العربيةSeason20252026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Ali Houary

Elche
Central midfielder CM
balanced central profile
central midtransition runnerprogressionbox-to-box
188
minutes
3 apps
4
progressive passes
1.9/90
78%
pass completion
96 passes
2
key passes
0.96/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
3
final-3rd entries
1.4/90
12
dribbles
42% won
28
possessions lost
3.96 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Ali Houary has played 3 matches (188 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (61% of his 96 passes)
78% completion · 96× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
1.9 prog/90 · 4× in 2/3 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.96 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 7× in 1/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

23 tracked carries (11.0/90, 1 progressive, 204m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

4%9%9%4%13%17%22%17%4%
progressivelateral/short% of his 23 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
14Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
First (23)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Ali Houary's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 5.74 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 6 outside
Right Wing
1 · 8%
Right Half-Space
1 · 8%
Central
4 · 33%
Left Half-Space
1 · 8%
Left Wing
5 · 42%
Vision AI 50% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
02

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.96/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

28 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

13
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 46% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.96 danger-index/90 · 0.295 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ali Houary actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
813231331913133356
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%4%5%1%6%14%9%8%12%22%11%3%
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 56% of his 9 touches there are lost (5 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few38%3/8 lost—3 touches · too few38%3/8 lost0%0/15 lost6%1/17 lost6%1/16 lost—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few56%5/9 lost38%3/8 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

07

How & where does he defend?

19 defensive actions across the season (9.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
1
interceptions · 0.5/90
9
recoveries · 4.3/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
2
blocks
59
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
13
middle third
1
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 12 proactive ball-wins (5.7/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

08

Impact on the Team

Elche's output per match with Ali Houary (3 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (3)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.57
-0.57
xG for /match
1.03
0.37
+0.66
goals against /match
3.00
1.14
+1.86
points /match
0.33
1.29
-0.95
09

His Share of the Team

Of everything Elche produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ali Houary specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
4%
1.0 / 24.1
shots
2%
7 / 283
successful take-ons
2%
6 / 245
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

10

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 433 central mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Transition runner64%Box-to-box runner49%Tempo controller34%Advanced playmaker (8)31%
Why Transition runner 64%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 71 (weight 30%) + transition 45 (weight 45%) + box threat 79 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
box threat, receiving zones, defensive aggression
Average
dribbling, ball-winning, carrying, press resistance, creativity, transition, build-up
Weak
through-balls, retention, territory (wide vs central), crossing, progression, line-breaking, final-third threat, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
79
Receiving zones
74
Defensive aggression
71
Dribbling
69
Ball-winning
58
Carrying
57
Press resistance ~proxy
46
Creativity
45
Transition ~proxy
45
Build-up
42
Through-balls ~proxy
39
Retention
38
Territory (wide vs central)
33
Crossing
28
Progression
19
Line-breaking
11
Final-third threat
9
Passing directness
8
11

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Pedro Díaz Rayo Vallecano · 180 cm / 75 kg
80%
Driven by: passing directness (22%), final-third threat (14%), line-breaking (14%). Different mechanism — Houary more via receiving zones; Díaz more via final-third threat, territory (wide vs central).
Christoph Baumgartner RBL · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 73 kg
75%
Driven by: box threat (18%), line-breaking (15%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Houary more via dribbling, receiving zones; Baumgartner more via final-third threat, passing directness.
Mathias Honsak Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 188 cm / 78 kg
71%
Driven by: final-third threat (20%), crossing (13%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Houary more via receiving zones, build-up; Honsak more via territory (wide vs central).
Malik Tillman Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 71 kg
70%
Driven by: passing directness (25%), crossing (14%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Houary more via dribbling; Tillman more via final-third threat, retention.
Nelson Deossa Real Betis · 185 cm / 71 kg
70%
Driven by: line-breaking (14%), crossing (12%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Houary more via through-balls; Deossa more via press resistance, dribbling.
Yasin Ayari Brighton · Premier League · 172 cm / 69 kg
67%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), crossing (15%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Houary more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central); Ayari more via build-up, retention.
12

Summary

Ali Houary is a transition runner: 1.9 progressive passes, 0.96 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.93 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 3 matches (188 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report