العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026
HC

Mohamed Belloumi

Hull City
Balanced wide forward W
wing 50% · inside 50% — no dominant lane
Capability Analysis
Wide Delivery28%vs 7 wingers
"Does he create danger from wide areas -- crosses and cutbacks?"
Crosses /900.00%
Cross accuracy: 0.0%
Cutbacks /902.3557%
Chance Creation50%vs 7 wingers
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.11xA57%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.86xT71%
Box entries (pass) /902.9471%
Ball-Carrying50%vs 7 wingers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /902.7914%
Carry distance /9068.32m14%
Successful take-ons /902.7986%
Take-on success59.38%86%
Box Threat57%vs 7 wingers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.18xG29%
Shots /903.2486%
xGOT /900.27xGOT57%
right winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
612
minutes
8 apps
3
goals
1.26 xG
32
dribbles
59% won
6
key passes
0.88/90
14
box entries
2.06/90
12
progressive passes
1.8/90
10
final-3rd entries
1.5/90
61%
pass completion
174 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (51% of his 174 passes)
41% of touches wide right · 174× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
59% won · 32× in 7/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive the ball into the final third
1.8 progressive · 1.5 f3/90 · 12× in 5/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.88 key passes /90 · 3 goals · 28× in 5/8 matches
Signature: receive wide right → beat the full-back → carry into the left-foot channel → deliver or shoot. Stop the 1v1 on the right and you starve the chain.
19

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
22
passes / match
4.6
dribbles / match
7–42
pass range (matches)
1–8
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (7 at the low end, 42 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

47 tracked carries (6.9/90, 10 progressive, 465m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%4%28%45%2%4%11%2%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 47 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
8Outside → Inside
20Inside → Inside
18Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (22)Second (14)Third (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Mohamed Belloumi's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 4.71 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 59%
OUTSIDE 41%
Dribble location — 19 inside · 13 outside
Right Wing
12 · 38%
Right Half-Space
8 · 25%
Central
7 · 22%
Left Half-Space
4 · 12%
Left Wing
1 · 3%
Vision AI 41% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
14

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW5349%2636%198%44%24%2RHS2726%737%1022%611%34%1C1822%428%522%428%5LHS633%267%4LW2100%2FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 9 progressive passes (36% of his progression) at 0.186 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 72% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

12% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 13 line-breaking passes and 10 final-third entries, 4.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%6%7%17%22%17%3%5%5%7%1%1%3%2%2%
completedincomplete174 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
174
passes
61%
completed
68
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 61% season completion rate.
06

How does he create chances?

6 key passes (0.88/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
17%17%17%33%17%
chance creation (6)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (1)from the right (5)of 6 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
10

Can he finish?

22 shots · 1.26 xG · 3 goals (+1.74 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  22
on target  11
goals  3
xG  1.26
xG on target  1.81
xG / shot  0.057
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
11

Where does he become vulnerable?

81 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

41
attacking third (cheap)
29
middle third
11
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 51% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.91 danger-index/90 · 0.244 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
12

What is his passing profile?

174
passes attempted
47%
mostly forward
49%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
81 · 47%
Sideways
51 · 29%
Backward
42 · 24%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
52 · 49%
Medium
43 · 41%
Long (>30m)
11 · 10%
02

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Mohamed Belloumi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
28%
Primary
Right Wing, Attacking third
17%
Secondary
Right Wing, Middle third
11%
Third
Right Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
03

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mohamed Belloumi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
15498810251031217374435
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%6%7%17%22%17%3%5%5%7%1%1%3%2%2%
own goal left, attacking →
13

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

6Key pass
12Cross
7Cutback
12Progressive
39Long ball
9Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
25Outside → Inside
34Inside → Inside
30Outside → Outside
17Inside → Outside
By direction
81Forward
42Backward
51Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
09

