Thin sample this season. Juan Arizala has played 4 matches (103 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the attacking third (48% of his 48 passes)
75% completion · 48× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (4 matches loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: progress — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); arrive — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); create / finish — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
1 key passes (0.87/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 40% of his 10 touches there are lost (4 times).
16 defensive actions across the season (14.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
6
recoveries · 5.2/90
3
clearances · 2.6/90
2
blocks
31
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
7
middle third
8
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 8 proactive ball-wins (7.0/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Udinese's output per match with Juan Arizala (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.25
-0.25
xG for /match
0.78
0.39
+0.39
goals against /match
2.25
2.25
+0.00
points /match
0.75
0.25
+0.50
06
His Share of the Team
Of everything Udinese produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Juan Arizala specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
half-space entries
2%
16 / 941
tackles
2%
10 / 622
progressive passes
1%
22 / 1668
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 433 central mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Line-breaking
89
Territory (wide vs central)
80
Carrying
74
Progression
74
Receiving zones
48
Ball-winning
43
Creativity
42
Transition ~proxy
38
Defensive aggression
35
Final-third threat
35
Crossing
34
Retention
34
Press resistance ~proxy
33
Build-up
30
Dribbling
29
Box threat
24
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Passing directness
9
08
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Benjamín Cremaschi Parma Calcio 1913 · 180 cm / 75 kg
70%
Driven by: box threat (16%), build-up (13%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Arizala more via final-third threat, progression; Cremaschi more via dribbling, defensive aggression.
Jackson Tchatchoua Wolves · Premier League 25/26 · 186 cm / 76 kg
66%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), box threat (13%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Arizala more via line-breaking, receiving zones; Tchatchoua more via through-balls.
Javi Rueda Celta Vigo · La Liga · 177 cm / 74 kg
65%
Driven by: passing directness (19%), line-breaking (14%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Arizala more via carrying, transition; Rueda more via dribbling, through-balls.
Sascha Britschgi Parma Calcio 1913 · 182 cm / 78 kg
63%
Driven by: box threat (15%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Arizala more via line-breaking, carrying; Britschgi more via passing directness.
Michal Skóras Lens · Ligue 1 · 172 cm / 64 kg
58%
Driven by: line-breaking (16%), passing directness (15%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Skóras more via crossing, through-balls.
Rafa Obrador Sassuolo · 181 cm / 72 kg
57%
Driven by: passing directness (25%), territory (wide vs central) (18%), box threat (15%). Different mechanism — Arizala more via line-breaking, receiving zones; Obrador more via through-balls, crossing.
09
Summary
Juan Arizala is an advanced playmaker (8): 0.9 progressive passes, 0.87 key passes /90, 1 box entries, 0 goals from 0.08 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 4 matches (103 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
