Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-12

Lazio v AC Milan

LazioHome
2–2
AC MilanAway
1.621.47expected goals
2.182.16xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.62 – 1.47 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Lazio
AC Milan
Possession (share of passes)
34.1%65.9%
Duels
3221
Duels won
31.2%61.9%
Aerial duels
1010
Aerial duels won
46
Successful dribbles
38
Passes
348674
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lazio above the line, AC Milan below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.841.672.51Samuel Chukwueze — save, 0.03 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.09 xGTijjani Noslin — save, 0.13 xGMatteo Cancellieri — goal, 0.27 xGSamuel Chukwueze — miss, 0.05 xGPervis Estupiñán — save, 0.02 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.31 xGDavide Frattesi — miss, 0.07 xGDavide Frattesi — miss, 0.08 xGStrahinja Pavlovic — miss, 0.06 xGTijjani Noslin — goal, 0.65 xGRuben Loftus-Cheek — save, 0.04 xGGonçalo Ramos — miss, 0.05 xGMario Gila — save, 0.60 xGDiego Moreira — save, 0.05 xGSamuel Chukwueze — save, 0.09 xGStrahinja Pavlovic — save, 0.10 xGChristian Pulisic — save, 0.10 xGDiego Moreira — goal, 0.06 xGDiego Moreira — goal, 0.07 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.03 xGAlphadjo Cisse — miss, 0.07 xGDiego Moreira — miss, 0.06 xGOmari Hutchinson — save, 0.02 xG1.621.47Samuel Chukwueze — save, 0.37 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.25 xGOTTijjani Noslin — save, 0.04 xGOTMatteo Cancellieri — goal, 0.57 xGOTPervis Estupiñán — save, 0.02 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.27 xGOTTijjani Noslin — goal, 0.97 xGOTRuben Loftus-Cheek — save, 0.07 xGOTMario Gila — save, 0.75 xGOTDiego Moreira — save, 0.08 xGOTSamuel Chukwueze — save, 0.08 xGOTStrahinja Pavlovic — save, 0.04 xGOTChristian Pulisic — save, 0.30 xGOTDiego Moreira — goal, 0.06 xGOTDiego Moreira — goal, 0.35 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.08 xGOTOmari Hutchinson — save, 0.04 xGOT2.182.160'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LazioAC Milansolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Lazio
AC Milan

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Lazio or AC Milan got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 4 of 4 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Lazio

The question
When Lazio has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lazio's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 34.1% of the time on the ball34%Progression: 41.5% of the time on the ball41%Chance creation: 17.8% of the time on the ball18%Attacking transition: 6.6% of the time on the ball7%41%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up34.1%
Progression41.5%
Chance creation17.8%
Attacking transition6.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lazio spends most of its time on the ball (41% of its time on the ball).

AC Milan

The question
When AC Milan has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of AC Milan's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 27.6% of the time on the ball28%Progression: 57.0% of the time on the ball57%Chance creation: 14.3% of the time on the ball14%Attacking transition: 1.1% of the time on the ball57%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up27.6%
Progression57.0%
Chance creation14.3%
Attacking transition1.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where AC Milan spends most of its time on the ball (57% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Lazio
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
AC Milan
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Lazio — 478 touches
AC Milan — 808 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Lazio

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lazio actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
348
ACTIONS
5%5%14%5%11%7%9%8%8%12%2%2%1%3%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
69
ACTIONS
4%10%12%4%9%7%10%10%3%10%3%3%1%1%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.7% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 40% defensive, 43% middle, 17% attacking.

AC Milan

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does AC Milan actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
674
ACTIONS
4%4%11%5%4%11%11%15%11%8%3%2%2%2%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
174
ACTIONS
3%5%13%9%3%7%8%20%9%6%7%2%1%2%3%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (15.9% of all actions). 65% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 35% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 55% middle, 15% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Lazio
47%Left side20%Middle33%Right sideATTACKING →
L
47%20%33%
R
AC Milan
32%Left side36%Middle32%Right sideATTACKING →
L
32%36%32%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Lazio — 27 entries, 44% through the left wing
Left wing: 12 entries (44%)1244%LEFT WING00%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (15%)415%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (26%)726%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 4 entries (15%)415%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
AC Milan — 39 entries, 28% through the left wing
Left wing: 11 entries (28%)1128%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (15%)615%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (10%)410%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (23%)923%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (23%)923%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Lazio

The football question
How does Lazio progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

140build-up passes attempted
83%completed
31%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

43CB · 37%
6Long Wide · 5%
56Wide → FB · 48%
11Central · 9%

Sequence success — build-up

20build-up sequences in this match
15%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
50%turned over with nothing to show
CB43 · 37%
left: 25 passes, most from Provstgaard25right: 18 passes, most from Sutalo18
Long Wide6 · 5%
left: 4 passes, most from Mandas4right: 2 passes, most from Tavares2
Wide → FB56 · 48%
left: 35 passes, most from Mandas35right: 21 passes, most from Mandas21
Central11 · 9%
right: 7 passes, most from Mandas7left: 4 passes, most from Tavares4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lazio build predominantly down the right, with Mandas as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 33% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LW def → LW mid (13×).

