العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Toni Martínez

Alaves
Complete forward ST
3.0 shots/90 with 0.51 key passes/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing38%vs 23 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected1.33goals39%
Placement quality vs xG-1.58index4%
Shots on target59.070%
Box Threat43%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.34xG35%
Shots /902.9765%
xGOT /900.3xGOT30%
Ball-Carrying25%vs 23 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /900.9113%
Carry distance /9034.19m30%
Successful take-ons /900.4626%
Take-on success32.08%30%
Aerial Threat0%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikerpressing forwardbox threatfinishing
533
minutes
9 apps
0
goals
2.20 xG
2.2
xG
18 shots
18
shots
0.12 xG/shot
0
box entries
0.00/90
3
key passes
0.51/90
7
dribbles
0% won
61%
pass completion
71 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
3 key passes · 61% completion · 71× in 9/9 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
2.20 xG · 18× in 7/9 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

12 tracked carries (2.0/90, 3 progressive, 149m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

8%8%8%25%17%8%17%8%
progressivelateral/short% of his 12 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 43m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
8Inside → Inside
1Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 7 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

04

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.51/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (2)from the right (1)of 3 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

18 shots · 2.20 xG · 0 goals (-2.20 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  18
on target  6
goals  0
xG  2.20
xG on target  1.26
xG / shot  0.122
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

35 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

14
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
0
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 40% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.37 danger-index/90 · 0.233 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 64% of his 11 touches there are lost (7 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few44%4/9 lost—6 touches · too few27%3/11 lost—4 touches · too few—7 touches · too few64%7/11 lost—5 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

08

How & where does he defend?

94 defensive actions across the season (15.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
5
tackles · 100% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
6
recoveries · 1.0/90
9
clearances · 1.5/90
1
blocks
55
avg action height
28
won high (att 3rd)
46
middle third
20
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 11 proactive ball-wins (1.9/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

64
attacking-half actions · 10.81/90
07

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Toni Martínez keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.1, 3m)
0.08
0.0
0.49
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.3, 3m)
0.21
1.1
1.11
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.5, 3m)
0.18
0.5
0.00
0%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

09

Impact on the Team

Alaves's output per match with Toni Martínez (9 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (9)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
5.00
-4.00
xG for /match
1.23
0.00
+1.23
goals against /match
1.00
2.00
-1.00
points /match
1.00
3.00
-2.00
10

His Share of the Team

Of everything Alaves produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Toni Martínez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
25%
12.7 / 50.1
shots
21%
111 / 540
zone-14 entries
9%
21 / 223
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

11

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward71%Transition runner68%Poacher47%False 942%
Why Pressing forward 71%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 77 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 51 (weight 30%) + transition 56 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness, territory (wide vs central)
Strong
defensive aggression
Average
box threat, transition, ball-winning, creativity, final-third threat, line-breaking, crossing, progression
Weak
through-balls, receiving zones, dribbling, build-up, carrying, press resistance, retention
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
92
Territory (wide vs central)
90
Defensive aggression
77
Box threat
57
Transition ~proxy
56
Ball-winning
51
Creativity
49
Final-third threat
45
Line-breaking
44
Crossing
42
Progression
42
Through-balls ~proxy
39
Receiving zones
38
Dribbling
36
Build-up
34
Carrying
32
Press resistance ~proxy
28
Retention
11
12

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 187 cm / 83 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Antonio Raimondo Frosinone · Serie A · 185 cm / 73 kg
81%
Driven by: retention (16%), defensive aggression (15%), press resistance (14%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via line-breaking, dribbling; Raimondo more via box threat.
Dominic Calvert-Lewin Leeds · Premier League · 187 cm / 71 kg
75%
Driven by: retention (23%), press resistance (17%), defensive aggression (11%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via ball-winning, dribbling; Calvert-Lewin more via line-breaking, through-balls.
Andrej Ilic Union Berlin · Bundesliga 25/26 · 189 cm / 86 kg
74%
Driven by: retention (20%), defensive aggression (15%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Adam Buksa Udinese · Serie A 25/26 · 191 cm / 78 kg
73%
Driven by: retention (20%), passing directness (15%), press resistance (15%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via territory (wide vs central), box threat.
Christantus Uche Crystal Palace 25/26 · 190 cm / 84 kg
71%
Driven by: retention (22%), territory (wide vs central) (15%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via box threat, through-balls; Uche more via carrying.
Mostafa Mohamed Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 185 cm / 88 kg
68%
Driven by: retention (26%), press resistance (17%), defensive aggression (10%). Different mechanism — Martínez more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones.
13

Summary

Toni Martínez is a pressing forward / transition runner: 0 goals from 2.20 xG (-2.20 vs expected), 18 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 9 matches (533 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is ball-winning — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report