العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Moi Gómez

Osasuna
Central midfielder CM
balanced central profile
central midadvanced playmaker (8)progressionbox-to-box
410
minutes
6 apps
24
progressive passes
5.3/90
84%
pass completion
222 passes
6
key passes
1.32/90
6
box entries
1.32/90
22
final-3rd entries
4.8/90
8
dribbles
25% won
42
possessions lost
3.24 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Moi Gómez has played 6 matches (410 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (64% of his 222 passes)
84% completion · 222× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
5.3 prog/90 · 24× in 5/6 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
6 key passes · 6× in 4/6 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.32 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 6× in 3/6 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
20

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
37
passes / match
1.3
dribbles / match
10–73
pass range (matches)
1–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (10 at the low end, 73 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

63 tracked carries (13.8/90, 11 progressive, 662m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%10%5%10%16%3%3%21%14%14%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 63 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 45m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
37Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (24)Second (16)Third (12)Fourth (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Moi Gómez's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.76 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 62%
OUTSIDE 38%
Dribble location — 5 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
2 · 25%
Left Half-Space
3 · 38%
Left Wing
3 · 38%
Vision AI 38% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
11

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW729%257%414%1RHS1136%49%136%49%19%1C4910%514%751%2512%612%6LHS579%52%137%2116%937%21LW623%22%121%1347%2927%17FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → central areas in the final third — 4 progressive passes (16% of his progression) at 0.218 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 76% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 4% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

12% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 14 line-breaking passes and 22 final-third entries, 3.2 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%2%2%2%3%2%9%14%6%1%8%19%18%12%3%
completedincomplete222 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
222
passes
84%
completed
36
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

24
progressive · 5.3/90
22
final-third entries · 4.8/90
6
box entries · 1.32/90
22
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
03

How does he create chances?

6 key passes (1.32/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%17%50%
chance creation (6)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
12

Where does he become vulnerable?

42 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

10
attacking third (cheap)
24
middle third
8
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 24% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.24 danger-index/90 · 0.351 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

222
passes attempted
45%
mostly forward
45%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
99 · 45%
Sideways
69 · 31%
Backward
54 · 24%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
83 · 45%
Medium
81 · 44%
Long (>30m)
22 · 12%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.490.330.320.270.220.21
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.49
Central Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.33
Left Wing Att third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.32
Right Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.27
Central Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.22
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.21
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Moi Gómez gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
20%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
20%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
19%
Third
Left Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Moi Gómez actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
3204340276520331314447
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%2%2%2%3%2%9%14%6%1%8%19%18%12%3%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

6Key pass
4Cross
2Cutback
24Progressive
32Long ball
18Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
48Outside → Inside
75Inside → Inside
21Outside → Outside
42Inside → Outside
By direction
99Forward
54Backward
69Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the right hs in the final third — 2 passes worth 0.49 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 6 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the central in the final third — 4 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 36% of his 14 touches there are lost (5 times).
—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few36%5/14 lost—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few11%5/44 lost7%3/44 lost19%8/43 lost—2 touches · too few—7 touches · too few22%2/9 lost17%2/12 lost18%4/22 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
05

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 63 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (59%). He carries from outside into the middle 6 times and out toward the touchline 1 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
09

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
0 · 0%
Progressive / key pass
7 · 11%
Simple pass
48 · 76%
No clean link
8 · 13%
Of 63 carries, 0% flow straight into a shot of his own, 11% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 13% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
15

Crosses & Cutbacks

4 crosses (0.88/90, 3 completed) and 2 cutbacks (0.44/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

17

How & where does he defend?

69 defensive actions across the season (15.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 50% won
3
interceptions · 0.7/90
27
recoveries · 5.9/90
6
clearances · 1.3/90
5
blocks
38
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
31
middle third
32
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 36 proactive ball-wins (7.9/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
16

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Moi Gómez keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
0.94
3.6
0.59
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.8, 2m)
1.85
8.0
2.00
33%
Low press (PPDA 5.9, 2m)
1.50
4.4
1.46
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

18

Impact on the Team

Osasuna's output per match with Moi Gómez (6 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
1.50
0.33
+1.17
xG for /match
1.95
0.00
+1.95
goals against /match
1.83
2.33
-0.50
points /match
1.67
0.33
+1.33
19

His Share of the Team

Of everything Osasuna produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Moi Gómez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
12%
28 / 233
final-third entries
10%
181 / 1762
half-space entries
9%
83 / 939
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

21

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Advanced playmaker (8)82%Box-to-box runner79%Transition runner74%Deep-lying playmaker73%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 82%: a weighted blend of creativity 85 (weight 35%) + progression 92 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 88 (weight 25%) + box threat 22 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness, line-breaking, transition, progression, final-third threat
Strong
creativity, receiving zones, carrying, through-balls
Average
build-up, defensive aggression, ball-winning, retention, territory (wide vs central), crossing, press resistance, dribbling
Weak
box threat
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
97
Line-breaking
94
Transition ~proxy
93
Progression
92
Final-third threat
88
Creativity
85
Receiving zones
84
Carrying
83
Through-balls ~proxy
79
Build-up
68
Defensive aggression
64
Ball-winning
62
Retention
62
Territory (wide vs central)
49
Crossing
49
Press resistance ~proxy
48
Dribbling
43
Box threat
22
22

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 71 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Luka Modric AC Milan · Serie A · 172 cm / 66 kg
90%
Driven by: transition (19%), progression (11%), passing directness (10%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via territory (wide vs central); Modric more via crossing, build-up.
Sandro Tonali Tottenham · Premier League · 181 cm / 79 kg
88%
Driven by: transition (21%), passing directness (15%), creativity (13%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Tonali more via box threat.
Angelo Stiller Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 77 kg
86%
Driven by: transition (16%), creativity (11%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via territory (wide vs central); Stiller more via press resistance, crossing.
Declan Rice Arsenal · Premier League · 188 cm / 76 kg
85%
Driven by: transition (19%), progression (13%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via creativity, defensive aggression; Rice more via box threat.
Valentín Barco Chelsea · Premier League · 170 cm / 67 kg
81%
Driven by: transition (17%), progression (13%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via defensive aggression, passing directness; Barco more via box threat, dribbling.
Joshua Kimmich Bayern · Bundesliga · 177 cm / 75 kg
81%
Driven by: transition (16%), progression (13%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Gómez more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Kimmich more via box threat, retention.
23

Summary

Moi Gómez is an advanced playmaker (8) / box-to-box runner: 5.3 progressive passes, 1.32 key passes /90, 6 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 6 matches (410 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) / box-to-box runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report