العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Marc Bartra

Real Betis
Stopper centre-back CB
19.0 defensive actions/90 · 3.1 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
383
minutes
6 apps
178
passes
85% completed
85%
pass completion
178 passes
13
progressive passes
3.1/90
29
line-breaking passes
6.8/90
81
defensive actions
19.0/90
16
tackles + interceptions
82% tackle win
31
clearances
7.3/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Marc Bartra has played 6 matches (383 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (56% of his 178 passes)
85% completion · 178× in 6/6 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 2/6 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.1 prog/90 · 29× in 6/6 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 8× in 5/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.5/90 · 15× in 4/6 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
15

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
30
passes / match
19.0
def actions / 90
13–63
pass range (matches)
31
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (13 at the low end, 63 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

29 tracked carries (6.8/90, 5 progressive, 219m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

7%24%10%28%3%14%3%10%
progressivelateral/short% of his 29 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 25m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
21Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (17)Second (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

11
tackle duels
9
won
2
beaten · 18%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 45%
OUTSIDE 55%
Tackle-duel location — 5 inside · 6 outside
Right Wing
6 · 55%
Right Half-Space
2 · 18%
Central
3 · 27%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 11 tackle duels (18% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

9%
vertical passes
9×
6%
switches
6×
17%
carries
18×
68%
short circulation
70×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball; he almost never carries (18×), so pressing his passing lanes beats pressing him.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW2770%1915%415%4RHS9837%3611%1136%3513%133%3C2417%48%238%925%612%3LHS3100%3LW0FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the defensive third → the right wing in the middle third — 2 progressive passes (29% of his progression) at 0.071 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 29% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 14% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

9% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 15 final-third entries, 1.9 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
11%14%21%20%4%1%1%11%8%6%1%1%1%1%
completedincomplete178 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
178
passes
85%
completed
26
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 85% season completion rate.
10

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.47/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

26 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

3
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
12
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 12% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.21 danger-index/90 · 0.525 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

What is his passing profile?

178
passes attempted
48%
mostly forward
47%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
85 · 48%
Sideways
66 · 37%
Backward
27 · 15%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
67 · 44%
Medium
72 · 47%
Long (>30m)
13 · 9%
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Marc Bartra gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
38%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
21%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
9%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Marc Bartra actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
112201610342025383681
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

11%14%21%20%4%1%1%11%8%6%1%1%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
09

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
1Cutback
13Progressive
29Long ball
8Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
8Outside → Inside
79Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
46Inside → Outside
By direction
85Forward
27Backward
66Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.52 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 25% of his 16 touches there are lost (4 times).
25%4/16 lost14%5/37 lost21%3/14 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few25%4/16 lost7%5/68 lost7%1/14 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

11

How & where does he defend?

81 defensive actions across the season (19.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 82% won
5
interceptions · 1.2/90
11
recoveries · 2.6/90
31
clearances · 7.3/90
4
blocks
25
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
20
middle third
57
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 27 proactive ball-wins (6.3/90), tackle success 82%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
12

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Marc Bartra still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.9, 2m)
81%
2.4
5.3
0.44
Mid press (PPDA 5.8, 2m)
83%
3.8
8.0
0.77
Low press (PPDA 6.5, 2m)
97%
2.4
7.1
1.09
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

13

Impact on the Team

Real Betis's output per match with Marc Bartra (6 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
1.17
1.75
-0.58
points /match
1.83
2.25
-0.42
goals for /match
1.17
2.25
-1.08
xG for /match
1.51
1.49
+0.02
14

His Share of the Team

Of everything Real Betis produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Marc Bartra specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
15%
192 / 1288
interceptions
8%
32 / 425
tackles
7%
56 / 784
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

16

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back66%Ball-playing centre-back48%
Why Stopper centre-back 66%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 72 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 54 (weight 35%) + retention 51 (weight 15%) + transition 59 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
dribbling, ball-winning
Average
carrying, press resistance, box threat, transition, defensive aggression, passing directness, final-third threat, retention, through-balls, build-up, territory (wide vs central), progression
Weak
receiving zones, creativity, line-breaking, crossing
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
74
Ball-winning
72
Carrying
65
Press resistance ~proxy
63
Box threat
62
Transition ~proxy
59
Defensive aggression
54
Passing directness
53
Final-third threat
52
Retention
51
Through-balls ~proxy
49
Build-up
45
Territory (wide vs central)
43
Progression
41
Receiving zones
37
Creativity
34
Line-breaking
33
Crossing
29
17

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mohammed Salisu Monaco · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
64%
Driven by: ball-winning (20%), dribbling (14%), crossing (13%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central); Salisu more via passing directness, transition.
Raphaël Le Guen Brest · Ligue 1 · 196 cm / 83 kg
62%
Driven by: crossing (21%), ball-winning (13%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via receiving zones, final-third threat; Guen more via box threat.
Alexsandro Ribeiro Lille · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
57%
Driven by: creativity (20%), crossing (14%), ball-winning (11%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via through-balls, final-third threat; Ribeiro more via build-up, retention.
Lloyd Kelly Juventus · Serie A · 189 cm / 70 kg
55%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), carrying (19%), press resistance (18%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via ball-winning; Kelly more via carrying, progression.
Eric Bailly Real Oviedo 25/26 · 187 cm / 77 kg
55%
Driven by: creativity (21%), crossing (19%), dribbling (16%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via final-third threat, through-balls.
Matías Moreno Venezia · Serie A · 193 cm / 81 kg
54%
Driven by: carrying (22%), creativity (17%), crossing (15%). Different mechanism — Bartra more via ball-winning, through-balls.
18

Summary

Marc Bartra is a stopper centre-back: 85% pass completion, 29 line-breaking passes and 3.1 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 6 matches (383 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report