His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 66 passes)
89% completion · 66× in 2/2 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
4.5/90 · 5× in 2/2 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); break a line — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); switch play — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
1 key passes (0.90/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 9% of his 11 touches there are lost (1 times).
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Lorient's output per match with Alec Georgen (2 matches) versus without him (6 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 6 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (2)
WITHOUT (6)
Δ
goals against /match
0.00
1.00
-1.00
points /match
2.00
1.33
+0.67
goals for /match
0.50
1.00
-0.50
xG for /match
0.86
0.99
-0.13
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lorient produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Alec Georgen specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
1%
3 / 251
zone-14 entries
1%
1 / 133
half-space entries
1%
4 / 537
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Alec Georgen is a centre-back: 89% pass completion, 1 line-breaking passes and 3.6 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 2 matches (100 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
