Thin sample this season. Aaron Wan-Bissaka has played 6 matches (299 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 145 passes)
83% completion · 145× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
3.9 prog/90 · 13× in 4/6 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
40% won · 5× in 3/6 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
46 def actions · lost 25% deep · 46× in 6/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
14
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
24
passes / match
13.8
def actions / 90
8–56
pass range (matches)
9
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (8 at the low end, 56 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
29 tracked carries (8.7/90, 9 progressive, 297m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 29 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (20)Second (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
12
tackle duels
5
won
7
beaten · 58%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 42%
OUTSIDE 58%
Tackle-duel location — 5 inside · 7 outside
Right Wing
5 · 42%
Right Half-Space
1 · 8%
Central
3 · 25%
Left Half-Space
1 · 8%
Left Wing
2 · 17%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 12 tackle duels (58% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
He attempted only 5 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
04
How does he create chances?
2 key passes (0.60/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
08
Where does he become vulnerable?
27 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
9
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
7
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 33% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.74 danger-index/90 · 0.337 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Aaron Wan-Bissaka gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
35%
Primary
Right Wing, Middle third
12%
Secondary
Left Wing, Attacking third
11%
Third
Right Wing, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Aaron Wan-Bissaka actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
09
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.56 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 30% of his 10 touches there are lost (3 times).
03
Crosses & Cutbacks
4 crosses (1.20/90, 1 completed) and 2 cutbacks (0.60/90, 0 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.
Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
46 defensive actions across the season (13.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
12
tackles · 42% won
9
interceptions · 2.7/90
3
recoveries · 0.9/90
9
clearances · 2.7/90
3
blocks
30
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
11
middle third
32
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 24 proactive ball-wins (7.2/90), tackle success 42%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
10
Can he play under pressure?
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Aaron Wan-Bissaka still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.1, 2m)
76%
2.1
4.3
0.66
Mid press (PPDA 3.7, 2m)
90%
1.3
1.3
0.91
Low press (PPDA 6.5, 2m)
86%
7.7
3.4
2.00
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Aston Villa's output per match with Aaron Wan-Bissaka (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals against /match
1.17
2.50
-1.33
points /match
1.33
1.50
-0.17
goals for /match
1.17
1.00
+0.17
xG for /match
1.23
0.00
+1.23
13
His Share of the Team
Of everything Aston Villa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Aaron Wan-Bissaka specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
14%
49 / 348
clearances
12%
126 / 1034
progressive passes
9%
158 / 1858
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Overlapping full-back55%Inverted full-back26%
Why Overlapping full-back 55%: a weighted blend of crossing 68 (weight 30%) + final-third threat 47 (weight 25%) + dribbling 57 (weight 20%) + transition 44 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
92
Territory (wide vs central)
81
Crossing
68
Dribbling
57
Through-balls ~proxy
56
Ball-winning
53
Creativity
52
Progression
50
Final-third threat
47
Transition ~proxy
44
Line-breaking
43
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Carrying
38
Retention
33
Defensive aggression
30
Receiving zones
28
Build-up
22
Box threat
9
16
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Antonino Gallo Lecce · Serie A · 183 cm / 69 kg
85%
Driven by: box threat (20%), passing directness (18%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Wan-Bissaka more via through-balls; Gallo more via final-third threat.
Danilo Veiga Lecce · Serie A · 183 cm / 78 kg
83%
Driven by: box threat (23%), build-up (22%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Wan-Bissaka more via retention; Veiga more via defensive aggression, through-balls.
El Hadji Malick Diouf Brentford · 183 cm / 69 kg
77%
Driven by: passing directness (19%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), defensive aggression (15%). Different mechanism — Diouf more via box threat.
Vitalii Mykolenko Everton · 180 cm / 71 kg
71%
Driven by: passing directness (20%), box threat (15%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Wan-Bissaka more via dribbling; Mykolenko more via through-balls, final-third threat.
Ryan Giles Hull City · 179 cm / 72 kg
67%
Driven by: build-up (28%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), box threat (14%). Different mechanism — Wan-Bissaka more via ball-winning, dribbling; Giles more via carrying, territory (wide vs central).
Anis Ouzenadji Troyes · Ligue 1 · 177 cm
66%
Driven by: box threat (27%), passing directness (22%), build-up (21%). Different mechanism — Wan-Bissaka more via territory (wide vs central), progression; Ouzenadji more via transition, ball-winning.
17
Summary
Aaron Wan-Bissaka is an overlapping full-back: 3.9 progressive passes and 2 box entries, delivering 2 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 6 matches (299 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.