AC Milan

The football question
How does AC Milan progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

197build-up passes attempted
91%completed
21%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

105CB · 59%
5Long Wide · 3%
2Long Central · 1%
46Wide → FB · 26%
21Central · 12%

Sequence success — build-up

19build-up sequences in this match
21%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
32%turned over with nothing to show
CB105 · 59%
right: 61 passes, most from Winter61left: 44 passes, most from Pavlovic44
Long Wide5 · 3%
left: 5 passes, most from Maignan5
Long Central2 · 1%
Wide → FB46 · 26%
left: 33 passes, most from Maignan33right: 13 passes, most from Maignan13
Central21 · 12%
left: 13 passes, most from Maignan13right: 8 passes, most from Maignan8
◆ Vision AI Insight
AC Milan build predominantly down the left, with Winter as the fulcrum (42 build-up passes). Only 21% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (17×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Lazio

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 33 progressive passes across 1 match (33.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
15%
Right half-space
12%
Central
9%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
45%
Progression is left-dominant: 27% right side · 9% central · 64% left.

Who generates it

Nuno Tavares
10 · 30%
Oliver Provstgaard
4 · 12%
Davide Frattesi
4 · 12%
Mattia Zaccagni
4 · 12%
Christos Mandas
3 · 9%
Top two — Nuno Tavares & Oliver Provstgaard — account for 42% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
33.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 42% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

AC Milan

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 48 progressive passes across 1 match (48.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
17%
Central
10%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
31%
Progression is right-dominant: 48% right side · 10% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Samuel Chukwueze
14 · 29%
Mario Gila
6 · 12%
Luka Modric
5 · 10%
Christian Pulisic
5 · 10%
Diego Moreira
4 · 8%
Top two — Samuel Chukwueze & Mario Gila — account for 42% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
48.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
19% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 19% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 42% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Lazio

The question
Where do Lazio's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

8shots
1.6xG
0.20xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Settled attack: 8 shots (100%)100%88SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 100% of shots821.620.20
Cross200.210.10
Pass into the box / short pass410.690.17
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.720.36

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Davide Frattesi10.310
Mattia Zaccagni10.271
Romano Floriani Mussolini10.130
Kenneth Taylor10.090
Nuno Tavares10.080

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Tijjani Noslin20.781
Mattia Zaccagni30.420
Matteo Cancellieri10.271
Davide Frattesi20.150
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lazio's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.6 of 1.6 xG, 8 of 8 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 0 of the 8 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 0 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.6 xG (+0.4).

AC Milan

The question
Where do AC Milan's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

16shots
1.5xG
0.09xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (19%)19%3Settled attack: 9 shots (56%)56%9Set piece: 4 shots (25%)25%416SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 19% of shots300.200.07
Cross100.060.06
Pass into the box / short pass200.140.07
Settled attack 56% of shots920.570.06
Cross100.100.10
Long ball100.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass720.430.06
Set piece 25% of shots400.700.17
Corner400.700.17

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Christian Pulisic40.231
Samuel Chukwueze20.160
Adrien Rabiot20.141
Alphadjo Cisse10.100
Mario Gila20.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Mario Gila10.600
Diego Moreira40.242
Samuel Chukwueze30.170
Strahinja Pavlovic20.160
Christian Pulisic10.100
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of AC Milan's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.7 of 1.5 xG, 4 of 16 shots), mostly corner. 3 of the 16 shots (19%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.5 xG (+0.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Lazio

The question
How does Lazio deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

13 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (23%), 2 led to a shot (15%). 1 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (100%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

AC Milan

The question
How does AC Milan deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 2 found a team-mate (12%), 2 led to a shot (12%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Lazio

The question
Which part of the final third does Lazio actually cross from?

13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (15%)15%2advanced right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 5 crosses (38%)38%5byline right wing: 2 crosses (15%)15%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing538%0
byline · left wing323%1
deep · left wing215%0
byline · right wing215%0
advanced · right wing18%1

AC Milan

The question
Which part of the final third does AC Milan actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right wing: 6 crosses (35%)35%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2byline right wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (24%)24%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing635%2
byline · left wing424%0
byline · right wing318%0
advanced · left wing212%0
deep · right wing16%0
deep · left wing16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.49Lazio on-ball value
+1.22AC Milan on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.5HALF TIME+1.49+1.220′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LazioAC MilanEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lazio — where the value came from
Passes348 actions+0.81
Carries69 actions+0.09
Dribbles8 actions-0.05
Shots8 actions+0.30
Ball wins52 actions+0.35
AC Milan — where the value came from
Passes674 actions+0.34
Carries174 actions+0.18
Dribbles16 actions+0.01
Shots16 actions+0.46
Ball wins56 actions+0.23
Lazio — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Mattia Zaccagni53+0.493
Tijjani Noslin16+0.333
Nuno Tavares65+0.259
Davide Frattesi39+0.229
Reda Belahyane39+0.182
Matteo Cancellieri (lowest)12-0.167
AC Milan — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Mario Gila100+0.330
Christian Pulisic35+0.281
Samuel Chukwueze119+0.222
Diego Moreira42+0.154
Strahinja Pavlovic130+0.099
Yunus Musah (lowest)49-0.075
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Lazio

