العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Pape Diop

Strasbourg
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
17.6 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure
only 106 pressured-passing actions across 3 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression56%vs 21 defensive mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /903.6343%
Line-breaking passes /901.7457%
Threat added by passing /901.07xT52%
Pass accuracy87.72%71%
Ball-Winning69%vs 21 defensive mids
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.8981%
Ball recoveries /906.7790%
Tackles /902.6176%
Duels won /900.4829%
defensive midball-winning 6press resistancescreening
609
minutes
8 apps
422
passes
91% completed
91%
pass completion
422 passes
25
progressive passes
3.7/90
119
defensive actions
17.6/90
29
tackles + interceptions
68% tackle win
48
recoveries
7.1/90
28
line-breaking passes
4.1/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (63% of his 422 passes)
91% completion · 422× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
3.7 prog/90 · 28× in 8/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
11.4 ball-wins/90 · 77× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
5.3 f3-entries/90 · 36× in 7/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
53
passes / match
17.6
def actions / 90
19–81
pass range (matches)
13
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (19 at the low end, 81 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

79 tracked carries (11.7/90, 4 progressive, 621m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%9%10%13%27%11%3%4%10%8%3%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 79 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 24m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
63Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (21)Third (19)Fourth (16)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

22
tackle duels
15
won
7
beaten · 32%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 45%
OUTSIDE 55%
Tackle-duel location — 10 inside · 12 outside
Right Wing
8 · 36%
Right Half-Space
4 · 18%
Central
3 · 14%
Left Half-Space
3 · 14%
Left Wing
4 · 18%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 22 tackle duels (32% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
21×
6%
switches
13×
23%
carries
51×
61%
short circulation
134×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW3863%2424%911%43%1RHS8220%1626%2137%3015%124%3C1538%1322%3437%5628%435%7LHS821%16%537%3029%2427%22LW3110%326%865%20FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: central areas in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 2 progressive passes (10% of his progression) at 0.067 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 48% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 19% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

9% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 10 line-breaking passes and 36 final-third entries, 1.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%5%6%9%3%0%1%11%18%15%4%2%5%7%8%2%
completedincomplete422 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
422
passes
91%
completed
36
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 91% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

25
progressive · 3.7/90
36
final-third entries · 5.3/90
1
box entries · 0.15/90
13
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

7 key passes (1.03/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
29%14%14%14%14%14%
chance creation (7)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

36 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

3
attacking third (cheap)
22
middle third
11
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 8% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.53 danger-index/90 · 0.476 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

422
passes attempted
37%
mostly forward
49%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
157 · 37%
Sideways
133 · 32%
Backward
132 · 31%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
189 · 49%
Medium
177 · 46%
Long (>30m)
20 · 5%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.350.240.160.150.130.12
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.35
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.24
Central Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
0.16
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.15
Central Def third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.13
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
2 passes
0.12
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pape Diop gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
26%
Primary
Central, Middle third
14%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
12%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pape Diop actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
92330321134878652427232540131
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%5%6%9%3%0%1%11%18%15%4%2%5%7%8%2%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

7Key pass
25Progressive
28Long ball
17Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
25Outside → Inside
255Inside → Inside
44Outside → Outside
62Inside → Outside
By direction
157Forward
132Backward
133Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches from the right hs to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.35 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 7 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 42% of his 12 touches there are lost (5 times).
0%0/9 lost10%3/29 lost5%2/41 lost5%1/21 lost42%5/12 lost4%1/25 lost10%5/49 lost8%9/112 lost10%6/61 lost5%1/20 lost—5 touches · too few14%2/14 lost8%1/12 lost—7 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

119 defensive actions across the season (17.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
22
tackles · 68% won
7
interceptions · 1.0/90
48
recoveries · 7.1/90
13
clearances · 1.9/90
6
blocks
34
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
48
middle third
63
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 77 proactive ball-wins (11.4/90), tackle success 68%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Pape Diop still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.7, 2m)
79%
0.9
2.6
0.31
Mid press (PPDA 4.8, 2m)
94%
6.5
5.0
1.62
Low press (PPDA 6.2, 4m)
92%
3.5
4.3
1.01
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Pape Diop played nearly every Strasbourg match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Strasbourg produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pape Diop specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
21%
44 / 210
interceptions
13%
39 / 291
ball recoveries
10%
140 / 1348
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 260 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-winning 684%Tempo controller62%Deep-lying playmaker61%
Why Ball-winning 6 84%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 88 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 75 (weight 30%) + retention 65 (weight 15%) + progression 61 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
receiving zones, ball-winning
Strong
box threat, line-breaking, defensive aggression, creativity, final-third threat
Average
retention, build-up, progression, through-balls, transition, crossing, press resistance
Weak
carrying, passing directness, dribbling, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Receiving zones
93
Ball-winning
88
Box threat
81
Line-breaking
78
Defensive aggression
75
Creativity
73
Final-third threat
71
Retention
65
Build-up
63
Progression
61
Through-balls ~proxy
57
Transition ~proxy
54
Crossing
52
Press resistance ~proxy
45
Carrying
40
Passing directness
37
Dribbling
28
Territory (wide vs central)
14
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 182 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Rodri Barcelona · La Liga · 190 cm / 90 kg
74%
Driven by: receiving zones (18%), creativity (11%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Diop more via ball-winning; Rodri more via carrying, progression.
Aurélien Tchouaméni Real Madrid · La Liga · 187 cm / 81 kg
70%
Driven by: receiving zones (16%), ball-winning (14%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Diop more via crossing; Tchouaméni more via passing directness, transition.
Jobe Bellingham Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 73 kg
70%
Driven by: ball-winning (20%), receiving zones (20%), territory (wide vs central) (18%). Different mechanism — Diop more via through-balls, box threat; Bellingham more via carrying, dribbling.
Santiago Castañeda Paderborn · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 74 kg
69%
Driven by: ball-winning (27%), box threat (17%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Diop more via receiving zones, final-third threat; Castañeda more via through-balls.
Chema Andres Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 82 kg
69%
Driven by: receiving zones (21%), ball-winning (18%), territory (wide vs central) (17%). Different mechanism — Diop more via line-breaking; Andres more via passing directness, press resistance.
Lamine Camara Monaco · 173 cm / 65 kg
69%
Driven by: ball-winning (26%), defensive aggression (15%), receiving zones (13%). Different mechanism — Camara more via carrying, dribbling.
20

Summary

Pape Diop is a ball-winning 6 / tempo controller: 91% completion, 28 line-breaks and 3.7 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 100% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 8 matches (609 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report