العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Dominik Drobnic

Parma Calcio 1913
Stopper centre-back CB
13.6 defensive actions/90 · 3.2 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
337
minutes
4 apps
140
passes
81% completed
81%
pass completion
140 passes
12
progressive passes
3.2/90
23
line-breaking passes
6.1/90
51
defensive actions
13.6/90
7
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
17
clearances
4.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Dominik Drobnic has played 4 matches (337 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 140 passes)
81% completion · 140× in 4/4 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.2 prog/90 · 23× in 4/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.4/90 · 9× in 3/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
12

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
35
passes / match
13.6
def actions / 90
26–43
pass range (matches)
17
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (26 at the low end, 43 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

36 tracked carries (9.6/90, 4 progressive, 293m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

8%14%8%6%8%28%19%8%
progressivelateral/short% of his 36 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
19Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (13)Second (12)Third (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

4
tackle duels
2
won
2
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Tackle-duel location — 3 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
3 · 75%
Left Wing
1 · 25%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 4 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

08

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

26 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

2
attacking third (cheap)
10
middle third
14
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 8% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.78 danger-index/90 · 0.544 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Dominik Drobnic gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
21%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
19%
Third
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Dominik Drobnic actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
123940133381342111
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%2%6%9%3%1%1%9%28%29%9%2%
own goal left, attacking →
07

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

12Progressive
23Long ball
2Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
21Outside → Inside
55Inside → Inside
20Outside → Outside
18Inside → Outside
By direction
73Forward
25Backward
42Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 3 passes worth 0.33 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 36% of his 25 touches there are lost (9 times).
—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few10%1/10 lost15%4/26 lost36%9/25 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few0%0/10 lost9%3/32 lost24%7/29 lost—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

51 defensive actions across the season (13.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 50% won
3
interceptions · 0.8/90
4
recoveries · 1.1/90
17
clearances · 4.5/90
2
blocks
28
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
17
middle third
32
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 11 proactive ball-wins (2.9/90), tackle success 50%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

10

Impact on the Team

Parma Calcio 1913's output per match with Dominik Drobnic (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
1.75
+0.25
points /match
0.75
0.25
+0.50
goals for /match
0.75
0.50
+0.25
xG for /match
0.88
0.76
+0.12
11

His Share of the Team

Of everything Parma Calcio 1913 produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Dominik Drobnic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
2%
17 / 1007
interceptions
1%
3 / 306
final-third entries
1%
9 / 1131
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

13

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 585 centre-backs in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back21%Ball-playing centre-back17%
Why Stopper centre-back 21%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 49 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 17 (weight 40%) + retention 18 (weight 15%) + transition 22 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
territory (wide vs central)
Average
passing directness, defensive aggression, build-up
Weak
crossing, final-third threat, transition, retention, creativity, carrying, ball-winning, through-balls, box threat, press resistance, receiving zones, progression, dribbling, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
74
Passing directness
51
Defensive aggression
49
Build-up
44
Crossing
35
Final-third threat
29
Transition ~proxy
22
Retention
18
Creativity
18
Carrying
17
Ball-winning
17
Through-balls ~proxy
13
Box threat
13
Press resistance ~proxy
13
Receiving zones
12
Progression
11
Dribbling
11
Line-breaking
2
14

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 194 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Ethan Pinnock Coventry · Premier League · 194 cm / 79 kg
90%
Driven by: transition (12%), progression (12%), carrying (10%). Different mechanism — Pinnock more via dribbling, press resistance.
Joe Worrall Burnley · Premier League 25/26 · 193 cm / 64 kg
90%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), progression (9%), ball-winning (9%). Different mechanism — Drobnic more via territory (wide vs central), final-third threat; Worrall more via passing directness.
Saba Sazonov Getafe · La Liga · 192 cm / 82 kg
88%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), transition (11%), dribbling (10%). Different mechanism — Drobnic more via passing directness, territory (wide vs central); Sazonov more via line-breaking, ball-winning.
Vanja Drkusic Espanyol · La Liga · 188 cm / 80 kg
88%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), transition (10%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Drobnic more via passing directness, final-third threat; Drkusic more via ball-winning, creativity.
Manu Hernando Racing Santander · La Liga · 182 cm / 71 kg
87%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), progression (10%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Drobnic more via final-third threat, territory (wide vs central); Hernando more via passing directness, box threat.
Zeno Van den Bosch Union Berlin · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 78 kg
87%
Driven by: transition (11%), progression (10%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Drobnic more via territory (wide vs central), crossing; Bosch more via dribbling, ball-winning.
15

Summary

Dominik Drobnic is a stopper centre-back: 81% pass completion, 23 line-breaking passes and 3.2 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 4 matches (337 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is ball-winning — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report