العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026
TRO

Lucas Maronnier

Troyes
Overlapping full-back FB
pushes high (x=53) · 0.0 crosses/90
Capability Analysis
Ball-Winning70%vs 21 full-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.2362%
Ball recoveries /904.0352%
Tackles /902.176%
Duels won /901.490%
Breaking Pressure62%vs 19 full-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure73.0%5%
Progressive passes while pressed1379%
Line-breaking passes while pressed379%
Progressive carries while pressed1078%
Threat added while pressed (xT)2.39xT68%
Wide Delivery22%vs 21 full-backs
"Does he create danger from wide areas -- crosses and cutbacks?"
Crosses /900.00%
Cross accuracy: 0.0%
Cutbacks /902.143%
Ball-Carrying12%vs 21 full-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.3824%
Carry distance /9083.78m0%
full-backoverlapping full-backprogressioncrossing
514
minutes
7 apps
75%
pass completion
211 passes
17
progressive passes
3.0/90
23
final-3rd entries
4.0/90
2
box entries
0.35/90
84
defensive actions
14.7/90
19
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
6
dribbles
50% won
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (44% of his 211 passes)
75% completion · 211× in 7/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
3.0 prog/90 · 17× in 7/7 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
50% won · 6× in 4/7 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
84 def actions · lost 25% deep · 84× in 7/7 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
18

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
30
passes / match
14.7
def actions / 90
7–48
pass range (matches)
9
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (7 at the low end, 48 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

43 tracked carries (7.5/90, 17 progressive, 478m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

16%33%33%12%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 43 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 32m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
34Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (18)Second (16)Third (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

12
tackle duels
6
won
6
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 17%
OUTSIDE 83%
Tackle-duel location — 2 inside · 10 outside
Right Wing
10 · 83%
Right Half-Space
2 · 17%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 6 of 12 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 6 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

08

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

19%
vertical passes
13×
0%
switches
0×
30%
carries
21×
51%
short circulation
35×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW14266%9427%386%91%1RHS1619%331%544%76%1C0LHS0LW0FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → central areas in the final third — 8 progressive passes (20% of his progression) at 0.206 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 63% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 7 line-breaking passes and 23 final-third entries, 5.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
5%17%19%22%19%14%0%1%0%1%
completedincomplete211 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
211
passes
75%
completed
53
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 75% season completion rate.
09

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

17
progressive · 3.0/90
23
final-third entries · 4.0/90
2
box entries · 0.35/90
22
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
07

How does he create chances?

8 key passes (1.40/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%75%
chance creation (8)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

56 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

23
attacking third (cheap)
19
middle third
14
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 41% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.14 danger-index/90 · 0.320 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
12

What is his passing profile?

211
passes attempted
47%
mostly forward
54%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
100 · 47%
Sideways
63 · 30%
Backward
48 · 23%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
86 · 54%
Medium
63 · 40%
Long (>30m)
9 · 6%
11

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.690.440.170.120.080.04
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.69
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
5 passes
0.44
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
6 passes
0.17
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.12
Right Wing Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
0.08
Right Half-Space Def third → Central Mid third
1 passes
0.04
Right Wing Def third → Right Wing Mid third
1 passes
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Lucas Maronnier gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
39%
Primary
Right Wing, Middle third
29%
Secondary
Right Wing, Attacking third
19%
Third
Right Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Lucas Maronnier actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
13131113643484530
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

5%17%19%22%19%14%0%1%0%1%
own goal left, attacking →
13

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

8Key pass
1Cross
5Cutback
17Progressive
24Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
47Outside → Inside
13Inside → Inside
95Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
By direction
100Forward
48Backward
63Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 5 passes worth 0.69 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 8 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 7 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 62% of his 8 touches there are lost (5 times).
26%11/42 lost—6 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few20%16/81 lost9%1/11 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few25%15/61 lost62%5/8 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
03

Crosses & Cutbacks

1 crosses (0.18/90, 1 completed) and 5 cutbacks (0.88/90, 3 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

84 defensive actions across the season (14.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
12
tackles · 50% won
7
interceptions · 1.2/90
23
recoveries · 4.0/90
9
clearances · 1.6/90
5
blocks
40
avg action height
12
won high (att 3rd)
32
middle third
40
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 42 proactive ball-wins (7.4/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
15

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Lucas Maronnier still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
70%
4.2
6.9
1.19
Mid press (PPDA 4.1, 2m)
76%
2.8
3.5
1.67
Low press (PPDA 5.2, 3m)
76%
2.5
3.2
1.00
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

16

Impact on the Team

Troyes's output per match with Lucas Maronnier (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals against /match
2.29
0.00
+2.29
points /match
0.57
1.00
-0.43
goals for /match
0.71
0.00
+0.71
xG for /match
1.22
0.00
+1.22
17

His Share of the Team

Of everything Troyes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lucas Maronnier specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
20%
1 / 5
progressive passes
10%
41 / 424
box entries
7%
9 / 130
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

19

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Overlapping full-back76%Inverted full-back28%
Why Overlapping full-back 76%: a weighted blend of crossing 80 (weight 30%) + final-third threat 70 (weight 25%) + transition 63 (weight 25%) + dribbling 67 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Strong
crossing, box threat, final-third threat
Average
ball-winning, dribbling, transition, progression, press resistance, creativity, carrying
Weak
line-breaking, retention, receiving zones, build-up, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
98
Defensive aggression
86
Territory (wide vs central)
86
Crossing
80
Box threat
75
Final-third threat
70
Ball-winning
68
Dribbling
67
Transition ~proxy
63
Progression
55
Press resistance ~proxy
55
Creativity
50
Carrying
41
Line-breaking
37
Retention
35
Receiving zones
27
Build-up
19
Through-balls ~proxy
2
20

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 174 cm / 64 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Fabien Centonze Nantes 25/26 · 182 cm / 75 kg
65%
Driven by: build-up (21%), passing directness (15%), defensive aggression (12%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via dribbling, final-third threat; Centonze more via through-balls.
Enzo Koffi Le Havre · 183 cm
62%
Driven by: defensive aggression (14%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), build-up (11%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via crossing, passing directness; Koffi more via carrying, ball-winning.
Tom Rothe Union Berlin · Bundesliga · 193 cm / 85 kg
57%
Driven by: defensive aggression (19%), build-up (16%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via crossing, dribbling; Rothe more via through-balls, carrying.
Anthony Oyono Frosinone · Serie A · 184 cm
54%
Driven by: build-up (21%), passing directness (20%), defensive aggression (18%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via territory (wide vs central); Oyono more via through-balls, receiving zones.
Davinchi Getafe · La Liga · 182 cm / 73 kg
48%
Driven by: passing directness (21%), build-up (19%), defensive aggression (18%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via crossing, final-third threat; Davinchi more via through-balls.
Antonino Gallo Lecce · Serie A · 183 cm / 69 kg
45%
Driven by: passing directness (21%), build-up (16%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Maronnier more via defensive aggression, box threat; Gallo more via through-balls.
21

Summary

Lucas Maronnier is an overlapping full-back: 3.0 progressive passes and 2 box entries, delivering 8 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]

Based on 7 matches (514 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report