العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026
COV

Caleb Yirenkyi

Coventry
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
17.6 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure58%vs 20 defensive mids
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure81.0%50%
Progressive passes while pressed880%
Line-breaking passes while pressed265%
Progressive carries while pressed235%
Threat added while pressed (xT)1.51xT60%
Progression15%vs 23 defensive mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.254%
Line-breaking passes /900.754%
Threat added by passing /900.46xT0%
Pass accuracy83.63%52%
Ball-Winning56%vs 23 defensive mids
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.583%
Ball recoveries /905.0657%
Tackles /901.120%
Duels won /901.6983%
defensive midball-winning 6press resistancescreening
480
minutes
8 apps
171
passes
84% completed
84%
pass completion
171 passes
8
progressive passes
1.5/90
94
defensive actions
17.6/90
14
tackles + interceptions
33% tackle win
27
recoveries
5.1/90
14
line-breaking passes
2.6/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (61% of his 171 passes)
84% completion · 171× in 8/8 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
25% won · 8× in 3/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
1.5 prog/90 · 14× in 5/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
7.7 ball-wins/90 · 41× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
2.4 f3-entries/90 · 13× in 4/8 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
15

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
21
passes / match
17.6
def actions / 90
5–40
pass range (matches)
6
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (5 at the low end, 40 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

29 tracked carries (5.4/90, 6 progressive, 251m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%7%21%10%14%10%14%10%3%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 29 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 31m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
19Inside → Inside
8Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (17)Second (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

6
tackle duels
2
won
4
beaten · 67%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 4 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 33%
Right Half-Space
2 · 33%
Central
1 · 17%
Left Half-Space
1 · 17%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 4 of 6 tackle duels (67% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 1.50 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 25%
Right Half-Space
1 · 12%
Central
3 · 38%
Left Half-Space
2 · 25%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI 75% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
7×
0%
switches
0×
24%
carries
17×
66%
short circulation
47×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball; he almost never carries (17×), so pressing his passing lanes beats pressing him.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4450%2245%202%12%1RHS3724%938%1432%123%13%1C368%328%1047%178%38%3LHS264%123%650%1323%6LW0FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the final third — 3 progressive passes (25% of his progression) at 0.097 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 67% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 8% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 3% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 4 line-breaking passes and 13 final-third entries, -0.6 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%8%11%21%11%3%1%5%14%6%3%1%3%4%4%3%1%
completedincomplete171 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
171
passes
84%
completed
28
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
09

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.75/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%25%25%25%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
04

Where does he become vulnerable?

34 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

8
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 24% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.24 danger-index/90 · 0.351 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

171
passes attempted
37%
mostly backward
66%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
61 · 36%
Sideways
46 · 27%
Backward
64 · 37%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
94 · 66%
Medium
43 · 30%
Long (>30m)
6 · 4%
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Caleb Yirenkyi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
18%
Primary
Central, Middle third
17%
Secondary
Right Wing, Middle third
16%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Caleb Yirenkyi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1587611102510614141937196
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%8%11%21%11%3%1%5%14%6%3%1%3%4%4%3%1%
own goal left, attacking →
10

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
2Cross
8Progressive
14Long ball
2Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
21Outside → Inside
77Inside → Inside
23Outside → Outside
22Inside → Outside
By direction
61Forward
64Backward
46Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right hs in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.16 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 29% of his 28 touches there are lost (8 times).
25%2/8 lost10%1/10 lost—6 touches · too few0%0/8 lost—0 touches · too few17%5/30 lost29%8/28 lost10%3/31 lost19%3/16 lost—0 touches · too few19%3/16 lost11%1/9 lost—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

11

How & where does he defend?

94 defensive actions across the season (17.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 33% won
8
interceptions · 1.5/90
27
recoveries · 5.1/90
6
clearances · 1.1/90
5
blocks
40
avg action height
10
won high (att 3rd)
44
middle third
40
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 41 proactive ball-wins (7.7/90), tackle success 33%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
12

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Caleb Yirenkyi still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 2.8, 2m)
50%
0.0
4.7
0.17
Mid press (PPDA 3.2, 2m)
94%
3.3
0.7
0.51
Low press (PPDA 5.0, 4m)
86%
0.9
3.1
0.50
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

13

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Caleb Yirenkyi played nearly every Coventry match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

14

His Share of the Team

Of everything Coventry produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Caleb Yirenkyi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
6%
8 / 137
ball recoveries
4%
27 / 626
zone-14 entries
4%
4 / 102
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

16

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-winning 651%Tempo controller31%Deep-lying playmaker27%
Why Ball-winning 6 51%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 77 (weight 30%) + ball-winning 46 (weight 40%) + retention 41 (weight 15%) + progression 18 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
defensive aggression
Average
territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, build-up, retention
Weak
receiving zones, press resistance, creativity, line-breaking, transition, dribbling, progression, final-third threat, carrying, crossing, box threat, through-balls, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
77
Territory (wide vs central)
65
Ball-winning
46
Build-up
41
Retention
41
Receiving zones
39
Press resistance ~proxy
36
Creativity
34
Line-breaking
28
Transition ~proxy
24
Dribbling
24
Progression
18
Final-third threat
15
Carrying
12
Crossing
6
Box threat
6
Through-balls ~proxy
4
Passing directness
4
17

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 182 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mads Bidstrup Lyon · Ligue 1 · 174 cm / 75 kg
82%
Driven by: crossing (16%), transition (11%), passing directness (9%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via build-up, line-breaking; Bidstrup more via box threat, ball-winning.
Beñat Gerenabarrena Athletic Club · La Liga · 173 cm / 68 kg
80%
Driven by: box threat (13%), transition (12%), passing directness (10%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via press resistance, dribbling; Gerenabarrena more via through-balls, crossing.
Florentino Ipswich · 184 cm / 74 kg
74%
Driven by: box threat (20%), carrying (15%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via territory (wide vs central); Florentino more via passing directness, crossing.
Frank Onyeka Coventry · 183 cm / 70 kg
67%
Driven by: crossing (19%), box threat (13%), carrying (9%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via defensive aggression, receiving zones; Onyeka more via passing directness.
Djibril Coulibaly Nice · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 76 kg
67%
Driven by: passing directness (14%), through-balls (13%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones; Coulibaly more via crossing, box threat.
João Palhinha Tottenham 25/26 · 190 cm / 84 kg
67%
Driven by: crossing (25%), carrying (11%), transition (10%). Different mechanism — Yirenkyi more via creativity, receiving zones; Palhinha more via box threat, passing directness.
18

Summary

Caleb Yirenkyi is a ball-winning 6: 84% completion, 14 line-breaks and 1.5 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 25% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 8 matches (480 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report