العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2025/26

Adrián Bernabé

Parma Calcio 1913
Advanced playmaker CM
2.03 key passes/90 · 0.57 xT/90
central midadvanced playmaker (8)progressionbox-to-box
2841
minutes
38 apps
150
progressive passes
4.8/90
82%
pass completion
1584 passes
64
key passes
2.03/90
42
box entries
1.33/90
167
final-3rd entries
5.3/90
59
dribbles
31% won
334
possessions lost
2.98 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (63% of his 1584 passes)
82% completion · 1584× in 38/38 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
4.8 prog/90 · 150× in 36/38 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
64 key passes · 42× in 25/38 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
2.03 key passes /90 · 3 goals · 116× in 30/38 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
42
passes / match
2.2
dribbles / match
3–89
pass range (matches)
1–6
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 89 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

12

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

396 tracked carries (12.5/90, 86 progressive, 3542m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

1%4%16%23%12%1%0%5%13%10%5%1%4%2%2%0%
progressivelateral/short% of his 396 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 44m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
36Outside → Inside
248Inside → Inside
86Outside → Outside
26Inside → Outside
First (151)Second (124)Third (62)Fourth (59)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Adrián Bernabé's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.87 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 54%
OUTSIDE 46%
Dribble location — 32 inside · 27 outside
Right Wing
26 · 44%
Right Half-Space
15 · 25%
Central
12 · 20%
Left Half-Space
5 · 8%
Left Wing
1 · 2%
Vision AI 46% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
07

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW36346%16737%13415%531%51%4RHS41832%13324%10231%1308%345%19C33812%4219%6434%11622%7612%40LHS1302%25%725%3232%4137%48LW422%129%1233%1436%15FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → central areas in the final third — 16 progressive passes (11% of his progression) at 0.186 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 56% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 4% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

11% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 53 line-breaking passes and 167 final-third entries, 17.9 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%5%14%20%14%4%0%3%11%12%6%0%0%1%2%4%3%1%
completedincomplete1584 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
1584
passes
82%
completed
293
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 82% season completion rate.
02

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

150
progressive · 4.8/90
167
final-third entries · 5.3/90
42
box entries · 1.33/90
21
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
05

How does he create chances?

64 key passes (2.03/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
5%5%33%4%5%9%25%2%7%4%
chance creation (55)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
15

Can he finish?

52 shots · 2.37 xG · 3 goals (+0.63 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  52
on target  34
goals  3
xG  2.37
xG on target  3.28
xG / shot  0.045
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

334 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

135
attacking third (cheap)
158
middle third
41
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 40% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.98 danger-index/90 · 0.281 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

1584
passes attempted
42%
mostly forward
46%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
670 · 42%
Sideways
480 · 30%
Backward
434 · 27%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
588 · 46%
Medium
570 · 44%
Long (>30m)
133 · 10%
04

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

1.741.471.281.071.010.88
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
1.74
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
12 passes
1.47
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
6 passes
1.28
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
4 passes · 2 to a shot
1.07
Right Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
4 passes · 3 to a shot
1.01
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
4 passes · 1 to a shot
0.88
Right Wing Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
3 passes
10

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Adrián Bernabé gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
21%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
17%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
17%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
11

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Adrián Bernabé actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
3184262401465718519111811127822632223872
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%5%14%20%14%4%0%3%11%12%6%0%0%1%2%4%3%1%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

64Key pass
34Cross
3Cutback
150Progressive
182Long ball
98Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
219Outside → Inside
602Inside → Inside
186Outside → Outside
284Inside → Outside
By direction
670Forward
434Backward
480Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 12 passes worth 1.74 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 64 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 13 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 34% of his 29 touches there are lost (10 times).
32%14/44 lost14%7/49 lost17%8/47 lost11%2/19 lost—4 touches · too few16%42/261 lost15%50/332 lost10%27/275 lost11%11/98 lost34%10/29 lost33%56/170 lost28%36/130 lost22%14/65 lost19%6/32 lost31%9/29 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
06

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 396 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (63%). He carries from outside into the middle 36 times and out toward the touchline 26 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
17 · 4%
Progressive / key pass
35 · 9%
Simple pass
262 · 66%
No clean link
82 · 21%
Of 396 carries, 4% flow straight into a shot of his own, 9% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 21% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
16

Crosses & Cutbacks

34 crosses (1.08/90, 9 completed) and 3 cutbacks (0.10/90, 2 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

17

How & where does he defend?

