العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Ifeanyi Ndukwe

Levante
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.6 progressive passes/90 · 0.2 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending46%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /906.692%
Ball-Winning33%vs 52 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.62%
Ball recoveries /903.866%
Tackles /901.06%
Duels won /901.658%
Breaking Pressure
only 60 pressured-passing actions across 3 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression26%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.825%
Line-breaking passes /900.22%
Threat added by passing /900.76xT13%
Pass accuracy89.24%64%
Ball-Carrying90%vs 52 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /909.492%
Carry distance /90169.34m87%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
450
minutes
6 apps
251
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
251 passes
28
progressive passes
5.6/90
16
line-breaking passes
3.2/90
90
defensive actions
18.0/90
8
tackles + interceptions
80% tackle win
33
clearances
6.6/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (51% of his 251 passes)
89% completion · 251× in 6/6 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.6 prog/90 · 16× in 5/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.2/90 · 11× in 4/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
42
passes / match
18.0
def actions / 90
9–81
pass range (matches)
33
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (9 at the low end, 81 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

79 tracked carries (15.8/90, 31 progressive, 847m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%1%4%5%13%3%9%32%27%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 79 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
51Inside → Inside
14Outside → Outside
7Inside → Outside
First (35)Second (25)Third (14)Fourth (5)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

5
tackle duels
4
won
1
beaten · 20%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 40%
OUTSIDE 60%
Tackle-duel location — 2 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
1 · 20%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
2 · 40%
Left Wing
2 · 40%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 5 tackle duels (20% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

13%
vertical passes
25×
1%
switches
1×
38%
carries
73×
48%
short circulation
93×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW425%125%150%2RHS450%225%125%1C417%312%551%2117%712%5LHS1286%835%4522%2837%47LW4726%1245%2130%14FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → the left half-space in the middle third — 6 progressive passes (43% of his progression) at 0.041 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

Inward (14%) and outward (14%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 1 line-breaking passes and 11 final-third entries, 2.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%3%0%2%13%9%4%0%9%23%25%10%
completedincomplete251 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
251
passes
89%
completed
27
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

28
progressive · 5.6/90
11
final-third entries · 2.2/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
21
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

27 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

2
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
13
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 7% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.72 danger-index/90 · 0.504 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

251
passes attempted
43%
mostly forward
61%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
107 · 43%
Sideways
78 · 31%
Backward
66 · 26%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
81 · 36%
Medium
136 · 61%
Long (>30m)
7 · 3%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.480.360.200.190.160.14
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.48
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
6 passes
0.36
Left Wing Def third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.20
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.19
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.16
Central Def third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.14
Left Wing Def third → Left Wing Mid third
2 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Ifeanyi Ndukwe gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
30%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
24%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
12%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ifeanyi Ndukwe actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2258632563322112271
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%0%2%13%9%4%0%9%23%25%10%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Cutback
28Progressive
16Long ball
1Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
36Outside → Inside
116Inside → Inside
15Outside → Outside
57Inside → Outside
By direction
107Forward
66Backward
78Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 6 passes worth 0.48 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 23% of his 30 touches there are lost (7 times).
—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too few10%3/31 lost7%4/60 lost11%3/27 lost—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few7%1/14 lost5%4/76 lost23%7/30 lost—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

90 defensive actions across the season (18.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
5
tackles · 80% won
3
interceptions · 0.6/90
19
recoveries · 3.8/90
33
clearances · 6.6/90
4
blocks
33
avg action height
9
won high (att 3rd)
26
middle third
55
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 27 proactive ball-wins (5.4/90), tackle success 80%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Ifeanyi Ndukwe still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.5, 2m)
87%
4.3
2.9
0.43
Mid press (PPDA 4.9, 2m)
89%
6.0
2.7
0.95
Low press (PPDA 6.1, 2m)
90%
6.2
3.8
0.84
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Levante's output per match with Ifeanyi Ndukwe (6 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
2.33
1.25
+1.08
points /match
0.83
1.25
-0.42
goals for /match
1.83
1.25
+0.58
xG for /match
1.24
0.92
+0.32
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Levante produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ifeanyi Ndukwe specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
6%
1 / 16
clearances
3%
33 / 968
ball recoveries
1%
19 / 1417
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back58%Ball-playing centre-back51%
Why Stopper centre-back 58%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 80 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 32 (weight 40%) + retention 53 (weight 15%) + transition 65 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
defensive aggression, carrying, build-up
Average
territory (wide vs central), transition, retention, progression, crossing
Weak
box threat, ball-winning, press resistance, receiving zones, final-third threat, through-balls, creativity, passing directness, dribbling, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
80
Carrying
76
Build-up
71
Territory (wide vs central)
67
Transition ~proxy
65
Retention
53
Progression
42
Crossing
40
Box threat
35
Ball-winning
32
Press resistance ~proxy
24
Receiving zones
21
Final-third threat
16
Through-balls ~proxy
15
Creativity
14
Passing directness
11
Dribbling
7
Line-breaking
7
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 198 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Emmanuel Biumla Angers · Ligue 1 · 185 cm / 75 kg
75%
Driven by: creativity (19%), dribbling (15%), press resistance (14%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via retention, carrying; Biumla more via passing directness.
Maximilian Rohr Elversberg · Bundesliga · 193 cm / 85 kg
71%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), press resistance (13%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central); Rohr more via creativity, receiving zones.
Igor Zubeldia Real Sociedad · 181 cm / 73 kg
68%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), press resistance (14%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Zubeldia more via creativity, passing directness.
Alexsandro Lille · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
68%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), press resistance (12%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Alexsandro more via passing directness, creativity.
Robin Le Normand Atletico · 187 cm / 80 kg
67%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), line-breaking (13%), through-balls (11%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Normand more via passing directness, creativity.
Gautier Lloris Brest · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 87 kg
65%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), line-breaking (15%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Ndukwe more via defensive aggression, transition; Lloris more via through-balls, passing directness.
20

Summary

Ifeanyi Ndukwe is a stopper centre-back: 89% pass completion, 16 line-breaking passes and 5.6 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 6 matches (450 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is ball-winning — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report