His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (54% of his 123 passes)
Signature: Receive → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 5× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
14
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
6
passes / match
1.2
dribbles / match
1–29
pass range (matches)
1–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (1 at the low end, 29 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
18 tracked carries (2.5/90, 7 progressive, 229m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 18 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 49m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (18)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Davide Frattesi's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.38 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 60%
OUTSIDE 40%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 4 outside
Right Wing
3 · 30%
Right Half-Space
2 · 20%
Central
3 · 30%
Left Half-Space
1 · 10%
Left Wing
1 · 10%
Vision AI 40% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
03
How does he create chances?
4 key passes (0.55/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09
Can he finish?
16 shots · 1.86 xG · 0 goals (-1.86 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.
shots 16 on target 7 goals 0 xG 1.86 xG on target 0.57 xG / shot 0.116
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
04
Where does he become vulnerable?
34 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
18
attacking third (cheap)
14
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 53% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.04 danger-index/90 · 0.222 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Davide Frattesi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Right Wing, Middle third
14%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Davide Frattesi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
08
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 50% of his 16 touches there are lost (8 times).
61 defensive actions across the season (8.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
15
tackles · 47% won
3
interceptions · 0.4/90
16
recoveries · 2.2/90
6
clearances · 0.8/90
5
blocks
44
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
20
middle third
27
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 34 proactive ball-wins (4.7/90), tackle success 47%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
10
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Davide Frattesi keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~7-8 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 6.9, 7m)
0.30
1.3
0.99
100%
Mid press (PPDA 9.8, 7m)
0.14
0.6
0.00
25%
Low press (PPDA 13.0, 8m)
0.25
0.0
0.38
33%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Lazio's output per match with Davide Frattesi (22 matches) versus without him (16 matches). A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (22)
WITHOUT (16)
Δ
goals for /match
1.95
2.88
-0.92
xG for /match
1.71
1.69
+0.02
goals against /match
0.50
1.50
-1.00
points /match
2.45
2.06
+0.39
13
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lazio produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Davide Frattesi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
5%
4.4 / 93.4
tackles
4%
31 / 772
shots
3%
30 / 873
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Transition runner 44%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 69 (weight 30%) + box threat 82 (weight 25%) + transition 15 (weight 45%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
82
Defensive aggression
69
Crossing
46
Ball-winning
43
Receiving zones
37
Retention
37
Press resistance ~proxy
35
Dribbling
35
Passing directness
35
Creativity
30
Build-up
16
Transition ~proxy
15
Carrying
14
Final-third threat
11
Territory (wide vs central)
10
Through-balls ~proxy
7
Progression
5
Line-breaking
5
16
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
El Bilal Touré Parma Calcio 1913 · 185 cm / 77 kg
88%
Driven by: build-up (13%), progression (11%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Frattesi more via retention, ball-winning; Touré more via territory (wide vs central).
Junior Dina Ebimbe Schalke · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 80 kg
85%
Driven by: progression (14%), final-third threat (13%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Ebimbe more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Mario Martín Getafe · La Liga · 178 cm / 74 kg
83%
Driven by: progression (13%), final-third threat (11%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Frattesi more via box threat, retention; Martín more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Pedro Díaz Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 180 cm / 75 kg
82%
Driven by: progression (15%), build-up (13%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Frattesi more via passing directness; Díaz more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
Marshall Munetsi Wolves · Ligue 1 25/26 · 188 cm / 83 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (13%), final-third threat (10%), build-up (10%). Different mechanism — Frattesi more via crossing, ball-winning; Munetsi more via passing directness.
Giovanni Fabbian Parma Calcio 1913 · 186 cm / 75 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (14%), final-third threat (11%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Frattesi more via crossing, ball-winning; Fabbian more via passing directness, build-up.
17
Summary
Davide Frattesi is a transition runner: 0.7 progressive passes, 0.55 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 1.86 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 22 matches (653 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
