العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Patrick Dorgu

Man Utd
Balanced wide forward W
wing 61% · inside 39% — no dominant lane
left winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
196
minutes
5 apps
0
goals
0.78 xG
1
dribbles
0% won
3
key passes
1.38/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
0
progressive passes
0.0/90
0
final-3rd entries
0.0/90
81%
pass completion
88 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Patrick Dorgu has played 5 matches (196 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (50% of his 88 passes)
0% of touches wide left · 88× in 5/5 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.38 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 9× in 3/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry / beat man — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

22 tracked carries (10.1/90, 8 progressive, 268m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%9%5%9%27%14%14%18%
progressivelateral/short% of his 22 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 43m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Inside → Inside
15Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (22)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 1 dribble attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (1.38/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
67%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (0)of 3 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

18 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

11
attacking third (cheap)
7
middle third
0
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 61% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.33 danger-index/90 · 0.161 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 40% of his 10 touches there are lost (4 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few40%4/10 lost12%3/25 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few30%3/10 lost11%3/28 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

38 defensive actions across the season (17.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 50% won
2
interceptions · 0.9/90
4
recoveries · 1.8/90
5
clearances · 2.3/90
1
blocks
50
avg action height
10
won high (att 3rd)
16
middle third
12
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 14 proactive ball-wins (6.4/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

19
attacking-half actions · 8.72/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Man Utd's output per match with Patrick Dorgu (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
1.60
0.67
+0.93
xG for /match
1.96
0.00
+1.96
goals against /match
1.60
1.67
-0.07
points /match
1.00
0.67
+0.33
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Man Utd produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Patrick Dorgu specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
7%
56 / 757
box entries
5%
34 / 703
expected assists (xA)
5%
1.5 / 32.3
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward73%Transition runner56%Inside forward24%Half-space creator23%
Why Pressing forward 73%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 92 (weight 30%) + defensive aggression 55 (weight 45%) + transition 63 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central), ball-winning
Strong
build-up, through-balls
Average
passing directness, transition, line-breaking, progression, defensive aggression, crossing
Weak
box threat, retention, carrying, final-third threat, receiving zones, creativity, press resistance, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
100
Ball-winning
92
Build-up
82
Through-balls ~proxy
76
Passing directness
65
Transition ~proxy
63
Line-breaking
59
Progression
58
Defensive aggression
55
Crossing
51
Box threat
37
Retention
36
Carrying
35
Final-third threat
34
Receiving zones
34
Creativity
31
Press resistance ~proxy
21
Dribbling
6
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 68 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Carlos Vicente Alaves · La Liga 25/26 · 179 cm / 72 kg
80%
Driven by: dribbling (22%), press resistance (22%), territory (wide vs central) (17%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via passing directness, retention; Vicente more via final-third threat.
Abde Rebbach Alaves · La Liga · 176 cm / 68 kg
77%
Driven by: ball-winning (22%), dribbling (15%), press resistance (14%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Rebbach more via final-third threat, passing directness.
Panos Katseris Lorient · Ligue 1 · 187 cm
74%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), territory (wide vs central) (16%), press resistance (14%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via line-breaking, through-balls; Katseris more via creativity.
Ángel Pérez Alaves · La Liga · 183 cm
66%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (26%), ball-winning (11%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via ball-winning, build-up; Pérez more via dribbling, passing directness.
Niklas Beste Freiburg · Bundesliga · 175 cm / 66 kg
63%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), ball-winning (16%), press resistance (15%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via through-balls, build-up; Beste more via dribbling.
Daniel Oyegoke Hellas Verona · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 63 kg
61%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (22%), ball-winning (16%), creativity (14%). Different mechanism — Dorgu more via through-balls, box threat; Oyegoke more via dribbling, press resistance.
11

Summary

Patrick Dorgu is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 0% of dribbles in the wing lane, 64% of passes from wide — but 56% land inside. 0.0 progressive passes and 1.38 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.78 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 5 matches (196 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is defensive aggression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report