العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Pierre Lees-Melou

Paris FC
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
16.4 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure
only 91 pressured-passing actions across 2 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression31%vs 21 defensive mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.5719%
Line-breaking passes /901.1124%
Threat added by passing /900.93xT33%
Pass accuracy84.3%48%
Ball-Winning48%vs 21 defensive mids
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.0219%
Ball recoveries /905.3362%
Tackles /902.9286%
Duels won /900.4424%
defensive midball-winning 6press resistancescreening
748
minutes
8 apps
497
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
497 passes
31
progressive passes
3.7/90
136
defensive actions
16.4/90
36
tackles + interceptions
59% tackle win
41
recoveries
4.9/90
39
line-breaking passes
4.7/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (65% of his 497 passes)
89% completion · 497× in 8/8 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
60% won · 5× in 3/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
3.7 prog/90 · 39× in 8/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.3 ball-wins/90 · 77× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
5.1 f3-entries/90 · 42× in 8/8 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
62
passes / match
16.4
def actions / 90
41–91
pass range (matches)
12
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (41 at the low end, 91 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

75 tracked carries (9.0/90, 4 progressive, 478m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

1%15%21%23%4%3%12%15%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 75 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 16m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
64Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (23)Third (17)Fourth (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

27
tackle duels
16
won
11
beaten · 41%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 44%
OUTSIDE 56%
Tackle-duel location — 12 inside · 15 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
3 · 11%
Central
1 · 4%
Left Half-Space
8 · 30%
Left Wing
15 · 56%
Vision AI beaten in 11 of 27 tackle duels (41% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 5 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

8%
vertical passes
19×
4%
switches
10×
17%
carries
38×
71%
short circulation
162×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW475%325%1RHS3030%960%187%23%1C1758%1418%3248%8415%2710%18LHS1846%114%734%6323%4233%61LW512%14%216%820%1059%30FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 4 progressive passes (17% of his progression) at 0.088 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 48% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 22% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

10% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 10 line-breaking passes and 42 final-third entries, 1.5 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%2%1%2%1%0%1%11%15%20%4%0%2%7%12%15%6%1%
completedincomplete497 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
497
passes
89%
completed
53
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

31
progressive · 3.7/90
42
final-third entries · 5.1/90
2
box entries · 0.24/90
13
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.48/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
75%25%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

55 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

13
attacking third (cheap)
27
middle third
15
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 24% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.53 danger-index/90 · 0.383 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

497
passes attempted
41%
mostly forward
57%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
205 · 41%
Sideways
169 · 34%
Backward
123 · 25%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
252 · 57%
Medium
157 · 35%
Long (>30m)
35 · 8%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.630.190.190.180.170.13
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.63
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
6 passes
0.19
Central Def third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.19
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.17
Left Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.13
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pierre Lees-Melou gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
29%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
25%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
11%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pierre Lees-Melou actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
93462752866567510024221041132
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%2%1%2%1%0%1%11%15%20%4%0%2%7%12%15%6%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
1Cutback
31Progressive
39Long ball
32Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
21Outside → Inside
276Inside → Inside
34Outside → Outside
113Inside → Outside
By direction
205Forward
123Backward
169Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 6 passes worth 0.63 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the defensive third: 30% of his 10 touches there are lost (3 times).
—3 touches · too few30%3/10 lost4%2/51 lost15%5/34 lost19%3/16 lost—2 touches · too few13%3/23 lost10%13/124 lost6%9/142 lost3%1/32 lost—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few12%2/17 lost21%6/28 lost30%3/10 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

136 defensive actions across the season (16.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
27
tackles · 59% won
9
interceptions · 1.1/90
41
recoveries · 4.9/90
12
clearances · 1.4/90
11
blocks
36
avg action height
12
won high (att 3rd)
60
middle third
64
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 77 proactive ball-wins (9.3/90), tackle success 59%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Pierre Lees-Melou still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.4, 2m)
87%
3.2
2.3
0.62
Mid press (PPDA 5.7, 2m)
93%
4.2
5.1
1.20
Low press (PPDA 9.1, 4m)
88%
3.8
5.8
1.03
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Pierre Lees-Melou played nearly every Paris FC match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Paris FC produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pierre Lees-Melou specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
13%
92 / 695
zone-14 entries
13%
35 / 276
ball recoveries
10%
168 / 1725
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 260 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-winning 661%Tempo controller50%Deep-lying playmaker48%
Why Ball-winning 6 61%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 68 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 57 (weight 30%) + retention 49 (weight 15%) + progression 40 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
passing directness
Average
ball-winning, receiving zones, box threat, build-up, final-third threat, defensive aggression, transition, line-breaking, retention, creativity, through-balls, press resistance, crossing, progression
Weak
dribbling, carrying, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
82
Ball-winning
68
Receiving zones
67
Box threat
67
Build-up
62
Final-third threat
60
Defensive aggression
57
Transition ~proxy
55
Line-breaking
53
Retention
49
Creativity
49
Through-balls ~proxy
45
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Crossing
40
Progression
40
Dribbling
37
Carrying
28
Territory (wide vs central)
24
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 69 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Andrey Santos Man Utd · Premier League · 180 cm / 75 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), dribbling (15%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Lees-Melou more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central); Santos more via build-up, retention.
Aurélien Tchouaméni Real Madrid · La Liga · 187 cm / 81 kg
65%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), territory (wide vs central) (15%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Lees-Melou more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central); Tchouaméni more via progression, carrying.
Casemiro Man Utd · Premier League 25/26 · 185 cm / 84 kg
64%
Driven by: passing directness (22%), box threat (15%), territory (wide vs central) (10%). Different mechanism — Casemiro more via progression, line-breaking.
Chema Andres Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 82 kg
61%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (21%), ball-winning (15%), receiving zones (15%). Different mechanism — Lees-Melou more via territory (wide vs central); Andres more via retention, press resistance.
Guido Rodríguez Valencia · La Liga · 185 cm / 80 kg
61%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), ball-winning (19%), carrying (17%). Different mechanism — Lees-Melou more via through-balls, final-third threat; Rodríguez more via dribbling.
Pape Diop Strasbourg · 182 cm
59%
Driven by: ball-winning (25%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), receiving zones (15%). Different mechanism — Lees-Melou more via passing directness; Diop more via receiving zones, line-breaking.
20

Summary

Pierre Lees-Melou is a ball-winning 6: 89% completion, 39 line-breaks and 3.7 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 60% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 8 matches (748 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report