العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2025/26

Gabriel Magalhães

Arsenal
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.6 progressive passes/90 · 0.6 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending32%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.5864%
Ball-Winning34%vs 50 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.7726%
Ball recoveries /902.126%
Tackles /901.1642%
Duels won /902.864%
Breaking Pressure
only 86 pressured-passing actions across 2 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression44%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.6834%
Line-breaking passes /900.5830%
Threat added by passing /900.96xT48%
Pass accuracy88.22%66%
Ball-Carrying45%vs 50 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /905.5552%
Carry distance /90111.62m38%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
3728
minutes
40 apps
2198
passes
88% completed
88%
pass completion
2198 passes
231
progressive passes
5.6/90
215
line-breaking passes
5.2/90
636
defensive actions
15.4/90
80
tackles + interceptions
46% tackle win
231
clearances
5.6/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (54% of his 2198 passes)
88% completion · 2198× in 40/40 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.6 prog/90 · 215× in 40/40 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 53× in 25/40 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.7/90 · 154× in 35/40 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 6× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
18

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
55
passes / match
15.4
def actions / 90
9–103
pass range (matches)
231
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (9 at the low end, 103 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

523 tracked carries (12.6/90, 122 progressive, 4292m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

0%0%2%11%15%9%2%8%19%21%11%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 523 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
31Outside → Inside
407Inside → Inside
51Outside → Outside
34Inside → Outside
First (164)Second (163)Third (99)Fourth (97)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

48
tackle duels
22
won
26
beaten · 54%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 71%
OUTSIDE 29%
Tackle-duel location — 34 inside · 14 outside
Right Wing
2 · 4%
Right Half-Space
3 · 6%
Central
14 · 29%
Left Half-Space
17 · 35%
Left Wing
12 · 25%
Vision AI beaten in 26 of 48 tackle duels (54% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

14%
vertical passes
181×
3%
switches
45×
30%
carries
398×
53%
short circulation
713×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW956%522%222%2RHS5342%2225%1328%156%3C5514%2025%13940%22020%10911%63LHS10011%159%9445%44717%16928%276LW3251%425%8038%12336%118FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 10 progressive passes (9% of his progression) at 0.006 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 42% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 17% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 24 line-breaking passes and 154 final-third entries, 26.7 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%1%1%1%0%0%4%9%14%7%2%0%6%17%17%14%5%0%
completedincomplete2198 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
2198
passes
88%
completed
259
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 88% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

231
progressive · 5.6/90
154
final-third entries · 3.7/90
7
box entries · 0.17/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
13

How does he create chances?

6 key passes (0.14/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%50%17%
chance creation (6)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

260 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

31
attacking third (cheap)
110
middle third
119
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 12% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.21 danger-index/90 · 0.511 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

2198
passes attempted
46%
mostly forward
51%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
1004 · 46%
Sideways
811 · 37%
Backward
383 · 17%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
843 · 43%
Medium
986 · 51%
Long (>30m)
110 · 6%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

2.571.831.241.191.030.92
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
2.57
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
36 passes · 1 to a shot
1.83
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
35 passes
1.24
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
4 passes
1.19
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
5 passes · 2 to a shot
1.03
Left Wing Def third → Left Wing Mid third
14 passes
0.92
Left Wing Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
10 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Gabriel Magalhães gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
28%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
18%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
16%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Gabriel Magalhães actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1373703683171172952043131614937611211379
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%1%1%1%0%0%4%9%14%7%2%0%6%17%17%14%5%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

6Key pass
9Cross
5Cutback
231Progressive
215Long ball
53Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
211Outside → Inside
1209Inside → Inside
123Outside → Outside
396Inside → Outside
By direction
1004Forward
383Backward
811Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 36 passes worth 2.57 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 6 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 46% of his 13 touches there are lost (6 times).
—6 touches · too few6%1/17 lost10%22/230 lost13%51/401 lost26%43/165 lost—2 touches · too few36%17/47 lost9%32/341 lost6%35/613 lost14%26/190 lost—5 touches · too few46%6/13 lost23%10/44 lost8%6/79 lost13%6/45 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
12

Crosses & Cutbacks

9 crosses (0.22/90, 0 completed) and 5 cutbacks (0.12/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

636 defensive actions across the season (15.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
48
tackles · 46% won
32
interceptions · 0.8/90
88
recoveries · 2.1/90
231
clearances · 5.6/90
18
blocks
30
avg action height
57
won high (att 3rd)
172
middle third
407
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 168 proactive ball-wins (4.1/90), tackle success 46%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
15

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Gabriel Magalhães still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~13-14 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.7, 13m)
82%
4.2
5.9
0.76
Mid press (PPDA 6.6, 13m)
90%
5.2
4.9
0.95
Low press (PPDA 9.9, 14m)
91%
7.3
4.8
1.18
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

16

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Gabriel Magalhães played nearly every Arsenal match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

17

His Share of the Team

Of everything Arsenal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Gabriel Magalhães specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
18%
231 / 1258
interceptions
9%
32 / 374
final-third entries
7%
181 / 2583
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

19

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back61%Stopper centre-back37%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 61%: a weighted blend of retention 72 (weight 30%) + build-up 57 (weight 30%) + progression 41 (weight 25%) + press resistance 61 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
box threat, retention
Average
receiving zones, press resistance, build-up, final-third threat, defensive aggression, creativity, through-balls, carrying, progression
Weak
dribbling, transition, line-breaking, passing directness, crossing, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
81
Retention
72
Receiving zones
64
Press resistance ~proxy
61
Build-up
57
Final-third threat
53
Defensive aggression
52
Creativity
51
Through-balls ~proxy
50
Carrying
45
Progression
41
Dribbling
39
Transition ~proxy
35
Line-breaking
33
Passing directness
33
Crossing
31
Territory (wide vs central)
31
Ball-winning
25
20

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 92 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Francisco Sierralta Auxerre · Ligue 1 25/26 · 190 cm / 83 kg
67%
Driven by: transition (16%), box threat (13%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Magalhães more via through-balls, final-third threat; Sierralta more via dribbling, defensive aggression.
Tanguy Nianzou Lille · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 83 kg
64%
Driven by: ball-winning (23%), box threat (22%), transition (16%). Different mechanism — Magalhães more via receiving zones, final-third threat; Nianzou more via line-breaking.
Sepp van den Berg Brentford · 189 cm / 74 kg
56%
Driven by: box threat (20%), ball-winning (16%), retention (16%). Different mechanism — Magalhães more via receiving zones, final-third threat.
Pascal Struijk Brighton · 190 cm / 79 kg
56%
Driven by: box threat (28%), retention (19%), ball-winning (14%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness.
Patrick Mainka Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 194 cm / 86 kg
56%
Driven by: box threat (17%), crossing (16%), ball-winning (14%). Different mechanism — Magalhães more via through-balls, final-third threat; Mainka more via passing directness.
Marc Oliver Kempf Como · Serie A · 186 cm / 87 kg
53%
Driven by: ball-winning (29%), box threat (22%), territory (wide vs central) (9%). Different mechanism — Magalhães more via press resistance, receiving zones; Kempf more via carrying, transition.
21

Summary

Gabriel Magalhães is a ball-playing centre-back: 88% pass completion, 215 line-breaking passes and 5.6 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 40 matches (3728 minutes) this season — a reliable read. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report