العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Florian Lejeune

Rayo Vallecano
Ball-playing centre-back CB
6.5 progressive passes/90 · 0.9 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending40%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.8281%
Ball-Winning76%vs 52 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.2775%
Ball recoveries /904.4283%
Tackles /901.7770%
Duels won /902.0777%
Breaking Pressure
only 136 pressured-passing actions across 3 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression44%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /903.442%
Line-breaking passes /900.6534%
Threat added by passing /901.11xT57%
Pass accuracy86.95%45%
Ball-Carrying61%vs 52 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /905.8662%
Carry distance /90128.09m60%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
867
minutes
9 apps
540
passes
86% completed
86%
pass completion
540 passes
63
progressive passes
6.5/90
71
line-breaking passes
7.4/90
185
defensive actions
19.2/90
32
tackles + interceptions
37% tackle win
50
clearances
5.2/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (48% of his 540 passes)
86% completion · 540× in 9/9 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
6 carries · 12× in 3/9 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
6.5 prog/90 · 71× in 9/9 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 25× in 8/9 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
4.2/90 · 40× in 9/9 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
60
passes / match
19.2
def actions / 90
41–92
pass range (matches)
50
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (41 at the low end, 92 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

09

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

145 tracked carries (15.1/90, 45 progressive, 1334m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

9%22%15%3%1%2%15%15%7%1%1%2%6%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 145 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 41m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
107Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
12Inside → Outside
First (59)Second (49)Third (23)Fourth (14)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

19
tackle duels
7
won
12
beaten · 63%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 63%
OUTSIDE 37%
Tackle-duel location — 12 inside · 7 outside
Right Wing
6 · 32%
Right Half-Space
5 · 26%
Central
4 · 21%
Left Half-Space
3 · 16%
Left Wing
1 · 5%
Vision AI beaten in 12 of 19 tackle duels (63% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 6 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

17%
vertical passes
59×
6%
switches
22×
36%
carries
127×
42%
short circulation
148×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW6531%2043%2826%17RHS21130%6416%3340%8512%252%4C13314%1923%3031%4124%328%11LHS459%431%1413%647%21LW1233%417%250%6FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 4 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.023 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 38% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 22% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

10% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 9 line-breaking passes and 40 final-third entries, 7.5 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
6%21%15%10%2%2%15%12%6%2%1%3%3%2%0%
completedincomplete540 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
540
passes
86%
completed
74
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 86% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

63
progressive · 6.5/90
40
final-third entries · 4.2/90
1
box entries · 0.10/90
21
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.21/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

78 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

4
attacking third (cheap)
22
middle third
52
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 5% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.76 danger-index/90 · 0.588 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

540
passes attempted
52%
mostly forward
57%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
282 · 52%
Sideways
182 · 34%
Backward
76 · 14%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
163 · 35%
Medium
266 · 57%
Long (>30m)
37 · 8%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.550.530.410.370.290.29
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.55
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
12 passes
0.53
Central Def third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.41
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
4 passes
0.37
Central Def third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.29
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
0.29
Right Half-Space Def third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
07

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Florian Lejeune gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
20%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
14%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
08

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Florian Lejeune actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
719171231382633417634111805313
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

6%21%15%10%2%2%15%12%6%2%1%3%3%2%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
3Cross
63Progressive
71Long ball
25Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
51Outside → Inside
270Inside → Inside
26Outside → Outside
119Inside → Outside
By direction
282Forward
76Backward
182Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing in the middle third — 12 passes worth 0.55 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 35% of his 51 touches there are lost (18 times).
35%18/51 lost13%14/109 lost19%14/75 lost5%1/19 lost—7 touches · too few18%7/38 lost8%9/118 lost5%3/66 lost7%2/28 lost—7 touches · too few—3 touches · too few12%1/8 lost10%1/10 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

185 defensive actions across the season (19.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
19
tackles · 37% won
13
interceptions · 1.3/90
44
recoveries · 4.6/90
50
clearances · 5.2/90
1
blocks
27
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
40
middle third
131
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 76 proactive ball-wins (7.9/90), tackle success 37%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Florian Lejeune still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.2, 3m)
81%
5.2
8.3
0.72
Mid press (PPDA 5.3, 3m)
84%
4.7
7.8
0.78
Low press (PPDA 6.6, 3m)
91%
9.8
6.0
1.62
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Florian Lejeune played nearly every Rayo Vallecano match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Rayo Vallecano produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Florian Lejeune specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
27%
279 / 1021
interceptions
18%
61 / 342
tackles
12%
85 / 685
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back74%Ball-playing centre-back61%
Why Stopper centre-back 74%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 80 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 56 (weight 35%) + retention 52 (weight 15%) + transition 72 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
ball-winning, box threat, transition
Average
build-up, carrying, passing directness, dribbling, receiving zones, defensive aggression, progression, press resistance, final-third threat, retention, creativity, line-breaking
Weak
through-balls, crossing, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Ball-winning
80
Box threat
75
Transition ~proxy
72
Build-up
67
Carrying
65
Passing directness
60
Dribbling
59
Receiving zones
57
Defensive aggression
56
Progression
55
Press resistance ~proxy
55
Final-third threat
52
Retention
52
Creativity
48
Line-breaking
42
Through-balls ~proxy
36
Crossing
34
Territory (wide vs central)
22
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 89 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mohammed Salisu Monaco · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
82%
Driven by: transition (23%), ball-winning (21%), territory (wide vs central) (9%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via through-balls, box threat; Salisu more via passing directness, carrying.
Loïc Badé Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 89 kg
81%
Driven by: transition (21%), ball-winning (15%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via through-balls; Badé more via passing directness, retention.
Tjark Scheller Paderborn · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 85 kg
77%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (16%), ball-winning (15%), transition (15%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via through-balls; Scheller more via creativity.
Leonardo Balerdi Roma · Serie A · 187 cm / 85 kg
76%
Driven by: ball-winning (23%), transition (17%), box threat (13%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via line-breaking; Balerdi more via crossing, through-balls.
Luka Vuskovic Brighton · Premier League · 193 cm / 86 kg
74%
Driven by: box threat (22%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via ball-winning, passing directness.
Jeff Chabot Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 195 cm / 95 kg
73%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), transition (19%), weight (10%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via ball-winning, dribbling; Chabot more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
20

Summary

Florian Lejeune is a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back: 86% pass completion, 71 line-breaking passes and 6.5 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 9 matches (867 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report