العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Chris Rigg

Sunderland
Balanced wide forward W
wing 56% · inside 44% — no dominant lane
right winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
187
minutes
4 apps
0
goals
0.11 xG
2
dribbles
0% won
1
key passes
0.48/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
2
progressive passes
1.0/90
4
final-3rd entries
1.9/90
77%
pass completion
44 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Chris Rigg has played 4 matches (187 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (61% of his 44 passes)
100% of touches wide right · 44× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (4 matches loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: carry / beat man — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); progress — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); create / finish — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

13 tracked carries (6.3/90, 3 progressive, 140m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

31%31%23%15%
progressivelateral/short% of his 13 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
3Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (13)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 2 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.48/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (1)of 1 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 43% of his 14 touches there are lost (6 times).
—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few43%6/14 lost—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

34 defensive actions across the season (16.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 50% won
2
interceptions · 1.0/90
6
recoveries · 2.9/90
6
clearances · 2.9/90
3
blocks
42
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
16
middle third
12
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 12 proactive ball-wins (5.8/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

13
attacking-half actions · 6.26/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Sunderland's output per match with Chris Rigg (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
0.50
1.00
-0.50
xG for /match
0.80
2.01
-1.21
goals against /match
1.00
2.50
-1.50
points /match
1.00
0.25
+0.75
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Sunderland produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Chris Rigg specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
3%
1.1 / 31.9
shots
3%
14 / 511
successful take-ons
3%
7 / 270
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward48%Transition runner28%Half-space creator19%Wide dribbler / isolator19%
Why Pressing forward 48%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 48 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 63 (weight 30%) + transition 42 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness
Strong
—
Average
ball-winning, build-up, defensive aggression, crossing, transition
Weak
retention, creativity, through-balls, press resistance, final-third threat, dribbling, receiving zones, box threat, progression, line-breaking, territory (wide vs central), carrying
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
89
Ball-winning
63
Build-up
58
Defensive aggression
48
Crossing
47
Transition ~proxy
42
Retention
36
Creativity
34
Through-balls ~proxy
32
Press resistance ~proxy
27
Final-third threat
18
Dribbling
18
Receiving zones
14
Box threat
11
Progression
6
Line-breaking
5
Territory (wide vs central)
5
Carrying
5
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 65 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Williot Swedberg Celta Vigo · La Liga · 187 cm / 78 kg
80%
Driven by: progression (15%), carrying (13%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via passing directness, crossing; Swedberg more via box threat, receiving zones.
Sirlord Conteh Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 178 cm / 78 kg
80%
Driven by: progression (13%), carrying (13%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via crossing, retention; Conteh more via box threat.
Santiago Pierotti Lecce · Serie A · 189 cm / 69 kg
76%
Driven by: progression (14%), box threat (13%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via creativity, crossing; Pierotti more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
Pontus Almqvist Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 183 cm / 67 kg
76%
Driven by: progression (16%), line-breaking (12%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via passing directness; Almqvist more via territory (wide vs central), creativity.
Álvaro García Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 167 cm / 61 kg
74%
Driven by: carrying (16%), press resistance (13%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via retention, crossing; García more via territory (wide vs central), box threat.
Jarrod Bowen West Ham 25/26 · 176 cm / 70 kg
69%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), progression (14%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Rigg more via build-up; Bowen more via box threat, carrying.
10

Summary

Chris Rigg is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 100% of dribbles in the wing lane, 55% of passes from wide — but 59% land inside. 1.0 progressive passes and 0.48 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.11 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 4 matches (187 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report