العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Basar Önal

Lille
Balanced wide forward W
wing 65% · inside 35% — no dominant lane
left winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
213
minutes
4 apps
0
goals
0.12 xG
8
dribbles
12% won
3
key passes
1.27/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
6
progressive passes
2.5/90
1
final-3rd entries
0.4/90
78%
pass completion
69 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the attacking third (52% of his 69 passes)
38% of touches wide left · 69× in 4/4 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
12% won · 8× in 3/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive the ball into the final third
2.5 progressive · 0.4 f3/90 · 6× in 3/4 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.27 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 4× in 2/4 matches
Signature: receive wide left → beat the full-back → carry into the right-foot channel → deliver or shoot. Stop the 1v1 on the left and you starve the chain.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

28 tracked carries (11.8/90, 7 progressive, 327m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

4%4%4%18%32%32%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 28 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 34m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
4Inside → Inside
17Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (19)Second (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Basar Önal's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 3.38 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 62%
OUTSIDE 38%
Dribble location — 5 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 12%
Left Half-Space
4 · 50%
Left Wing
3 · 38%
Vision AI 38% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
02

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (1.27/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (2)from the right (0)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
07

Where does he become vulnerable?

22 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

10
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 45% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.95 danger-index/90 · 0.210 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing in the final third — 4 passes worth 0.61 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 19% of his 26 touches there are lost (5 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—7 touches · too few16%4/25 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few19%5/26 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 28 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (61%). He carries from outside into the middle 4 times and out toward the touchline 3 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
05

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
0 · 0%
Progressive / key pass
1 · 4%
Simple pass
17 · 61%
No clean link
10 · 36%
Of 28 carries, 0% flow straight into a shot of his own, 4% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 36% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

08

How & where does he defend?

33 defensive actions across the season (13.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 75% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
8
recoveries · 3.4/90
2
clearances · 0.8/90
2
blocks
44
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
22
middle third
9
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 12 proactive ball-wins (5.1/90), tackle success 75%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

14
attacking-half actions · 5.92/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

09

Impact on the Team

Lille's output per match with Basar Önal (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.50
1.25
+0.25
xG for /match
1.23
0.68
+0.54
goals against /match
0.50
1.00
-0.50
points /match
2.25
1.50
+0.75
10

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lille produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Basar Önal specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
2%
0.5 / 24.6
box entries
1%
5 / 544
tackles
1%
4 / 492
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

11

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 234 wingers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward52%Transition runner33%Half-space creator25%Inside forward20%
Why Pressing forward 52%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 68 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 45 (weight 30%) + transition 30 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central), retention, crossing, ball-winning, build-up, creativity
Weak
press resistance, carrying, final-third threat, transition, progression, through-balls, passing directness, box threat, dribbling, receiving zones, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
68
Territory (wide vs central)
58
Retention
57
Crossing
50
Ball-winning
45
Build-up
41
Creativity
40
Press resistance ~proxy
36
Carrying
33
Final-third threat
32
Transition ~proxy
30
Progression
27
Through-balls ~proxy
24
Passing directness
21
Box threat
20
Dribbling
8
Receiving zones
5
Line-breaking
3
12

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 173 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Pontus Almqvist Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 183 cm / 67 kg
83%
Driven by: dribbling (15%), line-breaking (14%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Önal more via retention; Almqvist more via receiving zones, ball-winning.
Nicolò Cambiaghi Bologna · Serie A · 173 cm / 66 kg
82%
Driven by: receiving zones (20%), dribbling (14%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Cambiaghi more via ball-winning, line-breaking.
David Okereke Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 182 cm / 75 kg
80%
Driven by: receiving zones (14%), line-breaking (13%), transition (13%). Different mechanism — Önal more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning; Okereke more via retention, dribbling.
David Mella Deportivo · La Liga · 169 cm / 65 kg
74%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), receiving zones (12%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Önal more via retention, crossing.
Iván Azón Getafe · La Liga · 182 cm / 79 kg
71%
Driven by: dribbling (14%), line-breaking (14%), receiving zones (13%). Different mechanism — Önal more via territory (wide vs central), retention; Azón more via passing directness, box threat.
Joel Mvuka Lorient 25/26 · 176 cm / 66 kg
70%
Driven by: receiving zones (18%), line-breaking (17%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Önal more via crossing, creativity; Mvuka more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
13

Summary

Basar Önal is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 38% of dribbles in the wing lane, 74% of passes from wide — but 41% land inside. 2.5 progressive passes and 1.27 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.12 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 4 matches (213 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report