Thin sample this season. Noah Edjouma has played 3 matches (84 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Half-Space, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (63% of his 19 passes)
75% of touches wide right · 19× in 3/3 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
0% won · 4× in 3/3 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
2.14 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 6× in 2/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Brest's output per match with Noah Edjouma (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
2.67
1.20
+1.47
xG for /match
2.30
0.00
+2.30
goals against /match
1.33
1.60
-0.27
points /match
2.00
0.60
+1.40
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Brest produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Noah Edjouma specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
6%
10 / 180
expected assists (xA)
4%
1.0 / 24.2
shots
4%
14 / 383
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 182 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Pressing forward 79%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 77 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 75 (weight 30%) + transition 56 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
77
Ball-winning
75
Creativity
74
Receiving zones
64
Box threat
58
Transition ~proxy
56
Carrying
53
Dribbling
53
Passing directness
48
Line-breaking
40
Progression
38
Crossing
38
Territory (wide vs central)
32
Press resistance ~proxy
29
Final-third threat
27
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Build-up
18
Retention
8
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 73 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Konan N’Dri Lecce · Serie A · 174 cm / 73 kg
74%
Driven by: build-up (23%), defensive aggression (23%), retention (22%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via creativity; N’Dri more via carrying, passing directness.
Giovane Napoli · Serie A · 183 cm / 84 kg
71%
Driven by: build-up (20%), retention (19%), defensive aggression (19%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via ball-winning, carrying; Giovane more via passing directness.
Alieu Njie Fiorentina · Serie A · 171 cm / 60 kg
59%
Driven by: build-up (23%), defensive aggression (21%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via passing directness, line-breaking; Njie more via press resistance, retention.
Jarrod Bowen West Ham · Premier League 25/26 · 176 cm / 70 kg
58%
Driven by: build-up (22%), retention (21%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via receiving zones, creativity; Bowen more via passing directness.
Leon Bailey Aston Villa · Premier League 25/26 · 178 cm / 77 kg
55%
Driven by: retention (22%), build-up (20%), press resistance (19%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via dribbling, box threat; Bailey more via crossing.
Saïd El Mala Koln · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 72 kg
53%
Driven by: build-up (25%), retention (13%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Edjouma more via creativity, receiving zones; Mala more via box threat, retention.
06
Summary
Noah Edjouma is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 75% of dribbles in the wing lane, 37% of passes from wide — but 75% land inside. 0.0 progressive passes and 2.14 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.20 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.
Based on 3 matches (84 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
