العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Ante Budimir

Osasuna
Penalty-box poacher ST
3.0 shots/90 · 0.25 xG per shot — shoots from high-value spots · 0.74 xG/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing42%vs 23 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected0.95goals35%
Placement quality vs xG-2.08index0%
Shots on target73.091%
Box Threat78%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.55xG87%
Shots /903.0278%
xGOT /900.5xGOT70%
Goals vs xG (in line with xG): 7 goals from 5.9 xG (+1.1)
Ball-Carrying8%vs 23 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /900.8313%
Carry distance /9020.3m0%
Successful take-ons /900.249%
Take-on success29.41%9%
Aerial Threat0%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikertransition runnerbox threatfinishing
722
minutes
9 apps
7
goals
5.94 xG
5.9
xG
24 shots
24
shots
0.25 xG/shot
1
box entries
0.12/90
2
key passes
0.25/90
15
dribbles
47% won
59%
pass completion
91 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
2 key passes · 59% completion · 91× in 9/9 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
5.94 xG · 24× in 8/9 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
7 goals (+1.1 vs xG) · 7× in 8/9 matches
Signature: Link → Finish → Convert — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

19 tracked carries (2.4/90, 6 progressive, 214m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%5%11%16%26%26%11%
progressivelateral/short% of his 19 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 36m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
15Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (19)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 1.87 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 87%
OUTSIDE 13%
Dribble location — 13 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
8 · 53%
Central
4 · 27%
Left Half-Space
1 · 7%
Left Wing
2 · 13%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
04

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.25/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (1)from the right (1)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

24 shots · 5.94 xG · 7 goals (+1.06 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  24
on target  17
goals  7
xG  5.94
xG on target  6.65
xG / shot  0.248
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

45 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

22
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 49% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.24 danger-index/90 · 0.221 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ante Budimir actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
4512109141010122461184
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

5%8%8%3%1%4%10%11%11%1%4%5%13%9%5%
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 50% of his 12 touches there are lost (6 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few38%5/13 lost36%5/14 lost33%4/12 lost—6 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few36%4/11 lost50%6/12 lost—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

122 defensive actions across the season (15.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
10
tackles · 70% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
14
recoveries · 1.7/90
9
clearances · 1.1/90
3
blocks
58
avg action height
55
won high (att 3rd)
40
middle third
27
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 24 proactive ball-wins (3.0/90), tackle success 70%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

79
attacking-half actions · 9.85/90
08

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Ante Budimir keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.7, 3m)
0.13
0.3
0.34
50%
Mid press (PPDA 4.6, 3m)
0.18
0.0
0.40
50%
Low press (PPDA 5.7, 3m)
0.09
0.4
0.00
40%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

10

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Ante Budimir played nearly every Osasuna match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

11

His Share of the Team

Of everything Osasuna produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ante Budimir specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
70%
7 / 10
expected goals (xG)
39%
23.1 / 59.9
shots
25%
127 / 499
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

12

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Transition runner57%Poacher52%Target man48%Pressing forward46%
Why Transition runner 57%: a weighted blend of box threat 77 (weight 25%) + transition 41 (weight 45%) + defensive aggression 60 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness
Strong
box threat
Average
defensive aggression, transition
Weak
crossing, ball-winning, build-up, through-balls, final-third threat, creativity, dribbling, progression, press resistance, line-breaking, carrying, receiving zones, retention, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
97
Box threat
77
Defensive aggression
60
Transition ~proxy
41
Crossing
36
Ball-winning
34
Build-up
33
Through-balls ~proxy
25
Final-third threat
23
Creativity
23
Dribbling
20
Progression
17
Press resistance ~proxy
17
Line-breaking
16
Carrying
15
Receiving zones
14
Retention
11
Territory (wide vs central)
10
13

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Wilson Isidor Sunderland · Premier League · 184 cm / 72 kg
91%
Driven by: retention (12%), press resistance (12%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via build-up; Isidor more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
Rodrigo Muniz Fulham · Premier League · 185 cm / 79 kg
89%
Driven by: passing directness (10%), receiving zones (10%), retention (9%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via box threat; Muniz more via through-balls.
Mostafa Mohamed Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 185 cm / 88 kg
80%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), retention (15%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via box threat, passing directness; Mohamed more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Dusan Vlahovic Juventus · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 88 kg
80%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via passing directness; Vlahovic more via receiving zones, creativity.
Antonio Raimondo Frosinone · Serie A · 185 cm / 73 kg
77%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), retention (11%), dribbling (10%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via build-up; Raimondo more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Caleb Ekuban Genoa · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
77%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), retention (15%), press resistance (12%). Different mechanism — Budimir more via passing directness, box threat; Ekuban more via ball-winning, progression.
14

Summary

Ante Budimir is a transition runner: 7 goals from 5.94 xG (+1.06 vs expected), 24 shots, 1 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 9 matches (722 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report