العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Alessandro Deiola

Cagliari
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
13.0 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure
only 98 pressured-passing actions across 4 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression28%vs 45 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.2724%
Line-breaking passes /900.6651%
Threat added by passing /900.63xT11%
Pass accuracy83.8%24%
Ball-Winning30%vs 45 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.7411%
Ball recoveries /902.9231%
Tackles /902.0280%
Duels won /900.580%
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
691
minutes
9 apps
320
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
320 passes
33
progressive passes
4.3/90
100
defensive actions
13.0/90
18
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
21
recoveries
2.7/90
29
line-breaking passes
3.8/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the defensive third (60% of his 320 passes)
89% completion · 320× in 9/9 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
4.3 prog/90 · 29× in 8/9 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
5.1 ball-wins/90 · 39× in 9/9 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
2.1 f3-entries/90 · 16× in 6/9 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
36
passes / match
13.0
def actions / 90
6–75
pass range (matches)
29
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (6 at the low end, 75 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

75 tracked carries (9.8/90, 9 progressive, 542m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

15%20%4%5%5%31%9%3%4%3%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 75 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 22m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
59Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (34)Second (23)Third (9)Fourth (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

14
tackle duels
7
won
7
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 86%
OUTSIDE 14%
Tackle-duel location — 12 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
2 · 14%
Central
9 · 64%
Left Half-Space
1 · 7%
Left Wing
2 · 14%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 14 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

12%
vertical passes
28×
4%
switches
10×
28%
carries
68×
56%
short circulation
136×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW3429%1032%1132%116%2RHS10129%2921%2135%3514%142%2C10911%1226%2829%3226%288%9LHS215%15%129%624%538%8LW1921%432%647%9FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the middle third → the right half-space in the final third — 3 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.122 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 52% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 12% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

8% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 5 line-breaking passes and 16 final-third entries, 5.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
9%18%8%6%0%1%3%25%14%3%1%1%5%4%2%1%1%
completedincomplete320 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
320
passes
89%
completed
36
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

33
progressive · 4.3/90
16
final-third entries · 2.1/90
1
box entries · 0.13/90
14
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.52/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%25%25%25%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07

Where does he become vulnerable?

36 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

3
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
22
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 8% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.76 danger-index/90 · 0.589 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

320
passes attempted
48%
mostly forward
55%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
153 · 48%
Sideways
114 · 36%
Backward
53 · 17%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
108 · 38%
Medium
156 · 55%
Long (>30m)
20 · 7%
06

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.420.320.220.200.200.18
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.42
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.32
Right Wing Def third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.22
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Left Wing Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
0.18
Right Wing Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
3 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Alessandro Deiola gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
21%
Secondary
Central, Defensive third
14%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Alessandro Deiola actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
415128229804411612856241812
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

9%18%8%6%0%1%3%25%14%3%1%1%5%4%2%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
1Cross
2Cutback
33Progressive
29Long ball
10Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
34Outside → Inside
170Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
61Inside → Outside
By direction
153Forward
53Backward
114Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.42 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 33% of his 33 touches there are lost (11 times).
33%11/33 lost11%8/71 lost0%0/66 lost14%2/14 lost12%1/8 lost0%0/10 lost7%3/41 lost9%4/44 lost11%1/9 lost23%3/13 lost—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

100 defensive actions across the season (13.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
14
tackles · 50% won
4
interceptions · 0.5/90
21
recoveries · 2.7/90
29
clearances · 3.8/90
4
blocks
23
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
15
middle third
84
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 39 proactive ball-wins (5.1/90), tackle success 50%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Alessandro Deiola still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.7, 3m)
81%
3.3
2.1
0.71
Mid press (PPDA 4.6, 3m)
84%
4.2
6.6
0.99
Low press (PPDA 5.4, 3m)
93%
5.1
3.2
0.95
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Alessandro Deiola played nearly every Cagliari match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Cagliari produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Alessandro Deiola specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
7%
49 / 701
expected assists (xA)
7%
1.7 / 25.1
clearances
6%
67 / 1148
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller51%Deep-lying playmaker45%Ball-winning 622%
Why Tempo controller 51%: a weighted blend of build-up 68 (weight 30%) + retention 54 (weight 35%) + press resistance 41 (weight 20%) + progression 24 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
build-up, passing directness, box threat, retention, crossing, press resistance
Weak
creativity, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, transition, through-balls, dribbling, progression, defensive aggression, carrying, line-breaking, final-third threat, receiving zones
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
68
Passing directness
60
Box threat
55
Retention
54
Crossing
53
Press resistance ~proxy
41
Creativity
32
Territory (wide vs central)
32
Ball-winning
31
Transition ~proxy
30
Through-balls ~proxy
28
Dribbling
27
Progression
24
Defensive aggression
22
Carrying
22
Line-breaking
21
Final-third threat
14
Receiving zones
9
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 85 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Kwon Hyeok-Kyu Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 192 cm / 77 kg
86%
Driven by: receiving zones (11%), defensive aggression (11%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Deiola more via passing directness, box threat.
Ryan Yates Nottingham Forest · Premier League · 190 cm / 87 kg
79%
Driven by: receiving zones (13%), carrying (11%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Deiola more via build-up, through-balls; Yates more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Leander Dendoncker Real Oviedo · La Liga 25/26 · 188 cm / 83 kg
76%
Driven by: final-third threat (14%), transition (12%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Deiola more via passing directness; Dendoncker more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Eric Martel Mainz · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 81 kg
75%
Driven by: receiving zones (14%), final-third threat (12%), creativity (11%). Different mechanism — Martel more via defensive aggression, carrying.
Nicolai Remberg Hamburg · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 88 kg
75%
Driven by: receiving zones (14%), final-third threat (13%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Deiola more via passing directness, box threat; Remberg more via carrying, retention.
Lennard Maloney Mainz · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 89 kg
73%
Driven by: receiving zones (13%), final-third threat (12%), carrying (10%). Different mechanism — Deiola more via retention, press resistance; Maloney more via defensive aggression.
20

Summary

Alessandro Deiola is a tempo controller: 89% completion, 29 line-breaks and 4.3 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 0% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 9 matches (691 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report