His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the attacking third (50% of his 32 passes)
50% of touches wide left · 32× in 3/3 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
25% won · 4× in 1/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); create / finish — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
18 defensive actions across the season (14.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 100% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
4
recoveries · 3.2/90
1
clearances · 0.8/90
3
blocks
50
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
11
middle third
4
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 6 proactive ball-wins (4.8/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
9
attacking-half actions · 7.23/90
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Chelsea's output per match with Geovany Quenda (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.25
3.00
-1.75
xG for /match
1.15
0.55
+0.60
goals against /match
1.75
2.00
-0.25
points /match
1.50
1.75
-0.25
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Chelsea produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Geovany Quenda specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
tackles
0%
2 / 861
successful take-ons
0%
1 / 468
zone-14 entries
0%
1 / 481
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Geovany Quenda is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 50% of dribbles in the wing lane, 78% of passes from wide — but 43% land inside. 0.8 progressive passes and 0.00 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.03 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.
Based on 4 matches (112 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a winger — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