303 defensive actions across the season (9.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
45
tackles · 64% won
19
interceptions · 0.6/90
122
recoveries · 3.9/90
32
clearances · 1.0/90
18
blocks
39
avg action height
32
won high (att 3rd)
129
middle third
142
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 186 proactive ball-wins (5.9/90), tackle success 64%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
18

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Adrián Bernabé keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~12-14 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.8, 12m)
0.99
3.7
1.06
27%
Mid press (PPDA 5.1, 12m)
1.36
5.3
2.59
22%
Low press (PPDA 8.4, 14m)
1.43
5.1
2.33
43%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

19

Impact on the Team

Parma Calcio 1913's output per match with Adrián Bernabé (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
0.33
1.50
-1.17
xG for /match
0.89
0.63
+0.26
goals against /match
2.17
1.00
+1.17
points /match
0.00
2.00
-2.00
20

His Share of the Team

Of everything Parma Calcio 1913 produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Adrián Bernabé specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
14%
31 / 225
final-third entries
13%
209 / 1662
box entries
12%
58 / 487
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Advanced playmaker (8)79%Transition runner60%Box-to-box runner59%Deep-lying playmaker51%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 79%: a weighted blend of creativity 79 (weight 35%) + final-third threat 79 (weight 25%) + progression 67 (weight 25%) + box threat 68 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
creativity, final-third threat, through-balls, receiving zones
Average
box threat, carrying, progression, line-breaking, passing directness, transition, crossing, build-up, retention, defensive aggression, ball-winning, press resistance
Weak
territory (wide vs central), dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Creativity
79
Final-third threat
79
Through-balls ~proxy
75
Receiving zones
72
Box threat
68
Carrying
68
Progression
67
Line-breaking
64
Passing directness
62
Transition ~proxy
62
Crossing
50
Build-up
49
Retention
46
Defensive aggression
43
Ball-winning
42
Press resistance ~proxy
40
Territory (wide vs central)
39
Dribbling
37
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 170 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Enzo Fernández Man City · Premier League · 178 cm / 73 kg
85%
Driven by: creativity (21%), final-third threat (13%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Fernández more via box threat, receiving zones.
Maxime Lopez Paris FC · Ligue 1 · 167 cm / 58 kg
77%
Driven by: creativity (17%), final-third threat (13%), height (9%). Different mechanism — Bernabé more via box threat, dribbling; Lopez more via build-up, line-breaking.
Christian Eriksen Wolfsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 182 cm / 76 kg
74%
Driven by: creativity (27%), final-third threat (19%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Bernabé more via carrying.
Pablo Torre Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 173 cm / 65 kg
73%
Driven by: creativity (24%), final-third threat (15%), box threat (9%). Different mechanism — Bernabé more via passing directness, through-balls.
Rémy Cabella Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 171 cm / 68 kg
73%
Driven by: creativity (21%), final-third threat (14%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Bernabé more via passing directness; Cabella more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Jari Vandeputte Cremonese 25/26 · 177 cm / 69 kg
72%
Driven by: creativity (19%), final-third threat (14%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Bernabé more via retention, press resistance; Vandeputte more via ball-winning.
24

Summary

Adrián Bernabé is an advanced playmaker (8) / transition runner: 4.8 progressive passes, 2.03 key passes /90, 42 box entries, 3 goals from 2.37 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 38 matches (2841 minutes) this season — a reliable read. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report