Thin sample this season. Mikel Merino has played 8 matches (218 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (61% of his 109 passes)
83% completion · 109× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
4.1 prog/90 · 10× in 5/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.00 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 8× in 0/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
13
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
14
passes / match
1.8
dribbles / match
1–26
pass range (matches)
1–3
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (1 at the low end, 26 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
24 tracked carries (9.9/90, 7 progressive, 243m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 24 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (13)Second (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 7 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
02
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07
Where does he become vulnerable?
21 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
9
attacking third (cheap)
9
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 43% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.49 danger-index/90 · 0.287 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Mikel Merino gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
15%
Primary
Central, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
13%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mikel Merino actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
08
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the final third: 38% of his 8 touches there are lost (3 times).
45 defensive actions across the season (18.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
14
recoveries · 5.8/90
1
clearances · 0.4/90
2
blocks
50
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
21
middle third
13
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 14 proactive ball-wins (5.8/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
09
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Mikel Merino keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.6, 2m)
1.11
4.9
0.00
50%
Mid press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
0.32
0.0
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 7.5, 4m)
1.15
4.4
0.00
100%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Insufficient sample: Mikel Merino played nearly every Arsenal match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.
12
His Share of the Team
Of everything Arsenal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mikel Merino specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
6%
4.2 / 73.3
shots
5%
30 / 631
ball recoveries
4%
71 / 1727
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Transition runner 74%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 87 (weight 30%) + box threat 86 (weight 25%) + transition 47 (weight 45%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
87
Box threat
86
Passing directness
73
Dribbling
69
Press resistance ~proxy
59
Ball-winning
54
Through-balls ~proxy
52
Transition ~proxy
47
Retention
44
Receiving zones
37
Final-third threat
35
Line-breaking
33
Build-up
30
Territory (wide vs central)
27
Creativity
25
Crossing
22
Progression
19
Carrying
17
15
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 189 cm / 83 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Mauro Arambarri Getafe · La Liga 25/26 · 175 cm / 71 kg
77%
Driven by: crossing (17%), defensive aggression (14%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Merino more via through-balls, final-third threat; Arambarri more via passing directness.
Lassana Coulibaly Lecce · Serie A · 183 cm / 77 kg
73%
Driven by: progression (16%), creativity (14%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Merino more via through-balls, box threat; Coulibaly more via crossing.
Marshall Munetsi Wolves · Ligue 1 25/26 · 188 cm / 83 kg
73%
Driven by: crossing (14%), progression (12%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Merino more via through-balls, ball-winning; Munetsi more via passing directness.
Idrissa Touré Pisa · Serie A · 188 cm / 76 kg
69%
Driven by: defensive aggression (21%), build-up (13%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Merino more via retention, box threat; Touré more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
Morten Thorsby Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 72 kg
69%
Driven by: defensive aggression (18%), carrying (17%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Merino more via through-balls, ball-winning; Thorsby more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness.
Michael Folorunsho Monza · Serie A · 190 cm / 92 kg
68%
Driven by: crossing (15%), progression (11%), creativity (11%). Different mechanism — Merino more via ball-winning, defensive aggression; Folorunsho more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
16
Summary
Mikel Merino is a transition runner: 4.1 progressive passes, 0.00 key passes /90, 3 box entries, 0 goals from 0.70 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 8 matches (218 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.