Thin sample this season. Ryan Sessegnon has played 5 matches (180 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the attacking third (41% of his 109 passes)
79% completion · 109× in 5/5 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
11 carries · 22× in 5/5 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.0 prog/90 · 20× in 5/5 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 4× in 2/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.5/90 · 3× in 2/5 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
13
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
22
passes / match
14.5
def actions / 90
3–50
pass range (matches)
6
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 50 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
19 tracked carries (9.5/90, 4 progressive, 180m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 19 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 36m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (19)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
1
tackle duels
0
won
1
beaten · 100%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 0%
OUTSIDE 100%
Tackle-duel location — 0 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
1 · 100%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 1 tackle duels (100% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
For a centre-back the carry is a build-up weapon — does he step out through the middle, or keep it simple? Every carry classified by channel. Season rate: 5.50 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 55%
OUTSIDE 45%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
2 · 18%
Right Half-Space
2 · 18%
Central
1 · 9%
Left Half-Space
3 · 27%
Left Wing
3 · 27%
Vision AI 55% of his carries are central — he steps out through the middle to draw a presser before releasing.
09
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (0.50/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Where does he become vulnerable?
29 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
13
attacking third (cheap)
10
middle third
6
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 45% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.37 danger-index/90 · 0.302 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Ryan Sessegnon gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
20%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
18%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
14%
Third
Left Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ryan Sessegnon actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
07
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the right hs in the final third — 1 passes worth 0.31 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 29% of his 17 touches there are lost (5 times).
08
Crosses & Cutbacks
5 crosses (2.50/90, 3 completed) and 2 cutbacks (1.00/90, 0 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.
Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
29 defensive actions across the season (14.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 0% won
4
interceptions · 2.0/90
11
recoveries · 5.5/90
6
clearances · 3.0/90
0
blocks
20
avg action height
0
won high (att 3rd)
6
middle third
23
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 16 proactive ball-wins (8.0/90), tackle success 0%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Fulham's output per match with Ryan Sessegnon (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.80
0.33
+1.47
points /match
0.60
1.67
-1.07
goals for /match
1.20
0.67
+0.53
xG for /match
1.56
0.49
+1.06
12
His Share of the Team
Of everything Fulham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ryan Sessegnon specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
goals
17%
1 / 6
interceptions
7%
29 / 424
tackles
6%
49 / 764
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Stopper centre-back60%Ball-playing centre-back19%
Why Stopper centre-back 60%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 81 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 54 (weight 35%) + transition 37 (weight 10%) + retention 8 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central), through-balls, box threat, line-breaking
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
98
Through-balls ~proxy
89
Box threat
88
Line-breaking
86
Ball-winning
81
Dribbling
66
Crossing
63
Progression
62
Receiving zones
58
Creativity
55
Defensive aggression
54
Final-third threat
51
Carrying
42
Transition ~proxy
37
Press resistance ~proxy
32
Build-up
13
Passing directness
12
Retention
8
15
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Neco Williams Nottingham Forest · 183 cm / 72 kg
93%
Driven by: build-up (15%), retention (13%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Williams more via creativity, final-third threat.
Héctor Fort Real Sociedad · La Liga · 185 cm / 78 kg
Driven by: build-up (15%), box threat (13%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Sarr more via creativity, carrying.
Amir Murillo Marseille · Ligue 1 25/26 · 184 cm / 75 kg
88%
Driven by: build-up (15%), retention (12%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Sessegnon more via ball-winning; Murillo more via crossing.
Nicolás Capaldo Hamburg · Bundesliga · 177 cm / 73 kg
87%
Driven by: build-up (21%), retention (14%), ball-winning (14%). Different mechanism — Sessegnon more via line-breaking, progression; Capaldo more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Adrià Pedrosa Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 172 cm / 69 kg
86%
Driven by: build-up (17%), retention (12%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Sessegnon more via ball-winning, transition; Pedrosa more via creativity, crossing.
16
Summary
Ryan Sessegnon is a stopper centre-back: 79% pass completion, 20 line-breaking passes and 5.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 5 matches (180 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.