 kg
73%
Driven by: progression (16%), through-balls (16%), receiving zones (14%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via crossing, line-breaking; Mykolenko more via box threat, passing directness.
Kristoffer Ajer Brentford · Premier League · 198 cm / 92 kg
73%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), progression (15%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via retention, press resistance; Ajer more via through-balls, defensive aggression.
Chrislain Matsima Augsburg · Bundesliga · 193 cm / 81 kg
72%
Driven by: progression (20%), through-balls (17%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Diaz more via crossing, dribbling.
20

Summary

Junior Diaz is a stopper centre-back: 89% pass completion, 37 line-breaking passes and 3.7 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (761 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report