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs in the final third — 2 passes worth 0.62 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 6 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches from the right hs to the left hs in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 56% of his 16 touches there are lost (9 times).
44%4/9 lost—6 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few30%8/27 lost38%6/16 lost56%9/16 lost—5 touches · too few—1 touch · too few45%24/53 lost30%6/20 lost12%1/8 lost—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
08

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 47 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (43%). He carries from outside into the middle 8 times and out toward the touchline 1 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
07

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
6 · 13%
Progressive / key pass
7 · 15%
Simple pass
11 · 23%
No clean link
23 · 49%
Of 47 carries, 13% flow straight into a shot of his own, 15% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 49% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
05

Crosses & Cutbacks

12 crosses (1.76/90, 4 completed) and 7 cutbacks (1.03/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

16

How & where does he defend?

106 defensive actions across the season (15.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
22
tackles · 64% won
10
interceptions · 1.5/90
25
recoveries · 3.7/90
7
clearances · 1.0/90
7
blocks
46
avg action height
23
won high (att 3rd)
43
middle third
40
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 57 proactive ball-wins (8.4/90), tackle success 64%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

42
attacking-half actions · 6.18/90
15

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Mohamed Belloumi keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.0, 2m)
1.42
3.9
0.78
91%
Mid press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
0.42
1.4
0.00
36%
Low press (PPDA 4.1, 4m)
0.91
1.2
1.48
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

17

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Mohamed Belloumi played nearly every Hull City match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

18

His Share of the Team

Of everything Hull City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mohamed Belloumi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
33%
3 / 9
successful take-ons
14%
19 / 136
box entries
12%
20 / 162
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

20

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward83%Wide dribbler / isolator78%Inside forward74%Transition runner73%
Why Pressing forward 83%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 79 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 89 (weight 30%) + transition 52 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
dribbling, passing directness, through-balls, ball-winning
Strong
defensive aggression, box threat
Average
press resistance, line-breaking, final-third threat, transition, crossing, creativity, progression, build-up
Weak
receiving zones, retention, carrying, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
95
Passing directness
95
Through-balls ~proxy
89
Ball-winning
89
Defensive aggression
79
Box threat
78
Press resistance ~proxy
66
Line-breaking
65
Final-third threat
64
Transition ~proxy
52
Crossing
50
Creativity
48
Progression
48
Build-up
40
Receiving zones
32
Retention
31
Carrying
28
Territory (wide vs central)
8
21

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 174 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Miguel Sierra Sevilla · La Liga · 181 cm / 70 kg
60%
Driven by: defensive aggression (39%), dribbling (24%), ball-winning (10%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via through-balls, final-third threat; Sierra more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones.
Thiago Fernández Levante · La Liga · 175 cm / 68 kg
57%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (25%), passing directness (23%), dribbling (21%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via box threat, through-balls; Fernández more via carrying, receiving zones.
Antonio Nusa RBL · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 77 kg
57%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), defensive aggression (15%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via through-balls, ball-winning; Nusa more via carrying, receiving zones.
David Larrubia Malaga · La Liga · 172 cm / 59 kg
51%
Driven by: defensive aggression (24%), ball-winning (23%), territory (wide vs central) (16%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via through-balls, box threat; Larrubia more via carrying, retention.
Bukayo Saka Arsenal · 178 cm / 65 kg
49%
Driven by: defensive aggression (27%), ball-winning (20%), box threat (18%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via passing directness, dribbling; Saka more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central).
Takefusa Kubo Real Sociedad · La Liga · 173 cm / 67 kg
46%
Driven by: dribbling (22%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), through-balls (14%). Different mechanism — Belloumi more via box threat, passing directness; Kubo more via carrying, receiving zones.
22

Summary

Mohamed Belloumi is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 41% of dribbles in the wing lane, 54% of passes from wide — but 56% land inside. 1.8 progressive passes and 0.88 key passes /90 plus 3 goals from 1.26 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 8 matches (612 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / wide dribbler / isolator — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report