العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026
MON

Lorenzo Lucchesi

Monza
Stopper centre-back CB
19.9 defensive actions/90 · 0.5 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending29%vs 45 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /904.4558%
Ball-Winning61%vs 45 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /903.0796%
Ball recoveries /903.6860%
Tackles /901.3836%
Duels won /901.8451%
Breaking Pressure33%vs 36 centre-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure95.0%92%
Progressive passes while pressed13%
Line-breaking passes while pressed00%
Progressive carries while pressed211%
Threat added while pressed (xT)1.87xT58%
Progression24%vs 45 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /900.310%
Line-breaking passes /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.43xT0%
Pass accuracy95.29%98%
Ball-Carrying8%vs 45 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /900.924%
Carry distance /9055.59m11%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
587
minutes
7 apps
255
passes
95% completed
95%
pass completion
255 passes
3
progressive passes
0.5/90
15
line-breaking passes
2.3/90
130
defensive actions
19.9/90
29
tackles + interceptions
44% tackle win
29
clearances
4.4/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 255 passes)
95% completion · 255× in 7/7 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 1/7 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
0.5 prog/90 · 15× in 7/7 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 5× in 4/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
0.8/90 · 5× in 4/7 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
14

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
36
passes / match
19.9
def actions / 90
12–65
pass range (matches)
29
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (12 at the low end, 65 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

53 tracked carries (8.1/90, 2 progressive, 363m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

2%8%26%32%8%4%6%13%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 53 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
50Inside → Inside
1Inside → Outside
First (19)Second (14)Third (14)Fourth (6)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

9
tackle duels
4
won
5
beaten · 56%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 44%
OUTSIDE 56%
Tackle-duel location — 4 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
4 · 44%
Right Half-Space
2 · 22%
Central
2 · 22%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
1 · 11%
Vision AI beaten in 5 of 9 tackle duels (56% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

1%
vertical passes
2×
1%
switches
3×
23%
carries
48×
75%
short circulation
160×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW367%233%1RHS1414%243%636%57%1C1574%624%3724%3833%5215%24LHS643%219%1227%179%642%27LW520%180%4FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the defensive third → the right half-space in the middle third — 1 progressive passes (50% of his progression) at 0.058 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is outward: 50% of progressive passes travel toward the touchline — he stretches the pitch rather than combining inside.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
3%1%0%10%30%30%8%1%1%5%7%4%
completedincomplete255 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
255
passes
95%
completed
12
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 95% season completion rate.
09

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.15/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07

What is his passing profile?

255
passes attempted
47%
mostly sideways
56%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
106 · 42%
Sideways
121 · 47%
Backward
28 · 11%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
96 · 40%
Medium
136 · 56%
Long (>30m)
11 · 5%
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Lorenzo Lucchesi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
32%
Primary
Central, Defensive third
30%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
16%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Lorenzo Lucchesi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2121710257778216832
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%1%0%10%30%30%8%1%1%5%7%4%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
3Progressive
15Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
4Outside → Inside
174Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
61Inside → Outside
By direction
106Forward
28Backward
121Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 4% of his 24 touches there are lost (1 times).
—3 touches · too few0%0/9 lost4%3/83 lost4%1/24 lost—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few3%2/78 lost2%1/42 lost—6 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

10

How & where does he defend?

130 defensive actions across the season (19.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
9
tackles · 44% won
20
interceptions · 3.1/90
24
recoveries · 3.7/90
29
clearances · 4.4/90
3
blocks
34
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
57
middle third
69
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 53 proactive ball-wins (8.1/90), tackle success 44%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
11

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Lorenzo Lucchesi still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.5, 2m)
96%
0.0
1.0
0.15
Mid press (PPDA 4.2, 2m)
96%
0.5
3.0
0.55
Low press (PPDA 4.8, 3m)
95%
0.8
2.9
0.57
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

12

Impact on the Team

Monza's output per match with Lorenzo Lucchesi (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals against /match
2.57
0.00
+2.57
points /match
0.57
3.00
-2.43
goals for /match
1.57
4.00
-2.43
xG for /match
1.43
0.00
+1.43
13

His Share of the Team

Of everything Monza produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lorenzo Lucchesi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
11%
20 / 178
clearances
8%
29 / 356
expected assists (xA)
4%
0.5 / 13.1
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

15

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back84%Ball-playing centre-back73%
Why Stopper centre-back 84%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 86 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 70 (weight 40%) + retention 99 (weight 15%) + transition 48 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
retention, press resistance, passing directness, dribbling, defensive aggression
Strong
box threat, build-up, ball-winning
Average
transition
Weak
creativity, crossing, carrying, through-balls, final-third threat, receiving zones, progression, line-breaking, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Retention
99
Press resistance ~proxy
89
Passing directness
88
Dribbling
88
Defensive aggression
86
Box threat
77
Build-up
74
Ball-winning
70
Transition ~proxy
48
Creativity
39
Crossing
33
Carrying
20
Through-balls ~proxy
11
Final-third threat
10
Receiving zones
4
Progression
2
Line-breaking
1
Territory (wide vs central)
1
16

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Samson Baidoo Lens · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 86 kg
92%
Driven by: press resistance (12%), retention (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via crossing; Baidoo more via receiving zones.
Luka Lochoshvili Koln · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 84 kg
86%
Driven by: receiving zones (11%), retention (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via passing directness, ball-winning; Lochoshvili more via carrying, territory (wide vs central).
Isak Hien Atalanta 25/26 · 191 cm / 88 kg
85%
Driven by: progression (12%), defensive aggression (12%), territory (wide vs central) (10%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via dribbling, box threat; Hien more via receiving zones, transition.
Maxence Lacroix Chelsea · Premier League · 190 cm / 88 kg
85%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (12%), final-third threat (10%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via defensive aggression, dribbling; Lacroix more via carrying, progression.
Tiago Gabriel Lecce · 196 cm / 88 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (13%), final-third threat (13%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via dribbling, retention.
Evan Ndicka Roma · 192 cm / 85 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (12%), defensive aggression (10%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Lucchesi more via dribbling, press resistance; Ndicka more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones.
17

Summary

Lorenzo Lucchesi is a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back: 95% pass completion, 15 line-breaking passes and 0.5 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 7 matches (587 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report