Thin sample this season. Dani Martinez has played 2 matches (141 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (50% of his 104 passes)
87% completion · 104× in 2/2 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
3.2 prog/90 · 5× in 2/2 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
50% won · 10× in 2/2 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
23 def actions · lost 10% deep · 23× in 2/2 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
12
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
52
passes / match
14.7
def actions / 90
35–69
pass range (matches)
2
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (35 at the low end, 69 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
15 tracked carries (9.6/90, 5 progressive, 173m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 15 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 52m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
2
tackle duels
1
won
1
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 0%
OUTSIDE 100%
Tackle-duel location — 0 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
2 · 100%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 2 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Does he carry outside (overlap) or inside (invert into midfield)? Every carry by channel. Season rate: 6.38 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Dribble location — 5 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 10%
Left Half-Space
4 · 40%
Left Wing
5 · 50%
Vision AI 50% of his carries are wide — an inverting full-back who steps into midfield.
03
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (0.64/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07
Where does he become vulnerable?
19 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
8
attacking third (cheap)
9
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 42% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.96 danger-index/90 · 0.326 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Dani Martinez gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
39%
Primary
Left Wing, Middle third
30%
Secondary
Left Wing, Attacking third
13%
Third
Left Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Dani Martinez actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
08
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.19 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 22% of his 32 touches there are lost (7 times).
23 defensive actions across the season (14.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
10
recoveries · 6.4/90
2
clearances · 1.3/90
4
blocks
46
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
12
middle third
6
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 12 proactive ball-wins (7.7/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Atletico's output per match with Dani Martinez (2 matches) versus without him (8 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 8 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (2)
WITHOUT (8)
Δ
goals against /match
0.00
1.00
-1.00
points /match
3.00
2.38
+0.62
goals for /match
1.50
2.12
-0.62
xG for /match
1.07
1.71
-0.64
11
His Share of the Team
Of everything Atletico produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Dani Martinez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
1%
5 / 369
progressive passes
1%
23 / 2365
ball recoveries
1%
14 / 1927
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 262 full-backs in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Inverted full-back88%Overlapping full-back54%
Why Inverted full-back 88%: a weighted blend of build-up 92 (weight 35%) + retention 84 (weight 30%) + progression 77 (weight 25%) + press resistance 81 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
through-balls, creativity, ball-winning, line-breaking, crossing, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
98
Build-up
92
Transition ~proxy
90
Dribbling
87
Retention
84
Press resistance ~proxy
81
Progression
77
Box threat
73
Passing directness
71
Receiving zones
60
Final-third threat
50
Defensive aggression
45
Through-balls ~proxy
37
Creativity
37
Ball-winning
34
Line-breaking
26
Crossing
5
Territory (wide vs central)
4
14
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 186 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Jarell Quansah Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 83 kg
81%
Driven by: build-up (18%), territory (wide vs central) (13%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via dribbling, transition; Quansah more via crossing, line-breaking.
Guéla Doué Leverkusen · Ligue 1 · 187 cm / 88 kg
77%
Driven by: build-up (19%), transition (14%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via progression, receiving zones; Doué more via crossing, ball-winning.
Gerard Martín Barcelona · 186 cm / 82 kg
74%
Driven by: build-up (20%), crossing (15%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via box threat, dribbling; Martín more via line-breaking, final-third threat.
Josko Gvardiol Man City · Premier League · 185 cm / 80 kg
73%
Driven by: build-up (20%), transition (16%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via dribbling, progression; Gvardiol more via crossing, line-breaking.
Joane Gadou Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 194 cm / 75 kg
71%
Driven by: build-up (19%), transition (15%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via box threat, through-balls; Gadou more via line-breaking, crossing.
Koffi Kouao Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 173 cm / 65 kg
71%
Driven by: crossing (19%), press resistance (13%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Martinez more via progression, receiving zones; Kouao more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
15
Summary
Dani Martinez is an inverted full-back: 3.2 progressive passes and 0 box entries, delivering 1 key passes. Inverted full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 2 matches (141 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an inverted full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall inverted full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.