العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Alexander Isak

Liverpool
Penalty-box poacher ST
3.1 shots/90 · 0.20 xG per shot — shoots from high-value spots · 0.62 xG/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing54%vs 18 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected2.82goals78%
Placement quality vs xG-0.15index67%
Shots on target21.017%
Box Threat72%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.42xG72%
Shots /902.5361%
xGOT /900.41xGOT83%
Goals vs xG (overperforming xG -- clinical, scoring more than the chances alone predict): 6 goals from 4.0 xG (+2.0)
Ball-Carrying15%vs 18 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /901.0317%
Carry distance /9027.34m11%
Successful take-ons /900.4122%
Take-on success26.09%11%
Aerial Threat0%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikertarget manbox threatfinishing
585
minutes
7 apps
6
goals
4.04 xG
4.0
xG
20 shots
20
shots
0.20 xG/shot
3
box entries
0.46/90
3
key passes
0.46/90
11
dribbles
45% won
75%
pass completion
80 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE / MOVE
occupy the box, drop or run channel — mostly in the attacking third (56% of his 80 passes)
0.46 box entries/90 · 3× in 2/7 matches
↓
LINK
lay-off and combine
3 key passes · 75% completion · 80× in 7/7 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
4.04 xG · 20× in 7/7 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
6 goals (+2.0 vs xG) · 6× in 7/7 matches
Signature: occupy / move → link → shoot → convert.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

19 tracked carries (2.9/90, 3 progressive, 156m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

11%5%5%11%16%5%21%5%5%16%
progressivelateral/short% of his 19 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 22m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
11Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (19)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 1.69 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 55%
OUTSIDE 45%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
2 · 18%
Right Half-Space
4 · 36%
Central
1 · 9%
Left Half-Space
1 · 9%
Left Wing
3 · 27%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
04

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.46/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (0)of 3 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

20 shots · 4.04 xG · 6 goals (+1.96 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  20
on target  13
goals  6
xG  4.04
xG on target  4.08
xG / shot  0.202
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

26 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

12
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 46% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.00 danger-index/90 · 0.249 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 40% of his 10 touches there are lost (4 times).
—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—6 touches · too few40%4/10 lost—7 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—6 touches · too few19%3/16 lost0%0/11 lost—6 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

08

How & where does he defend?

28 defensive actions across the season (4.3/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 0% won
1
interceptions · 0.2/90
5
recoveries · 0.8/90
1
clearances · 0.2/90
2
blocks
69
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
13
middle third
1
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 7 proactive ball-wins (1.1/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

25
attacking-half actions · 3.85/90
07

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Alexander Isak keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.6, 2m)
0.25
0.0
1.73
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.6, 2m)
0.06
0.5
0.00
20%
Low press (PPDA 7.2, 3m)
0.23
0.4
0.00
80%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

09

Impact on the Team

Liverpool's output per match with Alexander Isak (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
1.57
0.00
+1.57
xG for /match
1.53
0.00
+1.53
goals against /match
0.71
3.00
-2.29
points /match
2.14
0.00
+2.14
10

His Share of the Team

Of everything Liverpool produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Alexander Isak specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
60%
6 / 10
expected goals (xG)
9%
6.2 / 66.1
shots
5%
37 / 706
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

11

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Target man46%Poacher46%Transition runner39%Pressing forward31%
Why Target man 46%: a weighted blend of box threat 60 (weight 50%) + final-third threat 33 (weight 30%) + retention 37 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
passing directness, territory (wide vs central), box threat, receiving zones, defensive aggression
Weak
creativity, retention, final-third threat, press resistance, transition, dribbling, carrying, crossing, ball-winning, build-up, progression, through-balls, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
63
Territory (wide vs central)
63
Box threat
60
Receiving zones
58
Defensive aggression
52
Creativity
38
Retention
37
Final-third threat
33
Press resistance ~proxy
29
Transition ~proxy
29
Dribbling
23
Carrying
22
Crossing
22
Ball-winning
20
Build-up
20
Progression
17
Through-balls ~proxy
10
Line-breaking
4
12

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Luis Vázquez Getafe · La Liga 25/26 · 190 cm / 82 kg
79%
Driven by: build-up (13%), crossing (11%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Isak more via box threat, retention; Vázquez more via ball-winning, passing directness.
Thierno Barry Everton · 195 cm / 82 kg
78%
Driven by: line-breaking (15%), through-balls (14%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Isak more via passing directness; Barry more via defensive aggression, carrying.
Olivier Giroud Lille · Ligue 1 · 193 cm / 91 kg
76%
Driven by: line-breaking (16%), progression (15%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Isak more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Giroud more via press resistance, build-up.
Beto Fiorentina · 194 cm / 88 kg
75%
Driven by: line-breaking (13%), build-up (13%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Isak more via passing directness, final-third threat; Beto more via crossing, defensive aggression.
Andrej Ilic Union Berlin · Bundesliga 25/26 · 189 cm / 86 kg
75%
Driven by: build-up (18%), ball-winning (12%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Isak more via territory (wide vs central), retention; Ilic more via line-breaking, passing directness.
Ragnar Ache Koln · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 81 kg
75%
Driven by: build-up (21%), line-breaking (15%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Isak more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones; Ache more via dribbling, creativity.
13

Summary

Alexander Isak is a target man: 6 goals from 4.04 xG (+1.96 vs expected), 20 shots, 3 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 7 matches (585 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a target man — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall target man profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report