Thin sample this season. Eddie Nketiah has played 7 matches (262 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE / MOVE
occupy the box, drop or run channel — mostly in the attacking third (47% of his 51 passes)
Signature: Receive / Move → Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
17 tracked carries (5.8/90, 4 progressive, 149m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 17 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (17)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 3.09 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 44%
OUTSIDE 56%
Dribble location — 4 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 11%
Central
1 · 11%
Left Half-Space
2 · 22%
Left Wing
5 · 56%
Vision AI His touches are spread wide — a roaming forward.
02
How does he create chances?
4 key passes (1.37/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (1)of 4 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
04
Where does he become vulnerable?
18 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
9
attacking third (cheap)
7
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 50% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.65 danger-index/90 · 0.267 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 25% of his 8 touches there are lost (2 times).
45 defensive actions across the season (15.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 100% won
1
interceptions · 0.3/90
8
recoveries · 2.7/90
2
clearances · 0.7/90
1
blocks
55
avg action height
16
won high (att 3rd)
22
middle third
7
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 13 proactive ball-wins (4.5/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
29
attacking-half actions · 9.96/90
06
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Eddie Nketiah keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.4, 2m)
0.28
3.7
0.00
100%
Mid press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.34
2.3
1.14
33%
Low press (PPDA 5.1, 3m)
0.59
0.7
2.01
20%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Crystal Palace's output per match with Eddie Nketiah (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
2.00
-1.00
xG for /match
1.18
0.00
+1.18
goals against /match
2.29
3.00
-0.71
points /match
1.00
0.00
+1.00
09
His Share of the Team
Of everything Crystal Palace produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Eddie Nketiah specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
4%
2.4 / 65.0
shots
4%
20 / 558
successful take-ons
3%
8 / 240
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Pressing forward 77%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 92 (weight 30%) + defensive aggression 54 (weight 45%) + transition 80 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Crossing
96
Ball-winning
92
Carrying
91
Through-balls ~proxy
90
Progression
87
Line-breaking
82
Transition ~proxy
80
Territory (wide vs central)
80
Build-up
80
Final-third threat
76
Retention
68
Dribbling
57
Defensive aggression
54
Press resistance ~proxy
52
Passing directness
51
Creativity
45
Box threat
44
Receiving zones
16
11
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 175 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Jhon Arias Wolves 25/26 · 168 cm / 82 kg
88%
Driven by: ball-winning (15%), crossing (14%), build-up (11%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via passing directness, box threat; Arias more via receiving zones, final-third threat.
Abdallah Sima Lens · Ligue 1 · 188 cm / 79 kg
80%
Driven by: build-up (15%), ball-winning (12%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via passing directness, crossing; Sima more via receiving zones, box threat.
Pavel Sulc Lyon · Ligue 1 · 177 cm / 75 kg
79%
Driven by: ball-winning (18%), build-up (14%), crossing (10%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via crossing, carrying; Sulc more via receiving zones.
Hwang Hee-Chan Schalke · Bundesliga · 177 cm / 77 kg
79%
Driven by: build-up (12%), transition (12%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via defensive aggression, box threat; Hee-Chan more via receiving zones, passing directness.
Jack Harrison Leeds · Serie A 25/26 · 175 cm / 70 kg
79%
Driven by: ball-winning (12%), build-up (11%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via defensive aggression, crossing; Harrison more via receiving zones, creativity.
Iván Romero Levante · La Liga · 172 cm / 72 kg
77%
Driven by: ball-winning (19%), through-balls (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Nketiah more via crossing, build-up; Romero more via receiving zones, creativity.
12
Summary
Eddie Nketiah is a pressing forward / transition runner: 0 goals from 0.64 xG (-0.64 vs expected), 5 shots, 3 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 7 matches (262 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is defensive aggression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.