His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
2 key passes (0.74/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (2)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
04
Where does he become vulnerable?
16 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
11
attacking third (cheap)
4
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 69% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.10 danger-index/90 · 0.185 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 40% of his 10 touches there are lost (4 times).
29 defensive actions across the season (10.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
5
recoveries · 1.9/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
1
blocks
60
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
17
middle third
1
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 6 proactive ball-wins (2.2/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
20
attacking-half actions · 7.41/90
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Sevilla's output per match with Lucas Stassin (4 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (4)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
2.00
-1.00
xG for /match
0.72
0.00
+0.72
goals against /match
1.25
2.20
-0.95
points /match
1.75
1.40
+0.35
07
His Share of the Team
Of everything Sevilla produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lucas Stassin specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
2%
0.6 / 39.6
shots
2%
7 / 458
successful take-ons
1%
3 / 337
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 354 strikers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Pressing forward 36%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 65 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 22 (weight 30%) + transition 17 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
through-balls
Strong
dribbling, press resistance
Average
territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression, retention, crossing, line-breaking, creativity
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
85
Dribbling
81
Press resistance ~proxy
72
Territory (wide vs central)
68
Defensive aggression
65
Retention
61
Crossing
48
Line-breaking
45
Creativity
44
Build-up
40
Receiving zones
37
Progression
35
Carrying
35
Box threat
30
Ball-winning
22
Final-third threat
20
Transition ~proxy
17
Passing directness
3
09
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 171 cm / 81 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Filip Stojilkovic Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 185 cm / 80 kg
69%
Driven by: transition (21%), passing directness (17%), ball-winning (17%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Stojilkovic more via crossing.
David Mokwa Elversberg · Bundesliga · 181 cm / 81 kg
67%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), dribbling (15%), transition (14%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Mokwa more via ball-winning.
Juanmi Getafe 25/26 · 172 cm / 69 kg
62%
Driven by: passing directness (21%), transition (17%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Kenny Quetant Le Havre · Bundesliga · 189 cm
60%
Driven by: transition (19%), passing directness (16%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via defensive aggression, creativity; Quetant more via crossing.
Milutin Osmajic Genoa · Serie A · 186 cm / 75 kg
60%
Driven by: transition (20%), ball-winning (19%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central); Osmajic more via crossing, passing directness.
Habib Diallo Le Mans · Ligue 1 · 186 cm / 79 kg
56%
Driven by: final-third threat (16%), transition (13%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Stassin more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Diallo more via passing directness, transition.
10
Summary
Lucas Stassin is a pressing forward: 1 goals from 0.61 xG (+0.39 vs expected), 7 shots, 1 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 4 matches (243 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
