العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportBundesliga 2026

Mikey Moore

Koln
Half-space creator AM
36% of actions in the half-spaces
attacking midhalf-space creatorcreationbetween the lines
392
minutes
6 apps
3
key passes
0.69/90
8
progressive passes
1.8/90
4
box entries
0.92/90
12
final-3rd entries
2.8/90
0
goals
0.87 xG
31
dribbles
52% won
81%
pass completion
127 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the middle third (47% of his 127 passes)
81% completion · 127× in 6/6 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
52% won · 31× in 6/6 matches
↓
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
0.69/90 · 3× in 2/6 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
0 goals · 0.87 xG · 12× in 5/6 matches
Signature: receive between the lines → turn → create or finish.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
21
passes / match
5.2
dribbles / match
6–33
pass range (matches)
2–7
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (6 at the low end, 33 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

55 tracked carries (12.6/90, 16 progressive, 741m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%5%2%7%7%5%2%9%31%24%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 55 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 61m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
27Inside → Inside
18Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (18)Third (8)Fourth (6)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry to create or drift wide? Dribbles by channel. Season rate: 6.85 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 52%
OUTSIDE 48%
Dribble location — 16 inside · 15 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
9 · 29%
Left Half-Space
7 · 23%
Left Wing
15 · 48%
Vision AI His carries cluster centrally — a central creator.
02

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.69/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (0)of 3 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
10

Can he finish?

12 shots · 0.87 xG · 0 goals (-0.87 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  12
on target  7
goals  0
xG  0.87
xG on target  0.89
xG / shot  0.072
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

39 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

25
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 64% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.71 danger-index/90 · 0.191 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Mikey Moore gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
20%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
20%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
18%
Third
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mikey Moore actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
15103741163782184333
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%2%2%2%2%4%5%7%2%1%4%7%26%24%7%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
2Cross
1Cutback
8Progressive
6Long ball
1Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
23Outside → Inside
33Inside → Inside
23Outside → Outside
24Inside → Outside
By direction
41Forward
27Backward
59Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
08

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 22% of his 23 touches there are lost (5 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—5 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too few0%0/9 lost6%1/16 lost19%5/27 lost—3 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—7 touches · too few22%5/23 lost14%3/21 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
07

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 55 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (49%). He carries from outside into the middle 7 times and out toward the touchline 3 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
06

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
6 · 11%
Progressive / key pass
3 · 5%
Simple pass
30 · 55%
No clean link
16 · 29%
Of 55 carries, 11% flow straight into a shot of his own, 5% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 29% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

41 defensive actions across the season (9.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 100% won
1
interceptions · 0.2/90
14
recoveries · 3.2/90
3
clearances · 0.7/90
2
blocks
46
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
24
middle third
11
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 17 proactive ball-wins (3.9/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

16
attacking-half actions · 3.67/90
12

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Mikey Moore keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.0, 2m)
0.68
2.4
2.37
33%
Mid press (PPDA 4.9, 2m)
1.04
2.4
0.60
69%
Low press (PPDA 6.6, 2m)
0.27
1.1
0.00
42%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Koln's output per match with Mikey Moore (6 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
0.83
3.00
-2.17
xG for /match
1.53
0.00
+1.53
goals against /match
1.50
2.00
-0.50
points /match
0.83
3.00
-2.17
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Koln produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mikey Moore specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
9%
18 / 197
shots
3%
16 / 462
zone-14 entries
3%
6 / 189
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator69%Advanced playmaker (8)60%
Why Half-space creator 69%: a weighted blend of creativity 72 (weight 40%) + dribbling 93 (weight 15%) + final-third threat 44 (weight 30%) + box threat 63 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
carrying, dribbling, press resistance
Strong
retention, creativity
Average
territory (wide vs central), box threat, through-balls, line-breaking, receiving zones, defensive aggression, transition, progression, crossing, final-third threat
Weak
build-up, passing directness, ball-winning
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
100
Dribbling
93
Press resistance ~proxy
86
Retention
80
Creativity
72
Territory (wide vs central)
70
Box threat
63
Through-balls ~proxy
58
Line-breaking
56
Receiving zones
55
Defensive aggression
54
Transition ~proxy
50
Progression
49
Crossing
48
Final-third threat
44
Build-up
34
Passing directness
14
Ball-winning
10
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 180 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Rio Ngumoha Liverpool · Premier League · 170 cm / 75 kg
84%
Driven by: ball-winning (18%), press resistance (17%), dribbling (17%). Different mechanism — Moore more via defensive aggression; Ngumoha more via receiving zones, line-breaking.
Kamaldeen Sulemana Atalanta · Serie A 25/26 · 175 cm / 70 kg
77%
Driven by: carrying (22%), ball-winning (21%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Moore more via dribbling, press resistance; Sulemana more via receiving zones, crossing.
Adama Traoré Deportivo · La Liga · 178 cm / 86 kg
70%
Driven by: ball-winning (26%), carrying (18%), dribbling (16%). Different mechanism — Moore more via retention, line-breaking.
Assane Diao Como · Serie A · 185 cm / 80 kg
67%
Driven by: carrying (20%), dribbling (19%), passing directness (17%). Different mechanism — Moore more via line-breaking, crossing; Diao more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
Pedro Neto Chelsea · Premier League · 174 cm / 78 kg
62%
Driven by: carrying (22%), ball-winning (20%), passing directness (14%). Different mechanism — Moore more via defensive aggression, retention; Neto more via progression, final-third threat.
Wilson Odobert Tottenham · Premier League 25/26 · 182 cm / 76 kg
62%
Driven by: press resistance (25%), dribbling (21%), carrying (15%). Different mechanism — Moore more via defensive aggression, carrying; Odobert more via passing directness, ball-winning.
19

Summary

Mikey Moore is a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8): 0.69 key passes /90, 1.8 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.87 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 6 matches (392 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report