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

2 of 17 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%2/17Frattesi6 of 18 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%6/18Mandas7 of 49 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/49Mandas3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Mandas6 of 39 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/39Tavares4 of 25 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%4/25Mussolini2 of 30 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/30Frattesi2 of 27 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/27Taylor5 of 27 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/27Noslin13 of 41 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%13/41Zaccagni8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 30 pass attempts lost here (43%).43%13/30Tavaresattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
15
Failed take-on
5
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 43% of 30 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 30% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

AC Milan

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 26 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%6/26Gila3 of 29 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%3/29Modric7 of 77 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%7/77Maignan1 of 35 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/35Modric1 of 30 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/30Pavlovic9 of 72 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%9/72Chukwueze5 of 74 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/74Gila5 of 100 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%5/100Modric6 of 76 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/76Rabiot6 of 55 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/55Rabiot8 of 23 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%8/23Chukwueze14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 16 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%4/16Cisse11 of 35 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%11/35Modricattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
29
Failed forward pass
21
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
18
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 35% of 23 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 37% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Lazio

Not just press intensity, but where the 138 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
9%
Middle third
46%
Own third
45%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 9.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 46% in midfield.

Where they win it back

125281168101216174DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

AC Milan

Not just press intensity, but where the 118 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
47%
Own third
41%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.6 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 47% in midfield.

Where they win it back

109169418131455535DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Lazio

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lazio win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 25 opposition possessions that Lazio ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
8.1passes
median 6 · before Lazio win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
25sec
median 17s · 25.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
20%
16%
40%
24%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.0
27s
15–30′
8.0
25s
30–45+′
8.0
22s
45–60′

too few
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
2.6
7s
average passesaverage seconds

AC Milan

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before AC Milan win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that AC Milan ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.6passes
median 3 · before AC Milan win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
9sec
median 6s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
39%
45%
13%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.9
9s
15–30′
4.2
8s
30–45+′
4.0
13s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
5.5
12s
75–90+′
3.1
9s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Lazio — 138 actions, 101 won
AC Milan — 118 actions, 96 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Lazio — 77 wins · 8% in the final third, 31% midfield, 61% own third
own third, right: 10 of 77 wins (13%)13%10 winsown third, centre: 26 of 77 wins (34%)34%26 winsown third, left: 11 of 77 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 77 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 77 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 77 wins (16%)16%12 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 77 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 77 wins (0%)final third, left: 3 of 77 wins (4%)4%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Mattia Zaccagniball-recovery5′87
Oliver Provstgaardinterception5′76
Kenneth Taylorinterception20′69
Kenneth Taylorball-recovery0′69
Romano Floriani Mussoliniball-recovery27′69
AC Milan — 71 wins · 7% in the final third, 32% midfield, 61% own third
own third, right: 12 of 71 wins (17%)17%12 winsown third, centre: 20 of 71 wins (28%)28%20 winsown third, left: 11 of 71 wins (15%)15%11 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 71 wins (17%)17%12 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 71 wins (13%)13%9 winsmidfield, left: 2 of 71 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 71 wins (6%)6%4 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 71 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 0 of 71 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Ruben Loftus-Cheekball-recovery18′89
Ruben Loftus-Cheekball-recovery13′83
Samuel Chukwuezeinterception79′79
Luka Modricinterception18′77
Mario Gilatackle70′69
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Lazio

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lazio? 48 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (1.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lazio)

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
23%
Central
13%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
23%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (25% of the danger conceded).

AC Milan

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against AC Milan? 33 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (1.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into AC Milan)

Right wing
12%
Right half-space
16%
Central
10%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
47%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (47% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Lazio

Build-up (own third)

safer, quicker, left-sided

right 20% · centre 43% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
167
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
16%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
51% of 57
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%
Progression (middle third)

quicker, safer, left-sided

right 33% · centre 27% · left 40%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
182
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
32% of 53
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%
Final third

safer, trying to break lines, left-sided

right 28% · centre 9% · left 63%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
76
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
25% of 28
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%

AC Milan

Build-up (own third)

safer, more recycling, playing short

right 23% · centre 49% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
257
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
65% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Progression (middle third)

safer, more recycling, circulating

right 32% · centre 39% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
474
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%
Final third

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 41% · centre 14% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
133
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 40
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Lazio
compared with their other 8 matches this season
PPDA9.0vs 5.2
Field tilt36%vs 59%
Progressive carries23vs 49
Passes348vs 549
Final-third entries27vs 49
AC Milan
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Defensive actions118vs 146
Field tilt64%vs 50%
Progressive carries66vs 55
Passes674vs 631
Threat from passing4.75vs 4.16

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Lazio

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
31%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

AC Milan

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
9%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
43%
11% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 89% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lazio: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot; AC Milan: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Lazio

2Corners
0Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%50%1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

AC Milan

5Corners
2Led to a shot
8Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.70Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
40%2 corners20%1 corner20%20%4 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lazio
AC Milan

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report