العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Carlos Romero

Villarreal
Overlapping full-back FB
pushes high (x=53) · 0.0 crosses/90
Capability Analysis
Ball-Winning51%vs 33 full-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.9852%
Ball recoveries /904.779%
Tackles /902.4567%
Duels won /900.356%
Breaking Pressure
no action recorded in any high-press match yet
Wide Delivery24%vs 33 full-backs
"Does he create danger from wide areas -- crosses and cutbacks?"
Crosses /900.00%
Cross accuracy: 0.0%
Cutbacks /901.4348%
Ball-Carrying68%vs 33 full-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.2561%
Carry distance /90101.71m76%
full-backoverlapping full-backprogressioncrossing
456
minutes
6 apps
87%
pass completion
284 passes
20
progressive passes
3.9/90
25
final-3rd entries
4.9/90
4
box entries
0.79/90
76
defensive actions
15.0/90
10
tackles + interceptions
75% tackle win
14
dribbles
50% won
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 284 passes)
87% completion · 284× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
3.9 prog/90 · 20× in 6/6 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
50% won · 14× in 5/6 matches
↓
DELIVER
cross or cut-back into the box
4 key passes · 4× in 3/6 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
76 def actions · lost 18% deep · 76× in 6/6 matches
Signature: receive wide/inverted → progress the flank → deliver into the box → recover to defend 1v1. Attack the space behind him in transition.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
47
passes / match
15.0
def actions / 90
18–71
pass range (matches)
12
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (18 at the low end, 71 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

69 tracked carries (13.6/90, 15 progressive, 646m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

1%3%3%1%9%17%36%25%4%
progressivelateral/short% of his 69 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 32m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
13Outside → Inside
22Inside → Inside
30Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (32)Second (21)Third (14)Fourth (2)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

8
tackle duels
6
won
2
beaten · 25%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 38%
OUTSIDE 62%
Tackle-duel location — 3 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 12%
Left Half-Space
2 · 25%
Left Wing
5 · 62%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 8 tackle duels (25% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry outside (overlap) or inside (invert into midfield)? Every carry by channel. Season rate: 2.76 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 43%
OUTSIDE 57%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 7%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
5 · 36%
Left Wing
8 · 57%
Vision AI 57% of his carries are wide — an overlapping full-back who hugs the touchline.
07

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

12%
vertical passes
12×
2%
switches
2×
21%
carries
21×
65%
short circulation
65×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW0RHS425%175%3C1625%456%919%3LHS846%530%2536%3029%24LW1431%13%550%7245%65FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 6 progressive passes (24% of his progression) at 0.054 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 60% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 4% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 11 line-breaking passes and 25 final-third entries, 2.4 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%0%0%1%1%3%2%2%1%4%11%20%27%21%7%
completedincomplete284 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
284
passes
87%
completed
37
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 87% season completion rate.
08

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

20
progressive · 3.9/90
25
final-third entries · 4.9/90
4
box entries · 0.79/90
21
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
06

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.79/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

44 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

25
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
8
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 57% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.36 danger-index/90 · 0.271 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
10

What is his passing profile?

284
passes attempted
35%
mostly forward
60%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
100 · 35%
Sideways
89 · 31%
Backward
95 · 33%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
149 · 60%
Medium
90 · 36%
Long (>30m)
8 · 3%
11

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.300.280.280.250.200.18
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.30
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
3 passes
0.28
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
5 passes
0.28
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.25
Left Wing Att third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.20
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
03

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Carlos Romero gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
27%
Primary
Left Wing, Middle third
20%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
19%
Third
Left Wing, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Carlos Romero actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
113358766229228676111
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%0%0%1%1%3%2%2%1%4%11%20%27%21%7%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
2Cross
3Cutback
20Progressive
14Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
77Outside → Inside
79Inside → Inside
66Outside → Outside
25Inside → Outside
By direction
100Forward
95Backward
89Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 3 passes worth 0.30 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central, playing it back in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 33% of his 30 touches there are lost (10 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few10%1/10 lost18%6/33 lost—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few0%0/8 lost5%3/58 lost9%7/79 lost—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too few33%10/30 lost15%8/52 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

76 defensive actions across the season (15.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 75% won
2
interceptions · 0.4/90
28
recoveries · 5.5/90
12
clearances · 2.4/90
7
blocks
31
avg action height
7
won high (att 3rd)
28
middle third
41
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 38 proactive ball-wins (7.5/90), tackle success 75%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Carlos Romero still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 5.2, 2m)
87%
3.8
3.8
1.00
Mid press (PPDA 6.3, 2m)
89%
3.9
1.3
1.29
Low press (PPDA 8.6, 2m)
85%
4.3
2.9
1.29
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Villarreal's output per match with Carlos Romero (6 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
1.50
1.25
+0.25
points /match
0.83
1.75
-0.92
goals for /match
1.33
1.75
-0.42
xG for /match
1.77
1.31
+0.46
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Villarreal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Carlos Romero specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
14%
105 / 764
successful take-ons
13%
56 / 417
progressive passes
13%
252 / 2003
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 233 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Overlapping full-back69%Inverted full-back35%
Why Overlapping full-back 69%: a weighted blend of crossing 59 (weight 30%) + dribbling 84 (weight 20%) + transition 66 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 56 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
box threat
Strong
dribbling, creativity, receiving zones, line-breaking
Average
ball-winning, carrying, transition, through-balls, press resistance, crossing, progression, defensive aggression, final-third threat, passing directness, retention
Weak
territory (wide vs central), build-up
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
93
Dribbling
84
Creativity
80
Receiving zones
80
Line-breaking
71
Ball-winning
70
Carrying
69
Transition ~proxy
66
Through-balls ~proxy
65
Press resistance ~proxy
63
Crossing
59
Progression
59
Defensive aggression
58
Final-third threat
56
Passing directness
55
Retention
43
Territory (wide vs central)
28
Build-up
22
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 174 cm / 73 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Andrei Ratiu Rayo Vallecano · 183 cm / 75 kg
80%
Driven by: box threat (22%), creativity (14%), dribbling (11%). Different mechanism — Ratiu more via final-third threat, through-balls.
Anthony Oyono Frosinone · Serie A · 184 cm
73%
Driven by: build-up (20%), ball-winning (15%), creativity (13%). Different mechanism — Romero more via box threat, receiving zones; Oyono more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Vanderson Monaco · Ligue 1 · 173 cm / 74 kg
72%
Driven by: creativity (21%), ball-winning (12%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Romero more via box threat; Vanderson more via final-third threat, progression.
Álex Jiménez Fiorentina · Serie A · 177 cm / 73 kg
71%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), creativity (13%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Romero more via through-balls, crossing; Jiménez more via passing directness, transition.
Maximilian Mittelstädt Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 71 kg
70%
Driven by: box threat (22%), ball-winning (11%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Mittelstädt more via retention, build-up.
Dodô Fiorentina · Serie A · 166 cm / 68 kg
69%
Driven by: creativity (18%), dribbling (13%), build-up (11%). Different mechanism — Romero more via defensive aggression, box threat; Dodô more via final-third threat, carrying.
20

Summary

Carlos Romero is an overlapping full-back: 3.9 progressive passes and 4 box entries, delivering 4 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]

Based on 6 matches (456 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report