Thin sample this season. Federico Chiesa has played 1 match (6 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Not enough matches loaded yet to establish a repeatable signature for him.
Not a pattern: receive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); turn / beat man — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Liverpool's output per match with Federico Chiesa (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
0.00
1.57
-1.57
xG for /match
1.09
0.14
+0.95
goals against /match
3.00
0.71
+2.29
points /match
0.00
2.14
-2.14
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Liverpool produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Federico Chiesa specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
shots
3%
17 / 621
expected goals (xG)
3%
1.5 / 60.5
tackles
2%
8 / 518
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Advanced playmaker (8)28%Half-space creator25%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 28%: a weighted blend of box threat 78 (weight 15%) + creativity 32 (weight 35%) + progression 24 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 17 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
box threat, passing directness
Average
ball-winning, territory (wide vs central), transition, receiving zones, defensive aggression
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
78
Passing directness
76
Ball-winning
56
Territory (wide vs central)
51
Transition ~proxy
45
Receiving zones
43
Defensive aggression
41
Creativity
32
Carrying
31
Progression
24
Build-up
17
Final-third threat
17
Crossing
13
Through-balls ~proxy
10
Press resistance ~proxy
10
Retention
7
Line-breaking
5
Dribbling
3
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 175 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Kevin Schade Brentford · 183 cm / 74 kg
85%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), retention (12%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via receiving zones, carrying; Schade more via defensive aggression.
Iñaki Williams Athletic Club · La Liga · 186 cm / 81 kg
84%
Driven by: build-up (14%), press resistance (14%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via ball-winning, passing directness; Williams more via line-breaking.
Vítinha Genoa · Serie A · 178 cm / 74 kg
83%
Driven by: crossing (14%), retention (13%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via receiving zones; Vítinha more via dribbling, defensive aggression.
Ismaïla Sarr Crystal Palace · 185 cm / 76 kg
83%
Driven by: press resistance (17%), dribbling (13%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning; Sarr more via build-up, crossing.
Dango Ouattara Brentford · 177 cm / 71 kg
82%
Driven by: retention (18%), press resistance (15%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via receiving zones; Ouattara more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Takuma Asano Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 173 cm / 71 kg
80%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), dribbling (12%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Chiesa more via passing directness, receiving zones; Asano more via defensive aggression.
06
Summary
Federico Chiesa is an advanced playmaker (8): 0.00 key passes /90, 0.0 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (6 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
