Thin sample this season. Lloyd Kelly has played 4 matches (173 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 112 passes)
86% completion · 112× in 4/4 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
8.3 prog/90 · 14× in 3/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.6/90 · 7× in 2/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); switch play — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
14
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
28
passes / match
10.4
def actions / 90
2–66
pass range (matches)
3
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 66 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
34 tracked carries (17.7/90, 8 progressive, 335m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 34 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (27)Second (7)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI too few tackle duels this season to read a pattern.
He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
03
How does he progress play?
How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.
16
progressive · 8.3/90
7
final-third entries · 3.6/90
1
box entries · 0.52/90
23
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
10
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07
Where does he become vulnerable?
16 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
2
attacking third (cheap)
7
middle third
7
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 12% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.41 danger-index/90 · 0.529 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08
Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted
His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.24
Left Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.22
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.21
Left Wing Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.19
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
0.19
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Lloyd Kelly gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
26%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
21%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
13%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Lloyd Kelly actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
09
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs in the final third — 1 passes worth 0.24 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 31% of his 13 touches there are lost (4 times).
20 defensive actions across the season (10.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
11
recoveries · 5.7/90
3
clearances · 1.6/90
0
blocks
25
avg action height
0
won high (att 3rd)
8
middle third
12
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 11 proactive ball-wins (5.7/90), tackle success 0%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Juventus's output per match with Lloyd Kelly (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
0.75
1.25
-0.50
points /match
2.25
1.25
+1.00
goals for /match
1.75
1.00
+0.75
xG for /match
1.41
1.20
+0.21
13
His Share of the Team
Of everything Juventus produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lloyd Kelly specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
clearances
10%
121 / 1170
ball recoveries
7%
179 / 2624
threat added by passing (xT)
5%
39.6 / 731.2
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Ball-playing centre-back68%Stopper centre-back63%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 68%: a weighted blend of retention 64 (weight 30%) + build-up 54 (weight 30%) + progression 63 (weight 25%) + press resistance 79 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
97
Dribbling
92
Transition ~proxy
80
Press resistance ~proxy
79
Defensive aggression
66
Final-third threat
64
Retention
64
Progression
63
Receiving zones
58
Build-up
54
Creativity
51
Box threat
49
Territory (wide vs central)
48
Ball-winning
46
Line-breaking
44
Through-balls ~proxy
43
Passing directness
42
Crossing
34
16
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 189 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Pablo Ramón Racing Santander · La Liga · 184 cm / 80 kg
69%
Driven by: transition (24%), carrying (19%), dribbling (17%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via through-balls, line-breaking; Ramón more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Mohammed Salisu Monaco · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
67%
Driven by: transition (27%), carrying (24%), dribbling (16%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central); Salisu more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Jacobo Ramón Como · 195 cm / 80 kg
65%
Driven by: carrying (23%), transition (20%), press resistance (12%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via dribbling; Ramón more via passing directness, box threat.
Castello Lukeba RBL · Bundesliga · 184 cm / 73 kg
65%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), press resistance (20%), carrying (19%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central); Lukeba more via line-breaking, passing directness.
John Stones Inter · 188 cm / 80 kg
64%
Driven by: carrying (26%), press resistance (24%), dribbling (19%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Stones more via receiving zones, retention.
Marin Pongracic Fiorentina · 193 cm / 95 kg
63%
Driven by: carrying (27%), transition (21%), press resistance (20%). Different mechanism — Kelly more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central); Pongracic more via passing directness, build-up.
17
Summary
Lloyd Kelly is a ball-playing centre-back / stopper centre-back: 86% pass completion, 14 line-breaking passes and 8.3 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 4 matches (173 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back / stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is build-up — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.