His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — wide or inverted — mostly in the attacking third (52% of his 44 passes)
84% completion · 44× in 1/1 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
1.7 prog/90 · 1× in 1/1 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
33% won · 3× in 1/1 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
7 def actions · lost 11% deep · 7× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 30% of his 20 touches there are lost (6 times).
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Troyes's output per match with Yvann Titi (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals against /match
0.00
2.29
-2.29
points /match
1.00
0.57
+0.43
goals for /match
0.00
0.71
-0.71
xG for /match
0.48
0.00
+0.48
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Troyes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Yvann Titi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
2%
1 / 57
shots
1%
1 / 102
ball recoveries
1%
3 / 461
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Yvann Titi is a full-back: 1.7 progressive passes and 0 box entries, delivering 0 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (54 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
