His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (48% of his 60 passes)
95% completion · 60× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
4.9 prog/90 · 5× in 3/3 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.8 ball-wins/90 · 6× in 3/3 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
6.5 f3-entries/90 · 4× in 1/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
15 tracked carries (24.5/90, 2 progressive, 142m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 15 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
1
tackle duels
0
won
1
beaten · 100%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 100%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 1 tackle duels (100% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
03
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (1.64/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the defensive third: 0% of his 10 touches there are lost (0 times).
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Inter's output per match with Aleksandar Stankovic (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.33
1.20
+0.13
points /match
3.00
2.60
+0.40
goals for /match
4.00
2.20
+1.80
xG for /match
1.93
2.98
-1.05
06
His Share of the Team
Of everything Inter produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Aleksandar Stankovic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
1%
2 / 346
clearances
0%
3 / 884
shots
0%
2 / 837
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Aleksandar Stankovic is a defensive mid: 95% completion, 5 line-breaks and 4.9 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 0% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]
Based on 3 matches (55 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a defensive mid — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
