العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026
MON

Manga Foe Ondoa

Monza
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
15.0 defensive actions/90
defensive midball-winning 6press resistancescreening
389
minutes
6 apps
130
passes
85% completed
85%
pass completion
130 passes
12
progressive passes
2.8/90
65
defensive actions
15.0/90
12
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
21
recoveries
4.9/90
9
line-breaking passes
2.1/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (68% of his 130 passes)
85% completion · 130× in 6/6 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
50% won · 6× in 4/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
2.8 prog/90 · 9× in 6/6 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
7.6 ball-wins/90 · 33× in 6/6 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
2.8 f3-entries/90 · 12× in 4/6 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
13

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
22
passes / match
15.0
def actions / 90
3–43
pass range (matches)
8
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 43 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

33 tracked carries (7.6/90, 4 progressive, 281m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%6%39%9%9%9%6%3%6%6%
progressivelateral/short% of his 33 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
19Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (18)Second (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

6
tackle duels
3
won
3
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 6 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 17%
Central
3 · 50%
Left Half-Space
2 · 33%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 6 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 6 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

07

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.69/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Where does he become vulnerable?

22 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

4
attacking third (cheap)
13
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 18% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.91 danger-index/90 · 0.375 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Manga Foe Ondoa gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Right Wing, Middle third
15%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Manga Foe Ondoa actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2246421619112413202582
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%9%14%19%5%2%2%12%15%7%1%2%3%5%3%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
1Cross
12Progressive
9Long ball
6Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
11Outside → Inside
64Inside → Inside
17Outside → Outside
19Inside → Outside
By direction
48Forward
39Backward
43Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the left hs, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 1 passes worth 0.31 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 25% of his 8 touches there are lost (2 times).
—7 touches · too few12%1/8 lost—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few—0 touches · too few15%3/20 lost7%2/29 lost14%3/21 lost12%2/16 lost—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few25%2/8 lost—6 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

65 defensive actions across the season (15.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 50% won
6
interceptions · 1.4/90
21
recoveries · 4.9/90
8
clearances · 1.9/90
1
blocks
42
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
40
middle third
21
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 33 proactive ball-wins (7.6/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
10

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Manga Foe Ondoa still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.5, 2m)
81%
3.0
2.0
0.31
Mid press (PPDA 4.2, 2m)
89%
2.9
1.5
0.65
Low press (PPDA 5.1, 2m)
80%
2.3
3.1
0.47
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

11

Impact on the Team

Monza's output per match with Manga Foe Ondoa (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals against /match
2.33
2.00
+0.33
points /match
1.00
0.50
+0.50
goals for /match
2.00
1.50
+0.50
xG for /match
1.19
2.03
-0.84
12

His Share of the Team

Of everything Monza produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Manga Foe Ondoa specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
3%
6 / 178
ball recoveries
3%
21 / 711
final-third entries
3%
16 / 581
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

14

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 300 defensive mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-winning 656%Tempo controller45%Deep-lying playmaker36%
Why Ball-winning 6 56%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 53 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 69 (weight 30%) + retention 63 (weight 15%) + progression 17 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
dribbling
Average
defensive aggression, press resistance, retention, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, carrying, box threat
Weak
transition, creativity, build-up, final-third threat, receiving zones, crossing, progression, passing directness, through-balls, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
72
Defensive aggression
69
Press resistance ~proxy
64
Retention
63
Territory (wide vs central)
57
Ball-winning
53
Carrying
46
Box threat
41
Transition ~proxy
39
Creativity
39
Build-up
32
Final-third threat
31
Receiving zones
28
Crossing
25
Progression
17
Passing directness
10
Through-balls ~proxy
8
Line-breaking
3
15

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Samuel Wiafe Genoa · 181 cm
85%
Driven by: progression (13%), crossing (12%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via territory (wide vs central), box threat.
Carlos Baleba Man Utd · Premier League · 179 cm / 73 kg
78%
Driven by: passing directness (16%), line-breaking (14%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via territory (wide vs central), final-third threat; Baleba more via build-up.
Antoine Rabillard Le Mans · Ligue 1 · 180 cm / 76 kg
77%
Driven by: through-balls (12%), passing directness (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via retention, transition; Rabillard more via dribbling, creativity.
Boubacar Traoré Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 183 cm / 67 kg
76%
Driven by: line-breaking (15%), through-balls (12%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via territory (wide vs central), final-third threat; Traoré more via build-up, dribbling.
Gnangoro Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 184 cm
75%
Driven by: crossing (16%), line-breaking (15%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via territory (wide vs central), final-third threat; Gnangoro more via passing directness.
Aliou Dieng Valencia · La Liga · 185 cm / 78 kg
73%
Driven by: line-breaking (18%), crossing (17%), through-balls (14%). Different mechanism — Ondoa more via box threat; Dieng more via passing directness, creativity.
16

Summary

Manga Foe Ondoa is a ball-winning 6: 85% completion, 9 line-breaks and 2.8 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 50% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 6 matches (389 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report